Sentences with phrase «think on pace»

We had a winning car I think on pace; things just didn't go our way.

I get back a few pages of thoughts on pace, plot, characterization, dialogue, etc as well as margin notes, and I redraft.

Not exact matches

«There's no reason to think that the pace of economic growth today is excessive and needs to be slowed because of incipient inflation,» Josh Bivens, research director at the Economic Policy Institute, said in calling on the Fed not to hike.

We were originally thinking we'd bring this to the web, but in thinking about this, it was clear that a tablet — and the iPad rumors started to pick up pace — it was pretty clear that betting on a tablet, and form factor, would be the idea.

«Where we need innovation and where I think we are going to finally see social entrepreneurs spend more and more time is the public sector, because the big challenge that is facing every community on the planet is that government and public policy are not moving at the pace of technology or even meeting expectations of constituents,» says Blumenthal.

He thinks Apple will increase its dividend, but he'll be watching on Tuesday to see if the company says anything about the pace of those dividend increases.

Though it's anyone's guess how the data might influence the Fed's thinking about the pace of rate hikes, the contrasting views of policymakers suggest that now may be time for investors to model the impact of the three scenarios on their portfolios.

A new paper by Alessio Paces puts a new and potentially very helpful spin on hedge fund activism (I say potentially only because I'm still thinking through the implications):

«I think M&A is going to continue at a solid pace, but its impact on ABL demand does depend on which industries it is happening in,» reminds Philbrick.

More importantly, I think it would be improper to pace a cross at this site based on the fact that the attacks were religiously - motivated.

I think much of society is exasperated by fast - paced images and media, and would probably like to push pause on life.

He thought of Jesus who underwent scourging, carried his cross and walked more than a thousand paces, up to the summit of a high mountain, and so on.

Yet, on the other hand, neither have Mr. McGurn and Wall Street offered, or allowed, pace Milton Friedman, any creative ways or thinking to address the glaring and cruel gap in wealth between the few and the many throughout the world.

The laid - back pace of the exchanges — on topics ranging from «Thought for Your Thoughts» to the migration habits of squirrels — would be a great fit for an audio experience, not TV, though.

Just like going to a restaurant is a nice change of pace to get fed on a lazy day and get some food you wouldn't get at home... (2) I think we want to be a part of something bigger than ourselves, and meeting with other Christians on Sundays helps us with that — singing together, fellowshiping, etc. (3) Sunday mornings can be one of the places where the pastor gets to teach people how to feed themselves.

«Sometimes you have to analyse what's going on and to bring in your own philosophy at the pace where you think they can cope with it.

I know you've been skeptical of Pace (and rightly so in many instances) but I've liked Pace's decisions since the day he came on board (with a few exceptions) and always thought there was a bigger plan... but this year's FA class is a homerun that I think Pace believes in by the way his contracts are structured.

THIS IS THE LINEUP FOR ARSENAL HAD WENGER BEEN MORE TACTICAL IN THE SUMMER («AGAINST BIG OPPOSITION») WELBECK GIROUD SANCHEZ DIABY CAVARLHO RAMSEY GIBBS KOSCIELNY MERTESACKER CHAMBERS FABIANSKI i have been thinking about it for a long period of time and with the pace and strength in mid maybe we could have a decent shout at the title challenge but as we all know Wenger would hate this line up and put 4 CAMS for them, i think it is better we concentrate on drawing against big opposition.

His pace and runs are deadly and it really opens up space for the rest of our players and he is the only player to do that on our team plus I thought his dribbling and touch looked alot better today.

If Chubb gets past the Giants I think Pace is on the phone with Denver.

When you go somewhere, sometimes you have to analyse what is going on and to bring in your own philosophy at a pace where you think they can cope with it.»

And Wenger is talking about being bold, so I think he is going to hit them with pace on three fronts, with Campbell on the left.

I don't think you could single out Che over these clubs yet, I think Sol is just trying be different by taking a shot in the dark on the club which was almost the first to drop off pace.

I think so, he played well at palace but I just feel if we give it a right go with plenty of pace on the wings we could put 3 / 4/5 past that Liverpool defence.

Ramsey on the right means we play very narrow and I think his moments of good work has shadowed his faults out on the right, he has left the RB exposed multiple times and doesn't have the pace to get past players like a winger should.

They don't have lots of pace on the counter sp i think gibbs should play not that his good at crossing just makes himself available out wide.

Is there not a part of you that has been watching Wenger move from the reliance on Giroud to fill the Arsenal front line with pace and movement and get the best out of speedster Theo Walcott and Alexis Sanchez that thinks you may have been a bit hasty?

Cazorla is our best creative midfielder, Mert is important to assist with our young defenders development, both are not speedy customers, so no need to think of their lack of pace, they more rely on skill and positioning.

Lance Stroll even said that he thinks Force India is only on the same pace as Williams, and Williams isn't exactly looking great.

When we are playing the bigger boys, we have to be more cautious and sit back more than we usually do i think this line up is good as we can also attack them with pace and counter attack and we can even hold on to the ball more if we need to.

Great game, thought France showed Germany too much respect, by dropping off and allowing them to dominate the game, but when France attacked t showed u Germany defense and if Giroud had an ounce more pace he could have gotten himself on the score sheet twice, but contribute to the two goals indirectly and directly.

We need that pace on the front, I think we could have easily won against PSG if it was Iwobi — Alexis — Walcott

I really did think Campbell was going to be brought on to provide some pace up the left wing, and assist Giroud, both of which were desperately needed.

They played at a high pace, but even in the first half I think we were in trouble, mainly when we lost the ball on the counter-attack because they pressed well.

There were one or two games, (the one where we stuffed Man United with three comes to mind first), where I thought finally we are playing to our strengths, hitting the opposition on the counter with pace and clinical finishing.

barcelona are more geared to counter attack at pace this season and I don't think turan is quick enough to take a place on either wing but then again I could be wrong.

In the Monaco game we are going to need all the pace we can get at the back, it's going to be a risky game for us as we have to start well and we are going to go for it, this means we will be exposed at the back, that is where we need 2 quick central defenders, Kossy and Gabriel can look after themselves on the counter, but Mertesacker has no chance, so I think if we play Merte then we ain't got a chance at all, they will counter on us and due to him being slow.

I think similar might have happened with Monreal, he'll be listening to people say we need someone with more pace and is better attacking than he, sort of what we have on right wing, also his age.

I have always rated Iwobi but think we need to give him time and a lot of minutes and crucially we need to prevent him from becoming one dimensional i.e. over reliant on pace and cutting in from the left.

I think we took them a little bit by surprise and we played at a high pace from the start and closed down well early on.

I think its worth playing Giroud bcos vs barca we will need pace on the counter (not girouds strong point) and set pieces cud be key (Walcott isn't exactly a tank) Who has pace and strength up top for Arsenal??? Welbeck!!!! Plus he is in good form and high on confidence after Leicester.

I think the argument is more about the pace of change / catching up — I'd wager a hefty sum that AFC / AW have a slightly longer term plan than some of the guys on here.

I actually think he'd be a great holding midfielder — intelligent, reads the game well and has good positioning, strong, relatively big with decent pace, good stamina, good in the air, confident on the ball and able to go forward with it and hold off other players.

On form as a right winger, I think Walcott offers more goals and more assists than welbeck and the ox, not to mention that left backs are just pinned in when he plays as people are scared to death about his pace, he's the one player we have that is constantly playing on the shoulder of defenders, give him games and he will score goals, he's a better finisher than he gets credit foOn form as a right winger, I think Walcott offers more goals and more assists than welbeck and the ox, not to mention that left backs are just pinned in when he plays as people are scared to death about his pace, he's the one player we have that is constantly playing on the shoulder of defenders, give him games and he will score goals, he's a better finisher than he gets credit foon the shoulder of defenders, give him games and he will score goals, he's a better finisher than he gets credit for!

I do not believe it as he put the two lamppost OG and Per on the bench wary of the aerial threat they got and i do think this is why he was left out but pace is the best attack against Westbrom if anyone remember the game back at the emirates when they parked the bus.

The truth is Walcott is not Marc overmars on the wing how ever with his pace and lack of strength skill and power when shooting I think Walcott is best suited as a winger.

i was very impressed with coquelin but we could all see the way newcastle was fowling him im worried it only a matter of time before his injured so we need suffcient cover arteta is ok but if something happens to coquelin (i pray it doesn't) where his out for a couple of games arteta can not play a bunch of games for 90 mins all the time so im hoping arsene is looking at a DM has we speak also on theo, to be fair to him he actually did ok great movement but it brings me to think that giroud and walcott can play together in a 442 formation because giroud can provided the hold up play for walcott to make runs and walcott can make the runs to allow space for giroud if walcott has gioroud finishing and giroud walcott pace we properly would be with man city at the top of the league

I know a lot of people that think LB and RB aren't very different positions but you have to overcome muscle memory to turn your body in the different direction, and you can not attack in the same way you are used to as you have to cut into your stronger foot when on the opposite side, which means your pace, which lets be honest is Bellerins strength, is near useless.

Chelsea game having no width was something I noticed as well, I thought Ramsey made it too narrow and then too easy to defend, I was screaming at the TV wanting Wenger to put Theo on sooner as he would of kept more width and also punished the old Terry when theo cuts in with his pace.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits