Sentences with phrase «think less debt»

Not exact matches

But he acknowledged that student debt was a «huge issue», telling the Bright Blue liberal conservative think tank's conference: «If you wanted to say you want to reduce that (fees) then either fewer people go to university or the experience would be less.

If you have a slow month, you'll know you'll have less to spend and can start thinking of ways to tighten up your budget and avoid getting into debt.

When I think about investing vs debt, I tend to think about the Roth a bit differently than other platforms only because elapsed time is not something you can make up (both in the sense that you can not make up for lost investment time AND the fact that $ 5,500 today is worth less than that $ 5,500 was worth one year ago).

You'd think that corporate debt would grow in proportion to total sales, as this additional debt is used to fund investments in productive activities that create more sales and contribute to the economy, and that higher sales, and presumably higher earnings would create a proportionate increase in the value of the company, and thus in its stock price, and that they all go up together, not in lockstep but over time more or less at the same rate.

Think of it as a credit card but with higher limits, generally lower rates and less time to pay off your debts.

Thought he said we are moving to the emirates to compete with the best and not move to the emirates to pay the debt and settle for less!!

And i think he will go for less than that as the club is in massive debt, Portuguese clubs always put a huge buy out in before selling for less.

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

I think the main task for labour is to convince people of the economic case for their plans to increase spending and why austerity measures need to be less and how this relates to the national debt.

Whenever you doubt that think of my list above or this simple fact: NYC has stayed in the black for twelve years (even though the mayor claimed otherwise more than once just to keep us fiscally conservative) and unlike many cities with far less social programs, NYC never had to entertain bankruptcy (e.g., Detroit goes under with $ 18 billion debt but NYC thrives with a $ 24 billion budget for DOE alone).

You may think you're effectively chipping away at sleep debt with those little bits and pieces of «sleep,» but you're really just fragmenting your sleep (PDF), which leads to «sleepiness - related daytime impairment,» compulsory afternoon caffeine infusions, and less productivity.

Creditors who think you might choose bankruptcy are more likely to settle your debt for less if they think they'll recoup some money instead of losing it all.

For example, you would think that owing a lot of money to a lender would make students want to spend less, minimizing their debt and keeping things in check as much as possible.

The rest are less optimistic: 28.3 % think they can eliminate debt within 10 years, and 11 % see themselves taking up to 20 years to reach that goal.

That means your debt balloons quickly, and you can burn through your home's value in less time than you think.

The older the debt is, the less you should settle it for, especially if you think a junk debt buyer has purchased the account.

Think of it as a credit card but with higher limits, generally lower rates and less time to pay off your debts.

Wealthier borrowers also rely less heavily on student debt to finance college, according to left - leaning think tank Demos.

So, what's your thought process then on advising someone who has debt now and — I mean let's assume they've got a mortgage but they've also got some other less good debt, credit cards, bank loans, whatever.

If you have debts and your creditors don't think that your outgoings are reasonable, they are less likely to agree to reduced payment offers.

Some think that the debt avalanche is a better way to go, because it looks at the math involved in paying of credit card debt (and other debt), and helps you pay less overall — and get out of debt faster.

okay here's my two cents worth folks im up for renewal and have just nagotiated a rate 5 yr variable1.75 persent or if i want a five yr fixed at 4.49 still quite a gap between fixed and variable here i believe i have a little lee way here apparently i was only interesed in variable and five yr fixed but i made it absulutly apparent to them that when lock in from a variable i get the whosale discounted rate at that time and written into the contract i kinda believe this the way the market is heading as we head out of ressesion and the bank of canada is going to make there move i believe coming up in june and just to make this firm i do not believe the boc will raise rates in fast mode far from it will be slow process i don't care what the ecconmists are thinking we have to remember manufactering sector is reallt taking a hit on the high dollar and don't forget our niegbours to the south how dependent our canada is with them i believe it will be a slow process a lot of people heve put themselves in a debt load over these enormously low interest rates but i may be wrong i think a variable is the way to go if you want to work on that princibal at least should i say the say the short to medium term and betting that the bond markets stay put for the short to medium term - i have given enough interest to the banks maybe i can pay a little less at least fot the short to mediun term here i have not completly decided yet put i think im going variable although i wish my mtge was up a year ago that would have been just great congradulations to all that did.

Tom (10:58) «Any debt that has a rate of return or a cost of it less than what you think you're going to earn long - term in your portfolio...»

i have been thinking of your picks and i have goal which is less than 2 years, will your pick will still be profitable considering the exit load which is there if there is redemption below 3 years as it is debt conservative fund (BL SL WEALTH 25)

When the economy is strong, consumers tend to spend freely, save less, and rack up credit card and other debt without a second thought.

I'm of the opinion that all debt is bad debt, although I do think that what you and others would call «good debt» is less bad than other kinds of debt.

You may think that because you're diligent about spending less than you earn and avoiding excessive debt, you could never go bankrupt.

«We need people to realize that if they are going to spend their RRSP refund, as almost everyone does, you're putting in less than you thought,» said Stevens, author of the Smart Debt Coach.

Could that artificial threshold be about profitability and your membership does not think it's profitable to help people with less debt?

The less time they're spending worrying about their student loan debt, the more time they have to think about their jobs.

I think P / S approach is less of an issue than you might think: Over time, my mental scale of P / S ratios has evolved to accommodate normal levels of cash / debt.

There's a cost to paying less than you owe — Before you jump at the chance to pay less than what you owe, think about what settling your debt will end up costing you.

We expect, given the finding that Retail taxes produce less of a drag on the economy than Income taxes that if a government decides it must raise new taxes (perish the thought), then it ought by the Precautionary Principle do so by reducing the Income Tax rate so low as possible and raising the Retail Tax rate to meet the needs of the state — for instance to pay off debt accumulated by fighting foreign wars.

It's getting out of there with less than a billion dollars in student loans, which I think is the latest approximation of debt per student.

Problems that seem almost insurmountable (crushing debt, houses worth less than the mortgage, differences in parenting styles) may turn out to be more manageable than you ever thought would be possible.

@Ryan Murphy and @Eric M., I've been thinking that if I can survive the renovations and get the properties rented (I'd like to hang onto the properties if I can, selling is less desirable back up option) then I would try to secure a HLOC to consolidate my debt, but I've been wondering about the debt to income being a problem.