Sentences with phrase «think on current evidence»

«I think Tony Blair who took us into the Iraq War was deeply problematic but I don't think on current evidence that Ed Miliband is as problematic as Tony Blair was.»

Not exact matches

The thinking part comes later, when you expand on your answers, providing the evidence for your current attainments and deciding what actions you need to take to improve areas of weakness.

Based on current fossil evidence, paleoanthropologists think the panin and hominid lines diverged roughly 5.4 million years ago.

The thinking there is that since there hasn't been much evidence of the «Great Cataclysm» much of anywhere else in the rest of the Solar system, at least based on current data, and the impactors that created the great basins must have originated near Earth.

The switch once the fight has shifted from adoption to implementation creates the impression that these folks make whatever argument they think will help them prevail in the current debate rather than relying on principle, evidence, and intellectually serious policy discussion.

The fact that certain analytical conclusions about observed climate change, attribution to human causes, in particular the energy system and deforestation, projected greater climate change in the future, observed impacts of climate change on natural and human systems, and projected very disruptive consequences in the future given our current trajectory, is not due to «group think» but rather to a generally shared analysis based on evidence.

The Royal Society has misrepresented current thinking on climate change by presenting new theories as established facts and leaving out evidence that doesn't support man made global warming dogma, a group of climate scientists has claimed.

But sorry, I think I'll hold onto my current opinion on that matter till I see proper evidence (not just more words, I have read many millions in last few years and they could never do more than get me to step one a long ago), but thanks for the reply and your thoughts.

I think there would be evidence somewhere, and if not in the ocean currents, we would see some kind of effect on something.

Within a few years, after his unprincipled, unsupported and unscientific attacks on climate «sceptics», my opinion had changed, to what it is now, that he's the very model of an unthinking and ill - informed little s ** t. Presenting «evidence» that you haven't checked out yourself is both irresponsible and unscientific, as is accepting «current thinking» or some form of consensus without questioning it in any way.

There is no persuasive evidence to support the contention that the companies were required to retain a portion of their current earnings during the material period, but, in view of the volatility of the companies» earnings, I do not think it would be appropriate to fix the husband's income on the basis that his share of every dollar earned by the companies is available to him.