Sentences with phrase «think of other issues»

Can you think of other issues related to student and staff diversity that might affect the efficacy of specific aspects of professional development?

I can't think of any other issue where the laws on the books are inconsistent with the wishes of three - quarters of British Columbians,» said Angus Reid vice-president Mario Canseco at the release of the numbers.

Not exact matches

«I think we're substantially inoculated from the other issues that are happening in the industry... Just objectively, we're much more of a media company in that way than pure tech.

«I don't think he does our issue any favors by making it so incredibly jingoistic and bombastic,» said Scott Paul, president of the Alliance for American Manufacturing, a group that allies domestic steelmakers and other manufacturers with the United Steelworkers union.

If you examine your deeper thoughts, you'll most likely become aware of the limiting beliefs that contribute to all of the other issues.

«We wanted to make sure that our own country was part of the conversation about global health issues in two ways — one, making sure that we're not thinking of it as issues that affect other people that don't have anything to do with us, but also acknowledging that we can learn so much from what has gone well or new models that are effective in other countries,» Bush tells Business Insider.

«The minute you walk in the door, you're encouraged to think about these high - level issues,» Siegel says of APT and reports that when it came to recruiting him, «the amount of effort was staggering in comparison to other firms.»

We think the threat of losing delegate representation should incentivize red - state Democrats — and other Democratic leaders — to prioritize issues that directly affect black communities on the state and federal levels.

There are two sources of demand for tokens: From people who need them to redeem services from the company who issued them, and from other investors who think the token will rise in price like a stock or a currency.

The relevant difference between Finance and HR is that Finance gains prestige by bringing to bear the tools of quantitative analysis; HR issues, on the other hand, are typically harder to quantify and turn into math, leading many people to think of them as «mushy.»

On the other hand, the same survey showed that 42 percent of the fund managers believe central bank policies will be the biggest driver of the dollar this year, while just 11 percent thought trade issues would be.

Then, there were others where I thought, «I don't want to know about some of the potential issues that are going to come up.

But I think we are beginning to get into that kind of turning process where there are those broader issues, those that have tended to have assets, be they salaried pension holders or those that own property or other real assets, have tended to do better than the millennial generation and I think that we are seeing that in some elements of political protest.

I think that all of the Bitcoin users and developers need to sit down, think this through and get a decision done about this matter as fast as possible before the community really starts moving their trust to the other alternate coins that have already solved this issue.

Mark Whitmore: This is Mark Whitmore, I keep forgetting we have two Mark's on the line here, and Chris you absolutely interpreted what I was trying to say correctly, and kind of to follow up a little bit, I think one of the things that the other Mark pointed out is the issue of timing, and whereas the two prevailing investing paradigms out there seem to be this notion of efficient market theory which attempts to just buy and hold the market no matter what, completely price indifferent.

«We have a president who has not demonstrated a great deal of patience on other issues so I think a process that continues to drag on into 2018 will increase the likelihood that the president issues a withdrawal from the NAFTA.»

He objected that the issue of contraception was «superfluous» compared to others; he asked what right the priest had to tell him what to do («judge not lest you be judged,» Hannity instructed); and he expressed shock at the thought that anyone might deprive him of taking Communion just because he was deciding for himself what it means to be Catholic.

I think a lot of things could be glossed over in this story... what was the real relationship like between John and James, did Lucas» other church reject him or did Lucas do the rejecting, and how much shame from the parents had to do with that decision, the issue of race, the issue of disability... I'm a pessimist so I think of these things.

Yes, hawaii, and I think quite often they do not realize how ridiculous they sound when one (versus the other) will disenfranchise an entire group of people, yet both will say that particular issue is not really a disagreement because it's not a «central» tenet of Christianity.

I think the other issue is that a lot of Christian ministers suffer from mental health problems but feel unable to share those with their congregation or even more privately.»

I find that most of my Christian friends who talk about homosexuality are either determined to not think about the issue because of tradition and fear or are on the other end and choose not to think about the issue because the pressure of contemporary culture (in our part of the world) is to equate my sexuality with the colour of my skin which is, in light of history, a silly equation but we should just adjust our understanding to accomodate.

Process thought deals more directly with some of the issues than do the fundamental principles of the other groups.

While I definitely agree that his response is great in many circumstances and (without knowing the context of that conversation) may have been the perfect thing to say at that moment, I think calling this statement «a template that can be used to respond to questions concerning sexuality, gender and other important issues» reduces a very complex issue down to a very simple response that doesn't really answer any questions for anyone.

-- some missionaries may have a lifestyle that is more common to their home culture than appropriate, but I know many others that have made financial and personal commitments that impress me and should not be ignored; I think we should continue to honor that — the reality of the $ 10K that we all would want to invest in local evangelists often is only available after a «loo - see - visit» (or more) from a Western missionary who returns «home» for fundraising; that maybe sad, but is the reality — one serious issue to address in the African churches is the «colonialism» that is imposed -LRB-!)

«Never will a work of man have a good issue if we do not think of the souls whom it is given us to help, and of the life between soul and soul, and of our life with them and of their lives with each other.

I don't think it's the purity movement that is the problem so much as those who use the shame of such an issue to control others.

Finally, although the spiritual awareness other thought increased, particularly in her latter years, the centrality of spiritual - value issues in all human growth was not emphasized explicitly in her therapeutic system.

They share some useful thoughts on a range of issues, in particular regarding human uniqueness in comparison with other animals, and the neuroscience of religiousness.

But when it comes to some of these other issues, I don't think the question is «who is right and who is wrong» but rather, «does this interpretation help us look more like Jesus?»

Others think that overturning Roe would ban abortion everywhere, instead of returning the issue to the states.

It may be just my opinion but I think the reason all of you have so many issues with religion is you are trying to look at them in the context of other people and politics.

As for the «narrow public witness» against which John Murdock rightly cautions, I really don't think «prioritizing» equals «ignoring,» such that to prioritize the defense of religious freedom and the right to life excludes other issues from the Church's social witness and public policy advocacy.

Funny how we criticize and mock other countries that have governments based on religious fanaticism (i.e. Iran) while a large segment of our voters are also religious fanatics who seem to think their view is the only «morally correct» way to feel about an issue (i.e.abortion).

The culmination of a long process of thinking and rethinking can be seen in the May / June issue of The Other Side, a young - evangelical activist magazine.

I don't think NP suggests that he isn't exploring, dismantling, erecting, prodding, or setting up boundaries... I think at the heart of the issue is the intention behind it (as far as we are able to access our own or others intentions, why often remain a partial mystery).

Stress, work deadlines, housework, busy schedules, pregnancy, kids, financial issues, health issues and any other thing you can think of that is normal in life all affect our sex drives.

The background assumption of this book means, finally, that so far as its content is concerned the best hope of saying things of general relevance to persons involved in all types of theological schooling today lies in making some particular and fairly concrete proposals that may turn out to be directly pertinent only to a few types of theological schools but may provoke and help other persons in other types of schools to think through these issues for themselves.

As such, I think for strategic and clarity purposes we ought to keep the scope of those issues which are «pro-life» more narrowly focused on bioethical concerns, while coming up with other ways of describing our positions elsewhere.

The questions about religion and public life, those calling for «public» discussion, no longer focus on the verifiability of religious speech but concern quite other issues: methods of understanding and describing the religious realities, old and new, that we see appearing around us; useful criteria for assessing these religions and for defining and comprehending this new set of powers in our public life; and ways of protecting vital religious groups from the excesses of the public reaction to them, and protecting the public from the excesses of powerful religious groups — hardly questions a secular culture had thought it would have to take seriously!

While some praised the Netflix show for its daring depiction of mental health struggles and substance abuse issues, others thought it went too far, was unfair to its subjects and even damaging toward its viewers.

Morgenthau: «The great overriding issue that we must face in our government and that other governments must face as well lies in the discrepancy between our conventional modes of thought and action on the one hand and the unprecedented novelty of the objective conditions under which we live.

Vice chair, Sue Monckton - Rickett told Premier: «It is a fact; I think that lots of counselling agencies across the country in January do start to see people coming in - perhaps more than at any other time in the year - with relationship issues.»

Advocates of one tradition learn how to think in terms of another tradition» — and then they learn to identify the unresolved issues characteristic of the other tradition.

This conflict has emerged between the liberal and militant activist pastors and denominational leaders, on the one hand, and a large body of more conservative laymen, on the other hand, who think the church should stick to spiritual matters and stop meddling in politics and «social» issues.

Many people we know think it mostly has to do with religion, politics, conservative positions on «culture war» issues, and an odd assortment of other things.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

According to this way of thinking, one of the issues for sexual ethics is how the love of two people for each other affects their relationship with God.

Abortion rates have fallen 12 percent since 2010 according to a recent survey, and 49 percent of Americans think abortion is morally wrong, much higher than on other life - issues.

ANy higher being who doesn't have severe psychological issues of his own to worry about would know who and what he is and not care what any finite beings think one way or the other about him.

The responder may begin with a phrase such as «Let's see if I understand how it looks to you...» and then he paraphrases what he thinks the other is expressing, (d) Switch roles and try to state each other's position and feelings on one issue on which you have obvious differences of viewpoint, (e) Practice nonverbal communication by attempting to get messages through to each other with the use of touch, facial expressions, body movements, gestures, eye communication.