Sentences with phrase «think point number»

Dr. Curry, it a consensus, skeptics don't think point number 5.

I think point number 2 is the most important point of all.

I thought point number 5 in her «25 Struggles Only People Addicted To Diet Coke Will Understand» was particularly hilarious...

Not exact matches

As Northam cruised to his nine - point victory over Gillespie, I couldn't help but think that maybe it's time for newspapers to stop telling their dwindling number of subscribers how to vote.

«A lot of people are banking on it to make up for the first - quarter number, it needs to deliver... I really think that that number might be the trigger point on does this market have the legs to go higher.»

FiveThirtyEight pointed out that the number of people who thought tax cuts enacted under Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush would help the rich more than the middle class increased after those plans passed.

Some bitcoin data points seem easy enough to measure, but beware, there's more nuance to those numbers than you might think.

As Katz pointed out, «I honestly think that if Democrats broadly were told a year ago that this would be the extent of what Trump had referred to as «doing a number» on Dodd - Frank, they would probably take this deal.»

It's a big number and I think we have to take into context where that's going to put these markets from the starting point of unprecedented historic overvaluation.

I think the percentage of atheists versus believers is higher than the number you provide, and I also think the important point (perhaps implied by tallulah) is that per person, there is more anger on the side of the theists than the nonbelievers.

I think the point is you have to look at a number of studies that compile the data in different ways to see what is really going on.

I would have to say, taking into account the number of injuries you could have worked on personally and the likelyhood of them being Atheists and the likelyhood of you knowing this ahead of time that the person was an ACTUAL Atheist or God Hater (have not met one of them) I sort of think you are embellishing just a bit get your some point across that has little substance to begin with.

That said, I also think its obvious that there is something pathological about the shrill and feverish mentality of many pundits and commentators on the Right, many of whom I probably agree with on a number of substantive points.

And your numbers seem to be dwindling you say thousands are, then you say you know hundreds and now you say you know dozens, though I think you have sincere intentions please be careful my brother to stay in line with truth as you defend your point.

As Independent editor Simon Kelner pointed out: «Whatever Brand may be, he's not trivial... [he] definitely articulates a strain of thinking among a growing number of young people who feel disenfranchised, disenchanted, disengaged and, most important, disinterested in the idea that politics can change the world.»

The chief argument of this book up to this point represents the thinking of great numbers in the Western world and will presumably, therefore, be convincing to many readers who have given serious thought to the problem of the reconstruction of civilization in our time.

In complex religions, a great number of doctrines, religious practices and symbols are thought to point to the transcendent vision.

I am a Christian, and I think that the article raised a number of good points.

My point here is I don't think the usual listener who first encounters the Duke via one his «suites,» or through numbers like «Koko,» is going to quite catch the magic, the magic which the popular audience caught all through the 20s - 50s.

Having visited MacArthur's church a number of times; I had never really thought of him as a Calvinist, because he does not hold to all of the five points.

However, we think Wahlberg misses the mark on a number of points.

Writing about Humanae Vitae just a month after Pope Paul VI issued it, at which point lots of Catholics, including a goodly number of Jesuits, had popped a cork, the then - superior general asked his fellow Jesuits to assume an attitude of «obedience which is at once loving, firm, open, and truly creative» and «to do everything possible to penetrate, and to help others penetrate, into the thought which may not have been his own previously» - precisely because they were Jesuits, and this is what Jesuits do.

A point for Russell is the class of things which overlap, and he thinks this doesn't need an infinite number.

Considering the number of people who have been making negative comments regarding faith on this blog, I would have thought the point of my posting was blatantly obvious.

A final point relating to this flipped innovation, whereby the customer thought process is instilled into the packaging, is with the individually numbered plaques.

I think bergkamph has a point though, there have been a number of recent games where we have thrown away a good position.

A good number of Liverpool fans carried out their threat to stage a mass walkout during Saturday's game with strugglers Sunderland, and when they left in the 77th minute, two goals to the good, they likely thought they'd made their point and bagged three points in the process.

The other issue not really discussed is that if the premise is that KH got over on these other GMs then that would at least point to the fact that either our organization / system helped these players put up their numbers or that the broader view is these players (i.e. Smith) aren't as good as the Wings organization / leadership thought they were in the first place.

Here's how the Buckeyes are still running their base inside zone play, with a flair that allows them to keep a defense from keying numbers at the point of attack: This gives defensive backs a lot to think about after the snap, when they prefer to just flow to the ball.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

So, without looking at any concrete numbers, I do think the games tend to produce more points early in the season.»

This weekend could be a turning point is Wenger's approval ratings this season when we travel to face the struggling Manchester United of Jose Mourinho, but before we head to Old Trafford I think it is worth taking a look at the Premier League salary numbers printed by the Evening Standard today.

(all competitions) The numbers speak for themselves, and I do nt think one can blame the defence too much as martinez was our keeper at a point during that period and he did really well.

I reckon the Arsenal number one makes a good point and I even think he was a bit more negative about the away form than is necessary.

I selfishly want him to come back next year and hit 1,000 points, because even though the number is pretty arbitrary I think it matters to the Hall of Fame.

Lest you think only weird people on the internet care about stats like «points per attempt,» the Marshall coach has the exact numbers memorized.

Because to your point, I think if we just feed him 18 + mins a night he'll put up the counting stats, despite the fact that he always gets caved in, in terms of underlying numbers.

First of all I would like to say that I think Arsenal will come away from Vicarage Road next weekend with all three points, especially as the team should look a lot more like the Arsenal we are used to, with Olivier Giroud leading the attack and Mesut Ozil doing what he does best in the number 10 position, but there will be a lot more pressure on the players to beat Watford than is ideal.

A number of Premier League sides have registered an interest in all four at one point or another, and below is where we think they could move to if made available.

I think the ratings are fair, but I do take the point made about Alexis getting a slightly higher number, but I think they're fair enough already just like I said.

Olympiakos proved to be a disciplined unit that broke forward in numbers and Omar Elabdellaoui thought he was in at one point only for Samuel Umtiti to intervene.

A number of clubs in the Premier League and abroad have reportedly expressed an interest in signing him, with Liverpool thought to be the main contenders for his signature at this point, although Tottenham have been keen on him for some time.

He seems a bit scattered on the pitch and although there's no point writing off Fabianski at this stage (he's only 23 after all) but I think he's a good season or two away from claiming the number one spot.

But, of course, there are those that want to rain on our parade, one of a number of things that grated this weekend, so I thought I'd dive into each point and break them down.

I've had that happen any number of times, I made a claim about something I «knew,» someone challenged me, I looked for a source to back up my point and discovered I was actually wrong, or at least much less right than I thought.

I wasn't really thinking Folksy * expected * me to sell on his scale, I was really trying to highlight a point: this is a bit of a hollow feature for a huge number of handmade sellers.

I think it's a very important point to be made here: that we're seeing the consequences of very large numbers of blows to the head coming from, in our particular case, two contact practices a week, each lasting two to three hours, plus a game every week.

Now, honestly when I saw the first data point (homebirth leads to 2.1 per 1000 as opposed to.38), I figured people wouldn't understand how drastic that is because even thought it's a per - 1000 number, a jump from about.5 to about 2 isn't going to seem huge to some people.

If at any point you have thoughts of harming yourself or your baby, immediately seek help from your partner or loved ones in taking care of your baby and call 911 or your local emergency assistance number to get help.

An extra point to think about is the number of nursing bras you invest in.