If we had more of an opinion, the teachers might learn more of what
we think of certain things and could make their lessons more interesting so they could have more engaged learners.»
Not exact matches
Regardless
of what people
think of you at any particular moment, one
thing is
certain — you're never as good or bad as they say you are.
EASTWOOD: Well I
think yeah, sometimes you can have overly dramatic music and I started writing music basically because I saw a lot
of... I had a lot
of composers come in and work for me and they always wanted to dramatize
certain things and take it over the top sometimes and I didn't want it over the top.
«When everyone
thinks that [a
certain kind]
of advertising is the «right»
thing to do, that's when it has a terrible rate
of return,» says Scott Galloway, a marketing professor at the Stern School
of Business.
But I
think most will recognize that there are
certain things always and everywhere wrong (settling moral questions on the basis
of the most extreme hypothetical may be one
of them).
Sorry, I
thought certain things are just kind
of obvious to anyone with the capacity to actually
think for themselves.
Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't
think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't
think however that we should pray instead
of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists
think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead
of putting their faith in a God, I don't
think God will solve our problems, i
think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I
think that God created everything but not as a Magical
thing but stablishing
certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist
of Scientist the Mathematic
of Mathematics, the Physician
of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?
Which
things being without number in our mind itself, (the nature
of which mind is incapable
of being seen,) not to mention others, the very faith whereby we believe, or the
thought whereby we know that we either believe any
thing, or believe not, being as it is altogether alien from the sight
of those eyes; what so naked, so clear, what so
certain is there to the inner eyes
of our minds?
The child «knows»
certain things, gathers an extensive inner record
of tons
of information coming to him / her via his / her senses and
thoughts, even before he / she is introduced to the concept
of words and learns the alphabet.
To
thought (intellectus), Maritain added «a
certain, nonconceptual, intuitive, connatural, experiential» type
of knowledge that he calls «Poetic Knowledge,» and to
things (rei) he added complex meditations on the beauty
of being that Aquinas had only partially explored.
Though I do
think that many alcoholics don't have direct control over their situation because
of a chemical dependancy that is produced due to an individuals genetics, personality, and levels
of dependency (which is not a negative
thing per say, it's just that
certain people do have genetic predispositions to addiction).
Aristotle replies that it would be better to say that it is the man (i.e., the composite
of soul and body) who is pained andpleased, perceives and
thinks, even though there is a
certain sense in saying that the soul does these
things since the movement originates in the soul [408b7].
All I can say is that I've experienced what I've experienced, that there are
certain things that can not be made known without first hand experience, and that if you happen to find yourself in a situation where you want to know or need to know something that can not be made known without first - hand experience there option
of trying out for yourself and see if you like it, although I don't
think there is any money - back guarantee, but then again I didn't have to pay any trial offer either.
In particular, the denial that epistemology is wholly prior to ontology; the denial that we can have an absolutely
certain starting point; the idea that those elements
of experience
thought by most people to be primitive givens are in fact physiologically, personally, and socially constructed; the idea that all
of our descriptions
of our observations involve culturally conditioned interpretations; the idea that our interpretations, and the focus
of our conscious attention, are conditioned by our purposes; the idea that the so - called scientific method does not guarantee neutral, purely objective, truths; and the idea that most
of our ideas do not correspond to
things beyond ourselves in any simple, straightforward way (for example, red as we see it does not exist in the «red brick» itself).
«I
think if we change that step and really become students
of each other's narratives and ask questions about why people perceive
certain things in a
certain way instead
of jumping to judgment, then I
think we'll be better equipped to have more diversity in local churches.»
But on the other hand, when in talking about sin one talks only
of such sins, it is so easily forgotten that in a way it may be all right, humanly speaking, with respect to all such
things up to a
certain point, and yet the whole life may be sin, the well - known kind
of sin: glittering vices, willfulness, which either spiritlessly or impudently continues to be or wills to be unaware in what an infinitely deeper sense a human self is morally under obligation to God with respect to every most secret wish and
thought, with respect to quickness in comprehending and readiness to follow every hint
of God as to what His will is for this self.
But I don't
think that we should celebrate the death
of a
certain someone because I believe that death is a sensitive issue, and if we are celebrating death, then we are doing the same
thing Osama was doing to begin with.
It is
certain that he did not, though the germ
of it is there in his
thinking of God as the Creator whose presence and care are manifest in even the smallest
things of his creation.
I am not
certain that this idea is exactly found in Scripture, but regardless
of what the original founders
thought about the pursuit
of happiness, and whether or not it is actually taught in Scripture, the pursuit today is not so much happiness, but pleasure or personal fulfillment, even when such
things come at the expense
of others.
That Man is the product
of causes which had no prevision
of the end they were achieving; that his origin, his growth, his hopes and fears, his loves and his beliefs, are but the outcome
of accidental collocations
of atoms; that no fire, no heroism, no intensity
of thought and feeling, can preserve an individual life beyond the grave; that all the labours
of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness
of human genius, are destined to extinction in the vast death
of the solar system, and that the whole temple
of Man's achievement must inevitably be buried beneath the debris
of a universe in ruins — all these
things, if not quite beyond dispute, are yet so nearly
certain, that no philosophy which rejects them can hope to stand.
Neither
of us, I
think, was quite
certain just what contribution I might be making to the enterprise, but I was a reasonably educated and reasonably pious» though hardly properly observant» Jew who had worked for many years as an editor, and since Religion and Public Life had recently begun publishing First
Things, I suppose it was
thought that I was qualified to add some, albeit hardly scholarly, expertise to the enterprise.
I
think there are a lot
of things that we might as well take as
certain unless there is something which turns up to really make them doubtful.
When we are
thinking of things seen, it is our occipital convolutions that are active; when
of things heard, it is a
certain portion
of our temporal lobes; when
of things to be spoken, it is one
of our frontal convolutions.
I heard someone suggest yesterday that
certain apocryphal material was left out because it wasn't profitable for the faith... Just made me
think there were a few more
things that maybe shouldn't have made the cut... (besides the obvious that those negotiators
of the 3rd century probably didn't really care about not making Jesus a misogynist...)
That man is the product
of causes which had no prevision
of the end they were achieving; that his origin, his growth, his hopes and fears, his loves and his beliefs, are but the outcome
of accidental concatenations
of atoms; that no force, no heroism, no intensity
of thought or feeling, can presume an individual life beyond the grave; that all the labors
of the age, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noon - day brightness
of human genius, are destined to extinction in the vast death
of the solar system, and that the whole temple
of Man's achievement must inevitably be buried beneath the debris
of a universe in ruin... all these
things, if not quite beyond dispute, are yet so nearly
certain, that no philosophy which rejects them can hope to stand.
Whereas we usually
think of things or people as individuals to which events happen, he advocates the converse proposition that
things or persons are «
certain stabilities... in the flux
of events.
Given a
certain understanding
of each
of these I can
think of a number
of things I take to be wrong with them.
He added: «There are lots
of misconceptions about religion; people feel like they have to go somewhere and do
certain things to experience God, I
think it should be more accessible than that.
And it wasn't until Solzhenitsyn's Gulag Archipelago that French intellectuals admitted
certain truths.Still, Camus reintroduced several
things to public awareness that had dropped out
of progressive
thought.
Abraham looked up and saw three men standing nearby (Gen 18:2 NIV)»... Furthermore, there is a good reason to study the old Orient, the rituals and cultures
of the Middel East, especially at that time,,, i myself being Half Egyptian and having been raised there, am blessed with this foreknowledge for
certain things that are still the same way now as they were at th etime
of Jesus and earlier,,, where Men kiss to greet one another for example,,, so when King David talks about the love
of Jonathan being greater than that
of a woman,,, and at the same time knowing that the Hebrew litreature (as the Arabian culture to quite an extent still is) was very poetic and used éndless symbols and parabels to express an idea,,, one might do himself a favor not jumping to conclusions which satisfy only his very own ideas and
thoughts,,, the biggest problem with Bible interpretations lately is Verses ripped out
of the context and interpreted in such a way that has nothing to do with its original context... «To the law and to the testimony!
I'm going to do a big social media cull now (obviously not Ella) but there are a
certain few people who claim to be so positive, but really I
think there is a fine line between being positive (i.e. look at me, I've 3 kids, a full time job, a flat tummy, and I'm a healthy eater, non stop good doer, if you can do it I can too person) and just being annoying and making you feel inadequate as I can't juggle all
of those
things at all and constantly feel overwhelmed!!
They are just the
thought of thing I would set myself a
certain number on a plate then keep going back to the freezer for more!
Warm Potato + Pea Tendril Salad with Maple Tahini Dressing ~ I
think most
of us have those special
things that we always have to get when we go to
certain places that we love to frequent.
I
think as consumers we should be wary
of avoiding a
certain product simply due to skepticism — it's one
thing to recommend not using a product because it has scientifically been proven to cause harm; it's another to recommend not using a product because
of subjective reasons, such as how creepy the fact is that X. campestris is the culprit
of black rot on crucifers (or personal opinions
of the FDA)... yes, X. campestris is used to ferment sugars to produce xanthan gum, but the fact that it causes rotting
of crucifers is unrelated (and doesn't suddenly make xanthan gum harmful).
«I
think we all have an appreciation for a
certain quality
of life that's fostered by the city, but there are
things like nature and community that we value and can find out here,» she says.
I
think that everyone would like to believe that said abuse is a figment
of Evra's imagination, but with the matter already going to the FA and Evra claiming that he was referred to as «a
certain word» ten times or more,
things are obviously starting to spiral out
of control.
2
things; wenger has to take massive crtisism for favoritism with
certain players and for spending latley on less than whats needed e.g why play ozil, ramsey, walcott, when they havnt performed, anyone can see a front 3
of welbeck, sanchez and perez would cause havoc Xhaka wtf he cant takle, is not mobile enough and has the temper and the decision making skills
of a
of a suicide victim, why did nt we go in for Kante less money and 10x a better player or even Schneiderlin
thinking about what happens after wenger ask yourself this will we win the league next year with wenger then ask if we got the right manager next year would we win the league
The team was built in a way that we were waiting for a
certain type
of striker and I
think now everybody knows that Chelsea did the right
thing in waiting for him and not going into the market in the summer
of 2013 or January.»
You saying it's fans like me who are settlers is totally pointless.In my comments I never said I was settling no didn't want change.The way you said «stupid team» and «coach out
of his depths» is what I was referring to.In fact I want a change today and I'm tired
of seeing
thing go on like this so don't come here and pretend like you are the only one who wants a change and
think I'm part
of those who settle for this.When I also see people predicting Arsenal's positions and they are so
certain about it it makes me laugh and
think of them as naive.Trust me there's no wrong for a person to predict a team's position but it's naive for a person to be
certain about it and people come and quote sayings like «no one knows tomorrow».
Then it would be that he sometimes would
think of baseball, the small
things he missed about it,
things that would pop into his mind for no reason: a
certain glove, the feel
of a ball and bat, a buttoning
of a shirt, the sunlight.
Abdul - Jabbar says he started
thinking about coaching a few years ago when the Philadelphia 76ers brought him in to work with then rookie center Shawn Bradley, and he saw that his student, though eager to learn, «didn't know
certain things that every pivot man should have tattooed on the back
of his arm.»
«In recent months we have all been struck by
certain images that I
thought were a
thing of the past,» he said.
«I
think Arsenal have a
certain way
of doing
things.
He doesn't play games, a lot
of managers do
certain things... I
think if you're in the team you like him and if you're out the team, you also like him!
Although I'm
certain breastfeeding has some protective factors against bedtime death, I
think one
thing that McKenna shows in his research is that breastfeeding mothers are more aware
of their infants at night (due to the bonding that comes with breastfeeding) and that the babies adjust their breathing patterns to the mother, again due to the bonding.
Once he gets into the routine
of doing
things in a
certain order, he won't have to waste time
thinking about what to do next.
Just
think about it: when you're pregnant, you can't drink, smoke, eat
certain things and more
things you can't do, but when it's time to give birth it is suddenly ok to give the woman a bunch
of drugs?
Didn't get a job until I was 21, didn't get, my license, move out
of home and it really did a number on me, I was also picked on quite a lot in High School as I was over weight which I
think affected me socially in terms
of I have a minor case
of social anxiety, it's not debilitating but I do notice it and it affects
certain things.
I am planning a home birth so if I do end up in hospital its because I absolutely have to be there or its an emergency situation where a C - section is called for I going to be meeting those people pretty much for the first time [laughs] and I don't know what they are, how receptive they would to something like this, so you know there are
certain things you
think might be easier to ask for verses asking
of all
of this
things, perhaps you know, maybe it doesn't have to be all or nothing but I don't know are there
certain things that you
think might be good for me to ask for in lieu
of asking for everything.
I
think a bigger problem is that when a
certain type appropriates the discourse
of post modernism and finds themselves with a Ph.D, they then claim expertise in entirely unrelated topics - like childbirth, Postmodernism might have some quite interesting
things to say about the way the dominant discourse comes to be framed — don't
think it would be terribly reliable on the way people react to risk — foregrounding the risks
of things that are disapproved
of, and minimising others.