Sentences with phrase «think only human»

We often think only humans can get food poisoning but dogs too can become affected by contaminated foods.
Originally, it was thought only humans... Continue reading →
Under the rules of the contest, AI is defined as «a computer that learns to perform intelligence tasks we usually think only humans can do.
More than that, the victory showed that a computer is now able to rely on its own intuition, something that was thought only humans could do.

Not exact matches

The only thing that I can think of is if humans being there is inherently part of the economy — and the only way that happens is tourism.
«Trailblazers in the private sector have inspired us to think of what is bigger than Earth... We are only a generation away from a permanent human residency on Mars.»
They only think about it not working because humans, in general, prefer to avoiddiscomfort more than they want to seek more pleasure.
Not only does this suggest modern humans might have been stepping tentatively into Europe and getting friendly with Neanderthals long before the wave of migration that led to today's population, it shows Neanderthals were more diverse than we thought.
So if you don't think we're past the great filter, and you don't think we're the first life forms with a shot at making it past the great filter, there's only one remaining conclusion: Humans are toast.
In 2017, I think we'll see a breakthrough in human - computer interaction and new form factors that have the potential to reshape not only wearables, but the entire mobile computing industry as we know it.
«I think the self - driving car has the opportunity to not only improve productivity for the people in the car, which will be a huge economic boost for those people; Not only has the opportunity to save lives — over a million people die worldwide in road deaths today caused by human drivers, and I think we can take that very close to zero, which is very good for both human welfare and for economic productivity — it's a very serious dent in productivity when people get killed; And then all the ancillary industries that end up getting built out.»
I think that our ability as human beings to doubt things and to reconsider everything that we see is not only in business, its in our life», Barber explained.
Think of the human heart: There is only so much exertion each one can take before it red - lines.
April 4, 2018 • Humans, it has long been thought, are the only animal to engage in economic activity.
His other professional acknowledgments include: Institute for Management Studies — Lifetime Achievement Award (one of only two ever awarded), American Management Association - 50 great thinkers and leaders who have influenced the field of management over the past 80 years, BusinessWeek — 50 great leaders in America, Wall Street Journal — top ten executive educators, Forbes — five most - respected executive coaches, Leadership Excellence — top five thinkers on leadership, Economic Times (India)-- top CEO coaches of America, Economist (UK)-- most credible executive advisors in the new era of business, National Academy of Human Resources — Fellow of the Academy (America's top HR award), World HRD Congress — 2011 global leader in HR thinking, Fast Company — America's preeminent executive coach, and Leader to Leader Institute — 2010 Leader of the Future Award.
As a yearly poll conducted by the Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada shows, only 39 % of Canadians think the human rights situation in China today is better than 10 years ago, down from 47 % in 2010.
With A.I.'s ability to learn human speech patterns (think of Siri or Google's Cortana), and adaptability to human wants and needs, as well as their living habits (think Alexa or the Google Home), Elon Musk is firm in his conviction that A.I. will only bring destruction.
Only humans struggle to think themselves unique, their tribe unique, their imagined stories unique and their gods unique.
After reading several of the posts on the «interpretation of mythical texts into a book called the bible» one is left to wonder how a being who is supposed to have created the universe would permit what is often referred to as «his inerrant words»... to get so screwed up... you would think he / she / it would have been keeping a close eye on a book that he / she / it wanted to have in print for... mass distribution... it is not not a womder the bible is messed up the way it is... it is a «human» construct... only humans could mess a book up that badly... gods do nor make mistakes... except for Rick Santorum
I would like to point out to those here who think it is not possible for Jesuits (or anyone) to hold science and faith simultaneously, and who invoke «evidence» as the only arbiter of what is real, that human knowledge is always evolving.
martinpaul i tend to think that religion only understands the human condition in terms of which god you believe in.
They are found to be a very Rich & Powerful Groups and Mother of Groups that control lives of Millions... Now Finding Peace means that we should think on how to get those Master Keys or Super Master Keys of Super Powerful Groups that are to be gathered all in one Ring lock that works to getting them to work towards One Purpose only and that is on how to make Human Life better Globally and that by investing in them human populations worldwide not minding their Race or Faith or Political interests such will work towards Building Bridges between all Nations holding and calling one Message of Love and Sharing in some form of Brotherhood that works towards a Greener Planet EaHuman Life better Globally and that by investing in them human populations worldwide not minding their Race or Faith or Political interests such will work towards Building Bridges between all Nations holding and calling one Message of Love and Sharing in some form of Brotherhood that works towards a Greener Planet Eahuman populations worldwide not minding their Race or Faith or Political interests such will work towards Building Bridges between all Nations holding and calling one Message of Love and Sharing in some form of Brotherhood that works towards a Greener Planet Earth!?
You clearly have no education and can't think, if you believe that the laws of logic prove that a human being is matter and only matter.
The ONLY reason humans think and know anything, is because they have heathy brain tissue and function.
Barbaric humans still eat dogs and the secular West thinks it's only funny.
To me the most ironic of all are the ones who think God wanted a human blood sacrifice, and the only possible way to get on God's good side is to acknowledge that.
If, as many seem to think, neo-Darwinism serves as a valid «design - defeating hypothesis» at the level of human reason but is rescued from any ultimately improper conclusions only by the intervention of theology, then it seems that my expansive definition is fully vindicated.
First, its premisses concerning society and modern man are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God was invented when the human race was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid of the religious and mythological notions that were appropriate when his thought processes were primitive; the affirmation that the modern world has been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance religious people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible is of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about modern man or present - day society.)
I never thought I could want life so badly for another human being... He always tried to leave and the only thing I knew was that I had to try to get him back.
The revelatory permission has been utilized only when the human record and human concepts failed to supply an adequate thought pattern.
Chalcedon was responding to people who thought that way and who said that Jesus» nature was not humanonly divine.
The oppressed have no other way of protesting their human right to live; and they think, too, that by rebelling they can change their situation for the better, if only to some small degree.
We think not only of objects as self - contained in particular regions of space and related to one another only externally, but we think of human selves that way, too.
Hi, I think it's only human to underrate the importance of anything we are unable to know or understand.
If mental health enjoys such esteem in Catholic thought and practice, it is only right that the Church looks with satisfaction at the new path being opened by psychiatry... all that Sacred Scripture says in praise of human wisdom is an implicit affirmation of the importance of mental health.
Some such fairies are present still in human thought: They disguise themselves and their more nihilistic threat by letting us see only the domestic and national fantasies.
We must understand that when a man considers violence the only resort left him, when he sees it, not as a remedy and the harbinger of a new day, but as at least an indictment of the old, unjust order, when he thinks of violence as a way of affirming his outraged human dignity (his pride!)
However, the continuity of structure and function from nonliving matter to living and from the simplest forms of life to the most complicated strongly suggests that even the most characteristic human activities such as thought and consciousness have an explanation, as yet only partly known, in chemical and physical phenomena.
Cartesians — taking the theologically grounded refusal to believe in spirits or worry about the influence of final causes to some sort of plausible limit — believed that «animals» were insentient, and that only humans had goals or thoughts or feelings.
Of course, we may be wrong to think that we truly remembered those long - lost almost - humans: Perhaps instead they were only speculative imaginings to explain old bones and arrowheads, fossils and mysterious cave paintings — just as our own stories about Neanderthals are also, mostly, fantasies.
His celebrated saying that existence precedes essence, once it is translated into classical terms, means only that non-being precedes the essences formally constructed by human thought.
In confining God's revelation to the written word, sola scriptura theology not only cut itself off from much of the rich trinitarian thinking since Nicaea, but limited revelation to the exigencies of human salvation.
i once suggested to a friend that satan was a human construct... not that that makes satan any less real, just different, any how it was just a thought... he only gets named as a character in the NT except in job.
Christians are only seeking «heavenly things» and think that earthly matters do not concern them and have no bearing on their salvation, because these things have become exclusively secular and human.
I think I can only respond to your succinct comments as: I can not always see what my fellow human being sees, but I can accept their belief, or none, and respond with love and respect to their human right to see and hear what they see and hear.
thinks, that the Tigris and the Euphrates have not a common source, that the Dead Sea had been in existence long before human beings came to live in Palestine, instead of originating in historical times, and so on... We are able to comprehend this as the naive conception of the men of old, but we can not regard belief in the literal truth of such accounts as an essential of religious conviction... And every one who perceives the peculiar poetic charm of these old legends must feel irritated by the barbarian — for there are pious barbarians — who thinks he is putting the true value upon these narratives only when he treats them as prose and history.
Now, when we see an illusion we know that there is a human - made solution and, while we may applaud the showmanship of the magician, we are never fooled into thinking that only one person has the power to do it.
Personic action, he thought, is essential in defining personhood since acts of will are the only vehicles through which the «purposes and designs» of the human spirit can be established.
DO N'T think you understand democracy if you think it's only about elections: it's about injecting as much of your religious culture and mindset which excludes freedom of thought, freedom of expression, political and religious pluralism, and human rights.
God will not only absorb the effects of the human misuse of power, but will «look bad» in the eyes of those who think that God's possibilities should not be so limited (see 1 Cor 1:26 - 31)(See Fretheim, The Suffering of God, 76).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z