But their mistake may have been to
think of the human brain as a computer rather than a biological entity that must solve the problem of how to compare apples, pears and plums.
Consider this analogy —
think of the human brain like the earth and water like trauma.
Not exact matches
Kurzweil has appeared in Inc. magazine numerous times (he let us scan his
brain and told us how to predict the future) and is the leading advocate
of a school
of thought called the singularity, which says, essentially, that
humans will eventually turn into robots and live forever.
«Two adjacent
brain regions allow
humans to build new
thoughts using a sort
of conceptual algebra, mimicking the operations
of silicon computers that represent variables and their changing values.»
Yes, Musk's choice
of words was poor, but his
brain is too busy
thinking about Hyperloops and colonizing Mars to worry about how our puny
human brains might misinterpret him, okay?
«Over time I
think we will probably see a closer merger
of biological intelligence and digital intelligence,» said Musk according to a CNBC report, adding that «some high bandwidth interface to the
brain will be something that helps achieve a symbiosis between
human and machine intelligence and maybe solves the control problem and the usefulness problem.»
Twitter today is taking another step to build up its machine learning muscle, and also potentially to improve how it delivers photos and videos across its apps: the company is acquiring Magic Pony Technology, a company based out
of London that has developed techniques
of using neural networks (systems that essentially are designed to
think like
human brains) and machine learning to provide expanded data for images — used, for example, to enhance a picture or video taken on a mobile phone; or to help develop graphics for virtual reality or augmented reality applications.
There is still no explanation for the spontaneous origin
of the universe, as well as the advanced cognition
of the
brain (chemicals and genetics reveal general trends, but no one knows how complete
thoughts are actually formed, nor emotions or personalities); creation and the
human conscious, the two fundamental focuses
of religion.
A modern banana, an ant, a bumble bee, a monkey (the ones you
think we came from), and the
human brain (among a million other things created) disprove the theory
of evolution in just one sentence worth
of their description.
Rabbi Neuberger asserted that «it's really important that one accepts that... new scientific research has taught us... that the
human embryo is not as unique as we
thought before... We do have to
think differently about the «unique quality
of human embryos» in the way that Peter Saunders is saying... The miracle
of creation... may have to be explained somewhat differently... Our
human brains are given to us by God... to better the life
of other
human beings... and if this technology can do it..., and I don't believe that anybody is going to research beyond fourteen days, then so be it, lets do it.»
I understand that the
human brain, or mind, is capable
of far more than you
think.
Lucretius
thought that the soul nestled in the
human breast; Descartes located it in the pineal gland; and process theologian John Cobb, following Alfred North Whitehead, hopes to find mind wandering as a thread through the «interstices
of the
brain,» But if we are truly dealing with metaphysics, then the mind and the soul, like the risen Christ, will not be anywhere, but holistically related to the body.
Be proud to be a
human, use that amazingly complex
brain of yours to figure out all
of the mysteries
of the universe and stop
thinking without being honest and critical
of your ideas.
Did you ever
think when you are typing words, gathering your
thoughts, deciding / choosing what to say, and using the best intellect you can find in your
brain; that you are conscious in these
thoughts / decisions, and that your eyes / hands /
brain synapses, are all part
of the lense (
of the
human body) that you are able to see and control to the limitations inherent in its essence?
Deities and afterlives are, to me, an absolutely natural side effect
of the
human brain's ability for abstract
thought.
Don't you
think that it's more likely what people call the voice
of god is simply a complex awareness created by the
human brain which has been evolving its ability to recognize patterns for millions
of years?
Without the process
of biological evolution, which produced the
human brain, there would be no sanctified souls; and similarly, without the evolution
of collective
thought, through which alone the plenitude
of human consciousness can be attained on earth, how can there be a consummated Christ?
No, I
think he is actually arguing that the Holy Spirit is just an articulation
of some organic process within the
human brain.
Under the guise
of the scientific notion, I defy science to reproduce the
human brain, create DNA that matches with another person, create a universe that has order, make
humans with all the complexities all the same with identical DNA factors, and every
human with the same finger prints as another, and when an atheistic scientist can do that, I will rethink my level
of thoughts in regards to God.
So for example, in my case and that
of other persons whose minds dissociate when we engage in intense / deep spiritual practices like intense / deep prayer, meditation, fasting etc and we hear voices, hallucinate, see visions, experience
thought insertions, automatic channelling just like a spirit medium as well as other psychic phenomena (clairvoyance etc), and the mind dissociation makes some persons mentally and emotionally unstable; our minds enter an altered state
of consciousness just like those
of the Buddhist monks but in our case the altered state
of our
brains results in psychotic and psychic symptoms being induced (interestingly, some persons who are ignorant
of how the
human brain functions chalk up these experiences to demonic attack)......... are these psychotic, psychic experiences which persons like myself experience a gift from God as well?
He called his view «materialistic,» in so far as «it does not allow the possibility
of any
human thought without a
brain and a movement in this
brain.»
His religious difficulty came from the kind
of theology he found around him, its habit
of identifying words in a book (written by
human hands and
thought by
human brains) with the words
of God, also from the habit
of playing fast and loose with the dangerously ambiguous concepts
of omnipotence and omniscience, and taking these more seriously than any definite affirmation
of the freedom
of creatures to make decisions that are their own and not God's.
Finite
human freedom can be realized only in something objective, even if this were to be
thought of as consisting merely in
brain cells, conceptual mechanisms, associations, that is, basically in social or psychological models
of thought, or if it were to belong — but only seemingly — to a merely inner realm
of thought.
No doubt it is true, scientifically speaking, that no distinct center
of superhuman consciousness has yet appeared on earth (at least in the living world) for which it may be claimed or predicted that one day it will exercise a centralizing function, in relation to associated
human thought, similar to the role
of the individual «I» in relation to the cells
of the
brain.
The moment within the progress
of the evolution
of the
human body that this happens would indeed, we
think, be related to
brain size.
For us these are the components
of reality that explain the nature
of the world, the phenomenon
of life within it, and even how we
human organisms
think through our
brains.
And finally, at the extreme end
of the known spectrum, comes the
thinking incandescence
of the
human brain.
The extremely rich (experiential) data provided by the
human brain, accordingly, can be
thought to allow the emergence
of a higher - level actuality, which we call the mind.
At the same time, claiming to know what God is like and how he would react to topical issues like gay marriage is ludicrous as well... by definition, if he is God, he doesn't
think along the lines
of a
human brain, so we will never be able to understand him.
So termination
of a pregnancy before
brain development is not evil, and can not be compared to slaughtering
of millions
of thinking, conscious,
human beings.
While I am not aware
of significant discussions
of this issue among process thinkers, Matthew Fox and Brian Swimme, who though not directly influenced by process
thought nonetheless share the relational vision, have incorporated elements
of this, particularly through the use
of art, in their own education process in order to stimulate the «right»
brain, the intuitive and imaginative capacities
of the
human mind.
The cosmic tide may at one time have seemed to be immobilized, lost in the vast reservoir
of living forms; but through the ages the level
of consciousness was steadily rising behind the barrier, until finally, by means
of the
human brain (the most «centro - complex» organism yet achieved to our knowledge in the universe) there has occurred, at a first ending
of time, the breaking
of the dykes, followed by what is now in progress, the flooding
of Thought over the entire surface
of the biosphere.
If you
think it can't you have no knowledge
of how the
human brain works.
It is our ability to
think and reason that makes us
human and distinguishes us from all other animals, a piece
of tissue, and a baby from an embryo with no measurable
brain waves.
Along with dualistic mythology several developments in scientific
thought since the seventeenth century have contributed to the exorcism
of mind from nature: first, there is the cosmography
of classical (Newtonian) physics picturing our world as composed
of inanimate, unconscious bits
of «matter» needing only the brute laws
of inertia to explain their action; second, the Darwinian theory
of evolution with its emphasis on chance, waste and the apparent «impersonality»
of natural selection; third, the laws
of thermodynamics (and particularly the second law) with the allied cosmological interpretation that our universe is running out
of energy available to sustain life, evolution and
human consciousness; fourth, the geological and astronomical disclosure
of enormous tracts
of apparently lifeless space and matter in the universe; fifth, the recent suggestions that life may be reducible to an inanimate chemical basis; and, finally, perhaps most shocking
of all, the suspicion that mind may be explained exhaustively in terms
of mindless
brain chemistry.
It is for this reason that utopian
thinking led some
of its modern promoters, such as Arthur Koestler and Carl Sagan, to propose ways
of «improving»
human beings by biological manipulation such as surgical removal
of certain centers in the
brain or by genetic engineering to remove «bad» genes.
AS funny as it is to
think of, a soul, yes, it requires an amount
of faith — which by the way is found in
brain... the place where
thoughts are found, well maybe not for you but the rest
of the
human race.
They'd come up with some stomach - churning idea that no demon could have
thought of in a thousand years, some dark and mindless unpleasantness that only a fully - functioning
human brain could conceive, then shout «The Devil Made Me Do It» and get the sympathy
of the court when the whole point was that the Devil hardly ever made anyone do anything.
There is something wrong with a scientific approach that
thinks it has to be proven with randomized experiments that a paltry
human - made substance doesn't match up with the elixir
of human breast milk (thousands
of ingredients in the right proportions for that particular baby to build the
brain, body, immune system).
They are
thought to be part
of the reason why the
human brain has developed advanced cognitive abilities beyond that
of most other mammals.
The fact that they could do so suggests that the ability to
think in an abstract way may be more common in nature than we might expect, and not just restricted to
humans and a handful
of animals with big
brains.
Degenerative
brain diseases like mad cow disease (officially known as bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or BSE), scrapie in sheep, and vCJD in
humans are
thought to be caused by prions, misfolded versions
of a normal cellular protein called PrPC.
The FOXP2 gene is
thought to have played a role in the evolution
of the
human brain and the development
of language.
«It seems the serotonin helps respond to the rhythmic movement
of the worm in different ways, similar to how serotonin is
thought to drive arousal in the
human brain,» said Collins.
Evidence that animal pheromones don't always work in they way we
thought, backed up by a growing number
of brain - imaging studies in
humans, is convincing some researchers that we really do make and respond to pheromones.
- Cognitive Neuroscience The Cognitive Neuroscience emphasis seeks highly innovative and interdisciplinary proposals aimed at advancing a rigorous understanding
of how the
human brain supports
thought, perception, affect, action, social processes, and other aspects
of cognition and behavior, including how such processes develop and change in the
brain and through evolutionary time.
Implicit in my assertion that computers will eventually be capable
of the same kind
of perception, cognition and
thought as
humans is the idea that a sufciently advanced and sophisticated articial system — for example, an electronic one — can be made and programmed to do the same thing as the
human nervous system, including the
brain.
And similarly neuroscience, revolutionised by the capacity
of PET scanning techniques to observe for the first time the
brain «in action», promised to clarify the physical basis
of the
human mind,
thinking, memorising, perceiving and interpreting the world «out there».
In his latest book, Adam Piore explores how bioengineers are harnessing the latest technologies to unlock untapped abilities in the
human body and mind, like translating neural
brain patterns
of thoughts into written words
The laws
of physics may well prevent the
human brain from evolving into an ever more powerful
thinking machine