Sentences with phrase «think other articles»

I think other articles mention that you should look for at least 77 %.

I think your other article about your older friend who invested for the dividend checks really hits home.

Not exact matches

When asked to select the articles they'd share, activity in the brain regions associated with assessing value, self - related thinking, and, crucially, considering other people's perspective showed a flurry of activity.

We share a lot of great content from other sites that we think will help our clients and readers — usually marketing tips or important news — as well as some team updates and positivity articles.

Besides writing under my own byline, I also run a ghostwriting business, where I help executives and other thought leaders publish books and articles.

After all, if people see that hundreds of others have shared, it's not going to take much for them to think that an article or product is worth looking at.

I would love to help you with your question and in fact, I think it would make a good article for others who are trying to start a business in the US.

I think I will read the other two articles on the Roth, but I am not sure if you touched upon the fact that one can also take up to $ 10K in gains for a first - time home (no tax penalty) and there is also no tax penalty for withdrawals so long as the account is 5 years old.

Think Quarterly includes articles by Google executives, profiles of managers at other companies, bright illustrations, data visualizations and large - font quotations that look like Google search results.

Although I did publish a few articles that I think deserve a mention, you can find the best link building articles of the year on other blogs.

What's so great about the book, and what makes it different from the countless other books and articles written about the «Oracle of Omaha,» is that it offers readers valuable insight into how Buffett actually thinks about investments.

Routinely task your team to compile their experiences and thoughts into blog posts, how - to articles, or other content.

The article goes on to describe other surprising figures in the survey and thoughts on why scaling back the program is a tough sell.

Hayek does not embrace free banking as an ideal, first - best system, because he thought it prone to over-issue (as I discussed in my 1999 article based on Hayek's other writings).

I think I saw that article too and I've heard of other SEO people that are doing good and getting natural links with just social media, outreach and no link building.

Executives of banks and other financial institutions of all sizes have grown to rely on International Banker magazine's cover stories and featured articles for inspiration as they seek to challenge themselves to take a fresh and objective look at their businesses, to «think outside of the box», to consider new ideas and angles.

Is it so wrong of me to have faith that only one person believes in the drivel that he's posting rather than think that another person a) actually thinks that chad is making good points and good enough points to post and b) go to the 62nd page of an almost defunct article for a conversation that has nothing to do with themselves other than to cheer on a stupid post?

I actually think the article is very affirming of early Christians because it points out that their love for others and the inclusive community they created was the it - factor that awed so many in the ancient world.

Whether one agrees with his politics or thinks he'd be a competent president is a different matter — but thank you for writing a great article on religion and avoiding the attacking, degrading and slandering of other writers» approach, which - while probably provoking interest and getting many reads - is simply disappointing and quite frankly hypocritical when it comes to religion.

David (Hayward) and others: what do you think of this article (http://www.ctsfw.edu/Document.Doc?)

The Declaration affirms: «Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship, and observance» (Article 18).

I think one thing that has been overlooked by most of the other comments is why the hell does a cleric of a religion that is supposed to not even have a hierarchy have $ 6000, which as the article pointed out is more than 6 times what the average Pakistani makes in a year, to throw around...

I would think Christians would be concerned about other Christians making them look bad instead of anti gay rants on an article about crazy preachers.

(The Allen article suggested, among other things, that Abraham was persuaded into thinking God wanted his son sacrificed because the Lord's orders came in a «resonant, well - modulated voice.»)

The article was about an Albert Einstein letter; it would be just as valuable if it contained his thoughts on other physicist's work on quantum physics, or his view on nuclear weapons, etc..

It is biased to all other ways of thinking except his and on top of that he chooses to name Christian leaders, without knowing the full truth about where they stand and he chooses those same ones for just about every article he writes.

I try to give credit for others thoughts or ideas whenever I know I am using them but I am sure, since I read a lot of others blogs, articles, and books some of what I think are my ideas have developed from a combination of my personal life experience and ideas or thoughts I have read or heard.

I think the point of this article is to acknowledge that «Christianese» is excluding to others of different faiths.

Obviously Jesus and the writers of Scripture treat some sins as more severe than others (see pp. 5 — 8 of this article), even though Eichenwald mocks anyone who thinks this as showing «that they know next to nothing about the New Testament.»

The scientists involved then asked some of their subjects to do things that might change their beliefs, like write a paper arguing for the other side» the article mentions capital punishment» and found that people tend to change their beliefs and at the same time change what they thought were God's beliefs.

i read the headlines and thought «great people are finally turning away from those fairy tales» only read the article and come to realize that they are just following other fairy tales no what a shame

When I'm out speaking to churches and other organizations, I can use your article as a prime example of all that's wrong and illiberal in liberal thinking and how unfair it is to those who don't agree with the totalizing claims of sexual liberation.

I read this article by charisma magazine which i thought was well written which is pro Women preaching http://www.charismamag.com/blogs/fire-in-my-bones/16851-why-i-defend-women-preachers This debate is an on going one John Piper who i respect as a bible preacher believes that scripture is clear women shouldnt have authority over men or teach in the church some go as far as saying women shouldnt preach in sunday school if the classes are mixed.Personally i think times are changing and i say that because i have a women manager she has authority over me and other men so if we follow the biblical example i shouldnt allow myself to be in that situation which is just crazy thinking.

I think this article was intended for Fox or one of the other overly religious media teams that caters to the less than appropriately educated.

Thus, as I have previously stated, this entire article exists for the sole purpose of trying to make people think one way or the other about this man without bothering to think about the issues which he DID speak of in his life, which IS ad hominem.

People just usually don't want to make waves over the other suspect articles of faith, because they fear they will lose the support of the group and that is a terrifying thought for many.

i'm not a particularily religious man yet, I read this article, I've kept informed of the new popes ideas and thoughts he has shared with others..

Many think that they are addressing books and articles to one particular community (normally their own), but these are in fact read by others, and especially by that other community that they are about.

i love this section of what you wrote because the other article on this site named» prosperity preachers of l.a.» i think they should read what you wrote along with the bible passage about «a camel can walk through the head of a needle easier than a rich man can make it into heaven»

The article is not worth a penny, I think CNN, just as most other media outlets would print anything with the word «sex» in it just to attract readers, On the substance, if you let any doctrine, Christian, or otherwise, dictate how you should make love, you build your own prison.

I would recommend Boyd's website for a good read about the correlation between Christianity and nudity / nudism as well as the naturist-christians.org site and experiencegrace.com — there is an excellent article called «The Bible, Society & Nudity» on it which I think others could benefit from reading.

I thought evangelicals were mostly pro-life and turn the other cheek and all that... I guess this article shows why the pro-lifers never protest in front of a gun shop.

In light of my previous post on Luther, and my opening post for this blog about being called a heretic, I thought I might comment on some recent articles and books which condemn me (and other speakers and writers) as someone who teaches a crossless gospel.

Not sure what subliminal «vibes» you're getting from the image, but I think it's just a stock photo that they've used before for other articles.

Share up to 3 fun articles or recipes that you think might help others on their real food journey.

But I have a loved one with diabetes to think about when I cook now, and I keep seeing articles from other bloggers about the tasty Vegan Parm they make and how much their families like it.

You can find it here, along with other articles from our Thought Leaders.

Admin DO NO ALLOW BOB OR SOME OTHER FOOL TO WRITE AN ARTICLE MAKING EXCUSES This is what we deserve No signings mean no progress, we've been in the CL 18 years and we / he has learnt nothing 61 % possession but we do not have a plan, it's like keep ball without a purpose I said it before and I will again, his time is up, and you can thumb me down as much as you want, if we end up in the shitty Europa cup it will affect our league position, AKB stop thinking we are quality, and who's laughing at CIty and UTD now

Reading the thread on this article and I noticed a lot of people naming strikers we could have gotten in past transfer windows that have gone to other club and failed, Balotelli, Falcao, Martinez, Boney etc are recurring names in all the comments, and am sat here thinking because they failed in thee clubs does not necessarily mean they would have failed if we had pulled out our fingers and hot them back then, Balotelli aside I strongly believe all of these players could have made a difference playing infront of our midfield and given the kind of attention and care Wenger gives Giroud and Walcott, adapting our play to suit them and giving them chances after chances even when its blatantly obvious they are average players so please lets not keep using that as an excuse for Wenger's ultra careful attitude in the transfer market, they could have failed with us, or they could have been massive for us, all speculations.

I didn't comment on the «Mourinho vs Wenger» title of this article, I responded to how some fans think they get to brandish others as «fake» because they share different views on our relative success the last 10 years.