Sentences with phrase «think of correct answers»

We might think of correct answers as an example of learning.

Not exact matches

A well - phrased series of Socratic questions challenges you to think about why you believe your «answer» to be correct, and to supply some sort of evidence to back up your beliefs...

Answer; You are correct, I thought more about the legality of the term «hate speech» that the LGBT community uses to science their opposition which some are valid but not all.

But Pedro, Christians are the only people that seem to think they know the answer, even though there is no evidence whatsoever that the answer they're so fond of is correct.

If you got 2 out of 3 answers correct, or if you're just highly intrigued by the thought of a coffee / Girl Scout Cookie mashup, then get thee to a blender stat.

I think the note from the linked answer regarding the Hatch act may be useful here though, if it is correct -LRB-» the Hatch Act explicitly protects the rights of federal employees (even «further restricted» ones) to express their opinions on politics -LSB-...] Being critical of the President is not a restricted activity»).

Ed Miliband has at least taken advice and given the correct answer to the strike we do not like strikes and we think they should get around the table but we do understand why people are striking, they are striking because they are agreeing with labour the cost of living crises is attacking the low paid and the professional teachers and nurses.

This strategy challenges them to operate at a higher level of thinking than when they can share only the «correct» answer.

In addition, the site offers information about the derivation of the word, asks a related thought - provoking question, and explains the correct answer.

More likely - in fact certainly - employees will be asked to prove their worth by answering subjective questions, or more correctly forming an opinion about a subjective question, which by definition does not have a correct answer, only a well thought out opinion or point - of - view.

If the answer is to «Millennials», then you've certainly targeted the correct group: According to scientists, the age of smartphones has left humans with such a short attention span even a goldfish can hold a thought for longer!

Powerpoint presentation where students select the colour they think is the correct answer to the question and hold up a piece of matching coloured card before the counter hits 0.

The NEA admits that some methods might be considered more efficient, but points out that the correct answer can be found using multiple methods and that «by allowing students to think flexibly about numbers, we encourage them to «own'the math forever, instead of «borrowing» until class is over.»

So we get into the middle of student processes, correcting and nudging and answering questions before we need to, because that's what we think teaching is — doing things.

Many think the essence of math is to get the correct answers, and fast.

Moreover, teachers generally listen for the «correct» answer instead of listening for what they can learn about the students» thinking; as Davis (1997) says, they listen evaluatively rather than interpretively.

Instead of correcting all sheets looking for the same answers, surface and deep thinking were probed at different levels based on where the students were at the time of the teacher responses.

Since these tests are mostly multiple - choice, students focus on rote learning to identify correct answers instead of learning to think and apply their knowledge.»

There may not be «one right answer» in an examination like this, but what might be actually worse is that students can be actively coached to submit «plug and play» answers which mimic a style of thinking but which have no depth and, worse, can be nonsensical just so long as they hit the correct rubric markers.

These higher - order thinking challenges will have more than one correct answer and students are encouraged to explore a variety of options and work problems in different ways to arrive at a conclusion.

In the first stage of your work think up the correct thesis statement that reflects the main conception of the research and answers on the main question of the work;

9.62 percent thought it was the opposite of the correct answer, while 33.67 percent believed there was no difference and that both inquiries have equal impacts.

I will try to get some more specific answers for you and either correct or fill out this article, but I think the main gist of the argument is that there are other factors at play and the simple lack of a perfect correlation does not mean that CO2 is not the primary driver of the general warming seen since 1900.

The problem is many of the questions and what the Yale people think are the correct answers are wrong.

We are all agreed, I think, that there is no unambiguously correct answer to Nic's hypothetical problem, and by clear inference, there is no unambiguously correct answer to the real problem of abstracting a posterior pdf for calendar date from RC dating.

They simply think that science has utterly failed to produce the correct answer on everything from basic thermodynamics to analysis of temperature station data, that scientists chase research grant money by producing answers useful for the expansion of government power, that every single mechanism intended to prevent corruption and fraud has failed and of course that scientists are individually and collectively involved in a conscious effort to lie to the public.

I think the Court is correct in taking this approach, because the provisions of the Directive, in particular article 10 («worship in private or in public»), do not give any indication of an answer otherwise, nor do the provisions regarding religious freedom in the EU Charter or the ECHR.

I think that the correct answer is the last one but I'm not sure; I suppose that in order to a baby to be acknowledged as a new born citizen in the country of the mom or the dad she or he should be registered in each country.

In some cases, you may be correct; after all, with in - class driver training, they get face - to - face interaction with the instructor and other new drivers, and get to experience the learning curve with other teens just like them who are learning with them, and they get to hear answers to questions that they might not have thought of.

If you're having trouble thinking of the correct response, you can stall a bit by not answering in the form of a question, and Alexa will remind you.

I would submit that this form is most valuable to lawyers who end up litigating on behalf of litigants claiming damages or defending their positions against same based upon not only dishonest and misleading statements that most assuredly appear on these SPIS smooth deal - facilitator documents, but also upon assumed honestly held but nevertheless misleading statements (the seller «thinks» he / she knows the correct answer to a question, but in fact does «not» know for sure, and guesses... yes... or no) that can ultimately lead to an expensive court case.