Sentences with phrase «think spiritual people»

I think spiritual people tend to have a different mindset and heartset, so they want to connect with a partner on that level.»

GOP As a spiritual Christian it is sad that you think spiritual people are cop outs.

Not exact matches

Though what you say, may stereotype some actual people in the «church» today, I think most people attend out of love for their God and spiritual nourishment.

While most people don't think about sustainable buildings in a spiritual light, the Benedictine Women of Madison, Wisconsin, believe they should.

Certainly if Christian people don't believe in ghosts, the boogyman or other's spirits, how can they claim the spiritual thought of heaven for themselves?

Pinewalker wrote: «I think most people attend out of love for their God and spiritual nourishment.

I therefore offer that such a «fast» (as you suggest) from all things spiritual may be unnecessary for all people... though I think that some may benefit from it.

I think spiritual leaders feel the obligation to ensure people are on the right «spiritual path» before moving to the next realm (whatever that might be based on personal beliefs or if there really is something beyond death).

Kimsland — you think people suffering, losing their jobs, their marriages, and in some cases their minds, and needing spiritual relief and meaning in the midst of it, is funny?

I think it is obvious that the social aspects of the church experience are what draws this unfortunate person — not the spiritual.

There is no hell... people make their own hell... God is Love and God loves all his children equally and would never condemn any of them to people's perception of hell... none of God's spiritual energy is ever lost and we are made from It... if you think otherwise, that is what you will find when you cross over, until you WAKE UP!

Even not being a spiritual person, I could not help myself but to think that God was in that room.

ABSOLUTELY NO historical evidence such a person existed, even and especially among contemporary spiritual writers who you'd think would have at least heard of the rabble - rousing Nazarene.

Michael «As a gay man I appreciate there efforts and support, but I think putting up this sign isn't really the best way to get through to people, all it does is create more hate, intolerance, and separation, I am not a christian but I am very spiritual, and putting up this sign implies that all gay people are atheists which is the furthest thing from the truth, I have no problem with religion, I have a problem with those who use there religions to control and hate others, same applies with atheism, if you don't want to believe in anything than fine, just don't push your non beliefs on me.»

Religion was utterly mute on these topics which is why we had the new testament for centuries and people still thought leprosy was due to spiritual uncleanliness.

As a gay man I appreciate there efforts and support, but I think putting up this sign isn't really the best way to get through to people, all it does is create more hate, intolerance, and separation, I am not a christian but I am very spiritual, and putting up this sign implies that all gay people are atheists which is the furthest thing from the truth, I have no problem with religion, I have a problem with those who use there religions to control and hate others, same applies with atheism, if you don't want to believe in anything than fine, just don't push your non beliefs on me.

When people read, comprehend, then apply Jesus» spiritual teachings to their lives they produce righteous decisions to their output of thinking / beliefs, writings and actions.

It is a true story, but this is the way some people think about demons and the spiritual realm.

I'm distrustful of people who always seem to be thinking of deep spiritual things, always striving and going - going - going: I think they must be horrible to live with.

When some people hear the words «spiritual disciplines», they sigh and think it all sounds too hard.

Sometimes, sure, I spun that flag around, hoping for people to notice me, to think that I was spiritual and holy, to think that I was beautiful and devoted.

And I think this whole legal / spiritual wife thing is such a good idea I want you to keep on being the theologian - in - residence at my church, and I'll help you convince other people that your legal wife is crazy so you should have a spiritual wife instead.»

Come on people I think we all know that God and Jesus are not liars, there is a spiritual battle here.

I don't think most spiritual leaders intend to control people so intensely, but they do.

The confusion on the Assembly floor in Vancouver reflected the fact that Christians have not been enabled to think theologically about the religious faith of their neighbors, as believing and praying (or meditating) people with a spiritual history and tradition of their own.

I think there is a lot of struggle going on because people want spiritual authenticity, and they want to keep the labels as well.

This course from the LICC is designed to stop people thinking that their spiritual or church life is more important than their day - to - day work.

Children taught all major religions are part of God's progressive revelation to mankind, but that each person should accept a religion not because it was the faith of their parents but because he or she independently searched, researched, reflected, studied, thought, meditated, etc, and came to their own spiritual belief.

The factors of chief importance in the development of this theology were: (a) the Old Testament — and Judaism --(b) the tradition of religious thought in the Hellenistic world, (c) the earliest Christian experience of Christ and conviction about his person, mission, and nature — this soon became the tradition of the faith or the «true doctrine» — and (d) the living, continuous, ongoing experience of Christ — only in theory to be distinguished from the preceding — in worship, in preaching, in teaching, in open proclamation and confession, as the manifestation of the present Spiritual Christ within his church.

It carried to fulfillment a long development of thought, disentangling persons from submergence in the social mass and giving to each one status, meaning, and rights of his own; it concentrated attention on the spiritual value of personality and its possibilities; it created a religion to be entered by free personal choice, regardless of race or nation; it set persons to building a social fellowship for the redemption of souls; and it proclaimed as the ultimate goal of divine creation and human hope the kingdom of God in «new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.»

I think a big thing about being spiritual is believing in something higher than yourself without being tied to some arbitrarily specific moral code created by people (not God (s)-RRB- in the context of their times that often has horrifyingly backwards and incredibly immoral rules.

I think that it is good that people are starting to see that you can be spiritual, but not religious.

Many pastors who try to control the thinking and behavior of others with the concept of «spiritual fatherhood» are more concerned with their own position of power and prominence than they are with the spiritual wellbeing of other people.

I understand «not going with an agenda» principally to mean not setting out to preach in peoples» faces, but I think it has a spiritual resonance that goes deeper.

You can be all close to God and spiritual when God is the only person to talk to, but I think it speaks more to your faith to walk everyday in the real world with your spirituality intact.

The short version is: I don't think the Exodus did happen in historical time, but that doesn't at all detract from its powerful spiritual truth, or from the ways we've constituted our community through telling this story in the first person plural, and through embracing the teaching that the Exodus didn't just happen then but unfolds even now.

I don't think what he does is harming anyone and if it helps some people lead a more spiritual life then so much the better.

People who read such articles think that if they are truly following Jesus, they need to be having spiritual conversations every day with pPeople who read such articles think that if they are truly following Jesus, they need to be having spiritual conversations every day with peoplepeople.

The same point is powerfully made by Kierkegaard in his Christian Discourses.4 The person who thinks himself a perennial loser needs the pastor's encouragement to be enabled to use those very circumstances of adversity for learning, spiritual growth, and discipline.

I think it is okay to be spiritual but not religious, and that people shouldn't have a problem with people who are like this.

I think if more people allowed themselves to be led by the Spirit, we might see the end to a great deal of the needs around as us God's children pour out their resources in love and compassion for those who have spiritual, physical and emotional needs.

When I read of people protecting (saving) persons who believed differently than themselves, then I think we should check out what is going on in the spiritual lives of such saints.

Who that person is and what he or she may think about religion are thus weighty questions, not just for science and the academy, but also for communities of belief, and indeed, the entire moral and spiritual fabric of our culture.

and i agree with your thoughts on a name change, to me, not having any past experience with the term «elder», good or bad, it impies to me spiritual maturity and experience, and the people in our church that i would go to in time of crisis model that spiritual maturity and experience whether or not they are on the team.

Yet when most people are reading their Bibles (and they have their spiritual - colored glasses on), and read about some sort of sin that brings death, they put a spiritual twist on it, and think it is referring to spiritual death, or losing your eternal life, or something like that.

Yes, some people pray incoherently out of habit or because they are not being thoughtful, but sometimes the prayers you criticise result from spiritual emotion and depth of experience of God - especially (I think) speaking in tongues.

Not sure i am convinced because how do you explain the verse an eye for an eye in the old testament there have always been consequences for wrong doing and stiill are for sin.If we believe the word then that word is from God not satan.As far as satan is concerned he uses violence as his tools of trade he works on our fears and is limited to robbing stealing and destroying he does nt have anything else.Violence confirms to us that there is a spiritual battle going on both on the earthly plane and in the heavenlys and the battle is over souls.The verse the kingdon of heaven is expanding and violent people take it by force is referring to that spiritual battle and as satan uses violence to expand his dominion so does God use violence to counter him.So what does he mean by that term for me i think it is saying that the the force of evil that satan uses or violence is overcome by a greater violence or force a more powerful one that being the Love of Christ.Through the cross we see that clearly portrayed and in our lives that very same battle is still happening right now for dominion be clear if we walk in the flkesh satan will have dominion over us but if we walk according to the spirit and abide in Christ we have freedom from our old nature.and satan.He can oppose us but he wont be able to influence us if we are in Christ.

But I think there's another side to what a lot of people really mean when they say, «I'm spiritual but not religious.»

Imagine a person we depend on to run our country thinking there is actually a spiritual man god that supposedly lives in the heavens and is watching over our every move.

I sometimes think that we diagnose someone as «demon possessed» because we don't want to deal with the psychological, emotional, mental, or spiritual issues that the person in question is actually dealing with.