Not exact matches
What we have are over 6,000 hand copies
of what we
think is an «original» Bible, yet
none of the 6,000 copies say the exact same
thing.
Yes — and I
think there is something in our human nature that is about survival that while a good and necessary
thing to have can when mixed with
none of us being perfect lead us to perceptions and magical
thinking which may or may not be in touch with reality.
None of those
things you said are founded on anything other than the fact that people have told you to
think so.
All
of you could be wrong and it would be a parable for a half a dozen useful
things none of you have even
thought of before.
Yeah, that sort
of makes the whole
thing supernatural, and yes that requires evangelicals to see the fruit
of the Spirit and the «mere Christianity» in believers in other denominations (and
none), but I'm just naive and stupid enough to
think God can do stuff like that.
Jeremy Myers, i
think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list
of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way,
none, i
think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these
things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really
think it is the slip ups that we are convicted
of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out
of marriage, lie, break every commandment
of God, i don't
think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot
of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one
of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word
of God, God hates sin,
Then we will never come away empty - handed from prayer, because even if we wind up with
none of the
things we
thought we needed, we will always wind up with God listening, attending and answering our prayers in ways we hadn't imagined.
Clearly,
none of us are perfect, but those positive characteristics that have resulted from esteeming godly
things in our lives can, to our shock and dismay, end up being despised by a person that we
thought might be the «right» person for us.
Conservative
thinking / actions have given us
NONE of those
things.
Had another
thought on this Go and sin no more in the first instance when the pharisees were condemning the woman Jesus says you without sin cast the first stone thats present tense when he said Go and sin no more that future tense he is letting us know that since we all are sinners deserving
of death he does not condemn us but came to save us and we see him do that for the woman caught in sin as we all are.Humanly speaking
none of us can walk without sinning it is impossible unless we submit ourselves to Christ and walk by faith by the holy spirit and we can do all
things through Christ that strengthens us.brentnz
A few mates and I have been
thinking around and trying a few
things on this one for the last 6 months or so (I did my leaving back in September, various reasons,
none of the ones on the rumour list).
None of my friends are to blame for where
things ended up, but I
think we all wonder if we were prepared for the difficulty
of serving in the church without losing soul health in the process.
I was
none of those
things, and by the perpetual frown on my face, you would have
thought I was one
of those unfortunate people who are
If you
think it's crap then fine by me.Some
of you are just rude yet you don't want people to act rudely to you.The funny
thing is every transfer they've put out including
none Arsenal one's are all happening with the exception
of the Neymar one.1 mistake out
of 100 is very impressive.Idon't care what you say and will continue reporting the truth
none the less.If you can't cope with it then stop speaking anyhow.
For donkeys years now we have done the approximately same
things: 1) We have a poor start 2) We pick up in September and we all
think we are going to have a good year 3) Once the weather gets cold we lose games against all sorts and drop like a stone 4) Towards the end
of March when the weather gets better we start winning again and we qualify for the Champions League (apart from last year) I have a feeling it will be broadly the same this year except Spuds and Liverpool are better for the last couple
of years that they used to be and
none of the big money three look vulnerable so we won't finish above them..
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition
of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release
of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state
of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid
of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would
think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy
of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid
of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid
of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction
of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return
of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort
of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative
of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition
of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle
of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any
of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind
of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack
of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result
of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest
of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands
of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when
none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club
of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid
of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field
of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version
of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history
of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet
of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival
of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone
of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players
of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that
of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part
of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great
things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet
of those who were well aware all along
of the potential pitfalls
of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
That's not to say that after facing us they will take a liking to one
of our players and
think on it in summer like with Henry Bronkhorst etc but this
thing they do before games is a ploy
none the less..
Once again
none of my top five available players were picked, and I
think it's starting to become a me
thing.
I understand that he's not irreplaceable and I
think all this contract talk is
none of his own doing, but he's the best
thing we've had in the backfield for a while now and I'd love to c him in red and black for a long time..
We would like to
think that we can guarantee that
things will stay the same forever, that just because we call someone «my husband» or «my wife» means we don't have to care - take the relationship, or that if we do X, Y and Z we can somehow divorce - proof or affair - proof a marriage, but we can't — not unless we can control a partner's actions and
none of us can do that.
We started
thinking about nifty gadgets — like
things that you wish you would have invented — but
none of them could be found in town.»
I Googled every variation
of knitted, rope, baby, bag, hanging, and more I could
think of, and while I discovered plenty
of fun
things,
none of them was a string baby bag.
«All the mailings, all the negative
things that went out, I
think that
none of that worked, because the community knew who I was,» Ms. Cancel said in an interview on Tuesday evening.
If you
think this blog has been involved in tat for tat, or any
of the other accusations that you've flung around, why didn't you post this rant on that post rather than this one, which signally does
none of those
things?
«But I
think where we disagree is that, I don't
think it's good enough to just talk about it, I want it in writing, I want it enforceable because I've seen first hand and experienced it first hand what happened in Destiny when they just said we're going to do all
of these
things and
none of those
things happened.»
The one
thing I would add is that there was no one I recall saying a word about Japan; we did not consider them a threat and
none of us has
thought of using the weapon on Japan as an immediate matter.
Of course that I do have and do like fine things in life, I love to live well and dine well, I like to travel and I like to do all sorts of stuff that does include Visa payments, but when I really think about things that keep me happy and fulfilled for a long time, none of them are materialistic and if I would have to I could totally live without the
Of course that I do have and do like fine
things in life, I love to live well and dine well, I like to travel and I like to do all sorts
of stuff that does include Visa payments, but when I really think about things that keep me happy and fulfilled for a long time, none of them are materialistic and if I would have to I could totally live without the
of stuff that does include Visa payments, but when I really
think about
things that keep me happy and fulfilled for a long time,
none of them are materialistic and if I would have to I could totally live without the
of them are materialistic and if I would have to I could totally live without them.
Master
of None Season 2 does a
thing I dislike in shows about aspiring show - business types, where the protagonist over the course
of the season seems to have achieved some fantastic career success (usually — and in this case — toplining a TV show) with it either falling out from underneath him in the season finale (
think Louis Season 3), or being artistically underwhelming (Extras Season 2).
The film is literally
none of those
things and I hope it doesn't fool you into
thinking otherwise.
That said, I don't
think the marketing failing to show this as something «new» was the problem: this film had no Thulsa Doom, Valeria, Subotai, Tower
of the Serpent, Moutnain
of Power, giant snakes, camel punching or whatnot, and
none of those
things in the trailer: it had characters, locations and ideas that were completely absent in the 1982 film (if horribly derivative
of past films).
When I
think about the type
of things that I might change in schools — and I know
none of it is easy — a lot
of it is about breaking down barriers.
Of course, most risk assessors are subconsciously aware of the importance of these things, but without an explicit requirement to think formally about them they receive piecemeal and variable recognition, and sometimes non
Of course, most risk assessors are subconsciously aware
of the importance of these things, but without an explicit requirement to think formally about them they receive piecemeal and variable recognition, and sometimes non
of the importance
of these things, but without an explicit requirement to think formally about them they receive piecemeal and variable recognition, and sometimes non
of these
things, but without an explicit requirement to
think formally about them they receive piecemeal and variable recognition, and sometimes
none.
We have come away from
none of our encounters with the 583 - horsepower Mercedes - Benz SLS AMG GT (which also rates a spot on this list)
thinking the one
thing this car could use is more power.
«We
think we've got a better idea, a truck that uses its unibody construction and Honda packaging magic to deliver more
of the
things that many
of today's truck customers want and need with
none of the
things they don't.»
And here's the
thing: while I
think none of us would have asked a man like O'Reilly for the sheer volume
of selfhood that musical artist and writer Amanda Palmer brought to her pivotal keynote address at the Muse this weekend in Boston, I can tell you that a lot
of TOC folks — even business - side operatives, not artists —
thought that in this man O'Reilly we were seeing what the critic James Wood (also in Boston) has reminded us Walter Benjamin quoted Nicolas Malebranch to call «the natural prayer
of the soul»: attentiveness.
You
think it will never happen to you, that it can not happen to you, that you are the only person in the world to whom
none of these
things will ever happen, and then, one by one, they all begin to happen to you, in the same way they happen to everyone else.
For my print published books, I've had degrees
of input from
none to not too much but by and large, I
think that's a good
thing.
When you
think about the process for taking out a typical loan,
none of those
things typically come to mind.
I did
none of these
things before
thinking about investing, and my finances crumbled because I didn't have a solid foundation!
So I
think the answer to all these questions is that the automated system does
none of these
things.
If
none of these
things help, you may want to
think about switching your dog's diet.
None of what I write below is meant to be definitive or «the right way to do
things», this is just me saying what works for me and how I do and
think about
things.
Most
of all Respawn were keen to stress that if a high player count is your
thing then Titanfall is most likely not for you: «
None of us are diluted enough to
think we're making a game that fits every gamer.
As with most Point - and - Click games, the actual puzzles can be hit and miss depending on whether you are
thinking about
things the right way — while sometimes you'll find yourself logically following the chain
of motions you need to follow in order to accomplish your goal, at other times you might have a different idea as to how you are supposed to progress, and find yourself baffled as to why
none of your ideas are working — or what you are supposed to do at all.
This is one
of those
things you just don't
think will ever happen: Tail Concerto, a mecha platformer on the original PlayStation with a cult following, is apparently getting a sequel (
of sorts) entitled Solarobo Sore Kara Coda E for the Nintendo DS (made by
none other than CyberConnect2, the developers behind the.
Player 2's E3 2017 Game
of The Show As we come to the end
of another E3 we
thought we would do the traditional «game
of the show
thing» but as it turns out,
none of us could agree on one title.
None the less, looks like a lot
of things have been changed in these games, don't you
think?
Not just the way it encapsulates so many good ideas but also the sense in which it is a «living»
thing,
none of these ideas are «finished», just staring points for even further
thought.
«The only logical
thing I can
think of,» he said, «is that I knew there were such
things as artists, and I knew there were
none where I lived.
And I'm pretty sure
none of these papers takes the view that preventing glaciation is the right
thing to do and
thinking otherwise is «callous».