Sentences with phrase «think of public domain»

To sum up: it is a mistake to think of public domain books as an easy way to earn money.

Not exact matches

The matter erupted into the public domain approximately two and a half years ago, when one of the undercover officers, identified as Mark Kennedy, had second thoughts and «changed sides» in the middle of a long and expensive trial.

He said common sense tells us that you ask or go with the people who have already been to where you hope to get to, adding that unlike the NDC that has got people who are behind the scenes and doing the thinking for the party, the current crop of the NPP think only those who are in the public domain talking are good for winning election.

«I hope that now this information is in the public domain it will entail both a downward pressure on overall expenditure and also make MPs think twice about the environmental impact of their journeys and how it could be lessened.»

«It is completely an unnecessary question but I think it reflects the incompetence of this government because the information the President calls a secret is actually in the public domain.»

Eminent domain — ask the average person what it means, and he is likely to think of the government taking property for a high public purpose — a school, park, highway or library.

What Trevor I think misses, and what all the ultras like Rob and Atul can not face up to was that the dislike of the typical New Labour MP which has been out there in the public domain for a while had infected the internal party electorate also.

I think that after November, we were talking internally, because there was a lot of discussion out there in the public domain about, what's the role of the federal government, especially when it comes to advancing school choice.

Personally, I don't think it will take nearly 40 years to make eBooks of all of the public domain books, newspapers and magazines, etc., that are easy to find, not to forget to add in music, artworks, etc..

As you may know, Project Gutenberg of Europe just celebrated the completion of their 400th eBook, and I think you will be greatly surprised to find out how many of these are included in the U.S. public domain listings.

While some think we could, or even should, release our work with some kind of copyright notice, instead Standard Ebooks dedicates the entirety of each of our ebook files, including markup, cover art, and everything in between, to the public domain.

All of our ebooks are texts that are thought to be in the public domain in the United States.

And while the mission of LibriVox is, I think, noble and good: «To make all public domain books available in audio, for free on the Internet»...

** Oddly, neither Anne of Windy Poplars nor Anne of Ingleside is in public domain in the U.S. I say «oddly,» since they are numbers 4 and 6 of an 8 - book series; logically, you would think it would be books 7 and 8 which were not in public domain.

Honestly, the more reactions I see the more I think that those fanfic writers who want to make money by writing are already trying — by writing original fic alongside it, or sometimes by filing the serial numbers off their fanworks, or by writing fanfic of public domain works.

As for the e-book store, I think B&N and Kobo both have very good e-book stores (ahead of Sony, Apple, and Google), but Amazon is still the undisputed leader, with the most titles available (ignore B&N's marketing talk of having the «largest» e-book store: they count public domain titles that Amazon doesn't, even though they are easily available for the Kindle as well).

I guess the fact that I bought shares in EBIX well after the short thesis was put into the public domain should tell you what I think of the short thesis.

In a thought - provoking group show at Priska C. Juschka Fine Art, entitled No, Trespassing, twelve artists examine the notion of contemporary security systems and Big Brother's supervision of the public domain anew.

Think about eminent domain, zoning, wetlands development regulations and the like, all of which impose limitations in the name of the common good and the public interest.

The public acceptance of climate - change conspiracy transcends the typical wide - ranging domain of conspiratorial belief; a 2013 investigation by Lewandowsky et al [8] found that while subjects who subscribed to conspiracist thought tended to reject all scientific propositions they encountered, those with strong traits of conservatism or pronounced free - market world views only tended towards rejecting scientific findings with regulatory implications at odds with their ideological position.

Ironically I'm thinking maybe the public domain movie subtitles are actually the only ones they legally «own», as they're not in the uncomfortable position of working on top of copyrighted data.

In summary, I think variations of the I (heart) NY logo are indeed in the public domain, and I suspect the original logo may be as well.

As such, I don't think the ProCD case applies in my situation due to the qualitative differences between licensing CD - ROMs with vast amounts of information that has been compiled and which has value added search features added to it versus the «sale» of single copies of public domain sheet music (however, a library that creates and licenses for sale a CD - ROM with hundreds of individual pieces of public domain sheet music might be protected by the principles in ProCD since a court might recognize and protect the library's investment of time and money in creating the CD - ROM, but even in that situation, if the library is not otherwise adding value - added information above and beyond the public domain content, it is not obvious that ProCD applies).

I think that any publicly funded content should (within, say, 5 years of its creation) be released to the public domain.

For example, I think that after a golfer swings in front of a few people that might qualify as a public disclosure and, therefore, make the swing public domain and, therefore, un-patentable.

I think it is quite reasonable that courts protect the CD - ROM developer in this case by prohibiting further copying of the CD - ROM by customers in order to protect the investment of time and cost the developer made in compiling the entire CD - ROM and to protect the «value - added» information the developer provides through the compilation of public domain data.

I always thought the Internet was developed by the Department of Defense as the ARPANET project, therefore it should be in the public domain.

Further to Simon's recent post on the possible establishment of a «public domain» registry / database: I think this is great news if it happens.

For beyondblue, putting the issue of everyday racial discrimination squarely in the public domain and asking everyone to stop and think about their actions is an effective way to create a public discussion to trigger behavioural change.