Sentences with phrase «think people in a position»

You'd think a person in a position of that much authority would know better.

I think people in a position to choose should split the difference and get both, either using a policy with a rider or two separate policies.

Not exact matches

«I think that networks are in a tough position right now, where they have shows that a lot of people watch — much more than cable shows that are considered «hits» — but they're not allowed to call them hits because they're up against an old system.»

Also, by not making assumptions we put ourselves in a position where we are genuinely open to hearing what people have to say and not action under the delusion that we know what others are thinking.

If you are a smaller organization, make sure that you have multiple people representing your brand in thought leadership roles and externally - facing positions.

While many people, no doubt, have wished for a better dating app or thought about creating one, Bradford's position at Stanford put her in a spot to do something about it.

We typically think about people coming from business to occupy positions in the administration that have a particular oversight or much more direct daily interaction with the business community itself.

And I reckon, it's sort of interesting for me for private equity in terms of all we've seen, and what we have seen, where we have seen some misconduct and things like that,»cause I always think like, to my simple mind, that the people in private equity, they're the greatest, they're actually adding value to their clients, they're getting paid really really well, you know, if I was in that position, the one thing I would think to myself as I skipped to work was like just «Let's not mess it up.

In terms of the positioning assets for tax efficiency, I know you think about this as well, any rules of thumb for people?

The person I'm thinking of didn't have an open mind, they wouldn't listen, and they seemed obsessed with trying to convince everyone else of their position in a non-work related political subject.

Christine is not sinful by being gay and people who think that * should * have a stumbling block put in their way... and you are in a unique position to do that.

I think it is not discreminating against anyone to deny leadership in a group that has certain values if that person wanting a leadership position or becoming a member did not hold to those values.

Also, if you don't want to «fall for a scam» that's ok, Christ didn't go begging people to beleive in Him (guy who wanted to bury his dad, rich man, etc.), but I think (getting back to the article) that it's important if we are in the position of Chaplaincy then we should share the good news of Christ focusing on His love for us in that while we were yet sinners Christ died for us.

This position is usually referred to as just «theist `, since people who believe in gods, usually also think that their existence can be known.

Another fairly unusual position, as people who have faith in gods usually also think that their god can be known to be real.»

Personally, I think that the context includes not only where in Scripture the passages are from (including rhetorical function, narrative position, etc.) and the historical - cultural background, but also the context of the person using the quote.

Can I suggest something about power in it being about how power is used and as has been discussed before that it would be naiive to think that it is only people in positions of power tha abuse?

«In the election, Donald Trump also offered support for LGBT persons and rights, so I think it's too early to know exactly what their position will be and exactly what that means for the legislative landscape.»

or shares with others in dialog - thus opening their thoughts to scrutiny and thus they can be ana.lyzed and its value weighed... Typically, people in this position simply re-state their position as if their experience alone is «true.»

I had once thought that I could employ a bipolar scale in characterizing belief, one that assumed that the views of persons might be located at some position between orthodoxy (or conservatism) and modernism (or liberalism).

I think some uninformed people commenting here assume that all of Christianity agree with creationism and that our position is that it should be taught in the public schools and that is not correct.

1) most people haven't given serious thought to these issues and are just giving their «feeling»... it would not be hard for person with well - thought out positions (on either side of the issue) to expose the lack of logic in their position and get them to change their mind... most people just reflect their culture.

It is incumbent on those of us who are in position to influence the thinking of faithful people to make clear that the neo-liberal economic thought that informs most current top - down development, riding roughshod over communities, and reshaping the lives and thinking of hundreds of millions of people, is based on assumptions that are antithetical to ours.

To think that people have been in this position over most every religion conceived... should make us all disgusted.

There are instances where religious agencies have taken advantage of people in a vulnerable position, wrote Theos, a Christian think tank in the United Kingdom, earlier this year.

For some reason, we tend to think that the people in positions of power, the people with titles, and the people who get their voice heard are the ones that God has blessed in this world.

Judging before obtaining all facts invariably results in error, especially when malicious organizations and people are interested in having you embrace their position — just think of all the zealots killing each other.

Lots of Christians think that if they gain some sort of prominence in the public sphere, this means that they are responsible for using their position or their prominence as a platform to witness to other people.

Although I sympathize with the difficult position you are in, I think sometimes we all err on the side of being people pleasers.

It was all laid out some time ago by a republican think tank called the Project for A New American Centurywhich included many people who would hold high ranking position in the Bush Administration in a docu / ment ti / tled «Rebuilding America's Defenses»

I think our government is a good example that the people in the highest positions are not necessarily the most hard - working or competent.

A difficulty with the Hauerwasian position, however, is in locating this church that is to stand in countercultural challenge to the surrounding society when the great majority of people in the surrounding society think they belong to the church.

As Gentiles, you used to be in a position where another group of people looked down upon you, and scorned you, and judged you, and thought that God hated you.

It ridiculous that women, can have higher positions then men in the professional sense, but when it comes to sports some people, think that we should take a back seat and watch, Maybe you should brush up on you equality rights.

Honestly, I hope you think long and hard about your position on that because the only one in danger of losing eternal salvation is people who utter condemning, anti-Christian, anti-Jesus, anti-love messages like yours.

What a stupid idea to judge a person's position or argument based on how you THINK they felt in their own head.

Oh... forgot you Proving... I wasn't referring to what he said... on the surface, it's fine to have a point of view... whether I agree with it or not... but when you are A) in a position of influence and B) spending money to fight the opposing view... and it's to stop two people who love each other from wedding in the eyes of their Lord, then it is hate... if your ignorance allows you to think my comments are stupid... so be it... and one last point about slavery... whether it was Democrats or Republicans who supported, or fought against slavery... many justified slavery because of their perverted interpretation of the bible... most people can't tell a simple story from one person to the next... but so many foolish Christians think they know exactly what the bible is saying w / o any doubt... forget the fact that it's been translated and passed for 1000s of years... yup you must be right that God is against two people loving each other... He must have made a mistake with those folks huh?

People are where they are on these issues because of what they already think, and Francis is not in a position — in a one - week visit — to change people's minds about these tPeople are where they are on these issues because of what they already think, and Francis is not in a position — in a one - week visit — to change people's minds about these tpeople's minds about these things.

In either case, Paul is saying that Jewish people have traditionally thought that as God's elect, they existed in a privileged position before GoIn either case, Paul is saying that Jewish people have traditionally thought that as God's elect, they existed in a privileged position before Goin a privileged position before God.

There are times like this when people must think that someone like myself, or other people in my position, premeditate such things.

peppered with a great deal of regret and nostalgia.When I think of «the church» in the sense of a body of believers, for me, that is now a sense of uniiting with people that is no longer dependent on religious affliation.So, I can't really say, with serious convicton, «I love the church» That said, I strongly identify with reasons 1, 2, 7, 9, and 10 (well 10 from the audience / particpator position).

«It's a very uniquely positioned guest experience that I think many people in today's fast - paced life are craving,» U.S. CEO Doug Satzman says.

CB — Mertesacker, Koscielny, Gabriel (I think a lot of people forget that we bought him not too long ago), Chambers (can do a great job there when needed), and Debuchy (who can cover in that position nicely as well).

For anyone to think that they know better than Wenger (a person that sees these players in action, practically every day), in what position a player should be deployed in, is absolutely ludicrous.

Yes we should win, as long as we're not over confident, and Wenger doesn't play people in the wrong position and uses the subs properly, which I think was the problem with the West Ham game.

Now here's the thought, I'm sure at least 1 person in a good position has heard these players profess their love for us so why don't we task scouts to watch these individuals especially if the play in positions we need to fill or improve.

I think a lot of our previous problems were down to Wenger trying to shoe horn Chamberlain in, causing us to play people out of position, resulting in Liverpool having 12 men, while we had 10 largely not very happy players being played out of position.

If he can re-find those killer balls he used to have he can really add a lot... I really don't mind if people still think we should sell Wilshere... Wenger pretty emphatically turned any notion of the sale down when he said «we are no longer in a position where we have to sell our best players» which was a hands off warning as well as showing how highly he still rates him.

Besides several teams who have questions surrounding one or possibly two players, there is no squad that has so many issues heading into the final week of the transfer window... even Monaco, who have lost numerous players from their starting 11 have less controversy swirling in and around their club and they have champion's league play to contend with this season... just think of how ridiculous this situation is especially considering that we have had the same manager for over 20 years... no team should be better organized than ours... if nothing else, that should be the one advantage this team holds over all others, yet the exact opposite has occurred... this fact is even more disturbing considering the main argument against removing Wenger from his managerial position was that there was no suitable replacement and that people feared some sort of perceived drop - off if a new manager was brought into the mix... based on what we've witnessed since the time of his contract renewal a monkey with a magic eight ball could have done an adequate job... I hate to make jokes, in light of our current dilemma, but this team is so screwed up if I don't laugh about it, the only plausible response is to either cry or do something incredibly destructive... just look around this squad and try to see what our delusional manager sees that allow him to make such positive statements about our current team

I think next game Ramsey needs to play in Cazorlas position, Cazorla was poor in few games, he should be rested, Walcott should start instead of him, maybe even Ozil switch for Wilshere, Wilshere played very well, many people critisize him, but only OX and him has that ability to go through players and drive our team forward.