Sentences with phrase «think society as a whole»

Just don't do so because you think society as a whole would be more accepting of a leaner or firmer version of you.

Not exact matches

Society as a whole is full of negative group - think.

Bignall stresses that Americans» perceptions of robots is altered by a cultural lens which depicts them as an existential threat — one that costs blue - collar workers their livelihood and down the line could endanger society as a whole (think the dystopian future in «Terminator»).

By reducing the potential for clone - like mindsets that traditional systems can incur, Trinkler hopes to enable future generations to not only think in unique ways, but also to build tools that are beneficial to the collective good of society as a whole.

This is funny since he only thinks there was a god because like most people that's what's been drummed into their heads by preachers and society as a whole....

Think of society as a whole without contraception and the overpopulation problem.

Elsewhere, I have indicated how this field - approach to Whiteheadian societies allows for a trinitarian understanding of God in which the three divine persons of traditional Christian doctrine by their dynamic interrelatedness from moment to moment constitute a structured field of activity for the whole of creation.6 Here I would only emphasize that thinking of Whiteheadian societies as aggregates of mini-entities with one entity providing the necessary unity for the entire group is reductively much more impersonal and materialistic than the approach sketched in these pages.

Then the absence of justice in the thinking of the now dominant ideology may be expected to have immense consequences for society as a whole.

Throughout his life, these essays on Judaism and the Jews provided Kristol with a forum both familiar and provocative enough for exploring his thoughts on religion, society, and human nature as a whole.

We habitually think of persons, one by one, as the constituent elements of society, and we regard the social whole as made up of their enforced or voluntary blending.

Griffin, it will be remembered, affirmed this same possibility for monarchically organized structured societies within a Whiteheadian perspective; according to his way of thinking, the regnant society within that structured society enables the society as a whole to possess that higher unity and exercise that more comprehensive agency.

While I do val - ue multi-culturalism, one of the problems that I think that @BG makes reference to is the «lack» of many sub-cultures within the U.S. to blend in and learn English, and contribute and be a part of the society as a whole.

Religious beliefs are corrosive to rational thought and a detrement to our society as a whole.

Funny I never thought of Jesus as having a hercules style body... Just average build... He did work as a capenter and the carpenters I know have good muscle tone... by are not body builder status, Hercules built to excess... They are just like a average farmer, strong and even in muscle tone... Jesus's whole life was about being humble and coming from the low end of the society... he was born with the animals in a very humble place... I do not see him as a super strong human... but then being the son of God, he would have had super powers if he wanted them... he just did not need them...

I think it is more and more a problem of our society as a whole that we have stopped to be truthful.

Preserving this household structure was thought to be critical to preserving society as a whole.

I tend to think that a fully consistent capitalism would recognize that those who benefit most directly from this training should bear the cost, rather than society as a whole.

I love to read the comments though that are wrong though, because it is a good commentary on what societies as a whole need to work on... wait... I think you're in Canada?

I do think rather than criticize the government for making mothers feel guilty for feeding with artificial milk, society as a whole must make major changes in thinking and policy, so that more mothers and babies can actually avoid the use of artificial milk in the first place.

I think the intention is to get people to think more about society as a whole.

When we think about, for example, what the state of unemployment is in the US or the extent to which the average American encounters crime, one relevant source of information is this perception of society as a whole: If one's impression is that America as a whole is doing badly, then one would infer that the situation for a specific issue would be rather negative as well.

We think of it as a negative emotion, but used in the right way anger can improve your health, job prospects, relationships — and whole societies

According to Dr Chatterji, also from the Department of Health Statistics and Information Systems at WHO, «Collectively, we need to look beyond the costs commonly associated with aging to think about the benefits that an older, healthier, happier, and more productive older population can bring to society as a whole.»

Do you think then that individuals and societies as a whole need to try to conserve energy?

It's hardly a slight against the existing product, as it's disappointingly fitting how angry one could become when thinking of another exciting opportunity lost to drugs, depression and society as a whole.

Creating the memorial... was a lot more meaningful than just reading words in a textbook, because we had to really think about the war's impact on society as a whole and how to display the emotions that came along with it.

The Inspired Teaching Residency is rooted in the belief that teachers, as Instigators of Thought ®, can be changemakers in their classrooms, schools, and society as a whole.

I think the greatest thing that could happen out of the whole situation is that people begin to read more, which would benefit authors everywhere and society as a whole.

Write about how you think these advertisements have affected you and society as a whole.

I think it's indicative of our society as a whole — that people perceive study abroad and international education as a thing for privilege and income, not as something that everyone should — needs to!

I hate to think of the horrible consequences that an economic catastrophe of these gigantic proportions that are being suggested could have on society as a whole.

I think this is also very much the case for our society as a whole.

Choice 1: How much money do we want to spend today on reducing carbon dioxide emission without having a reasonable idea of: a) how much climate will change under business as usual, b) what the impacts of those changes will be, c) the cost of those impacts, d) how much it will cost to significantly change the future, e) whether that cost will exceed the benefits of reducing climate change, f) whether we can trust the scientists charged with developing answers to these questions, who have abandoned the ethic of telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but, with all the doubts, caveats, ifs, ands and buts; and who instead seek lots of publicity by telling scary stories, making simplified dramatic statements and making little mention of their doubts, g) whether other countries will negate our efforts, h) the meaning of the word hubris, when we think we are wise enough to predict what society will need a half - century or more in the future?

I think for the global community to understand the climate change problems in a proper context, I think the new chair should play a very important role in identifying the climate issues, not necessarily only identifying the problems, but also the solutions and what opportunities the solutions may provide for the global society as a whole is very important.

The scientific community as a whole thinks they're doing a huge disservice to society, and that one day they will be recognized for who and what they are and the damage they are doing.

«I might say, parenthetically, I believe there are national security and common security aspects to the whole globalization challenge that I really don't have time to go into today, so I'll just steer off the text and say what I think briefly, which is that as we open borders and we increase the freedom of movement of people, information and ideas, this open society becomes more vulnerable to cross-national, multinational, organized forces of destruction: terrorists; weapons of mass destruction; the marriage of technology in these weapons, small - scale chemical and biological and maybe even nuclear weapons; narco traffickers and organized criminals, and increasingly, all these people sort of working together in lines that are quite blurred.

In reply to anon75214, who wrote «Engineers make a far greater impact on society as a whole,» I would urge you to think very carefully about society and how it functions.

It is not enough to add novelties, that is what innovation is, novelties without thought of their consequence on society as a whole can be devastating.

Some may say that teachers aren't as highly regarded as they once were, and I think we can all agree that a teachers should be much more handsomely rewarded for the service they provide to the community, and society as a whole.

«Without individuals thinking for themselves, society as a whole will struggle to distinguish the signal of truth from the correlated noise of conformity.