So evolving intelligence seems likely, given a propitious habitat — and astronomers
think such habitats are common.
Not exact matches
They
thought Methanococcus jannaschii and other archaea — microbes with similarly exotic
habitats and tastes,
such as a love of sulfur or salt — were just quirky bacteria.
Even several species
such as the red shiner and sand shiner, which were
thought to be plentiful, are declining as a result of reduced stream
habitat, according to Perkin, who was the lead researcher for the study and is now an assistant professor at Texas A&M University.
Professor Poinar continues, «Mammoths were much better at adapting to new
habitats than we first
thought — we suspect that subgroups of mammoths evolved to deal with local conditions, but maintained genetic continuity by encountering and potentially interbreeding with each other where their two different
habitats met,
such as at the edge of glaciers and ice sheets.»
Students can also record speculative information,
such as how old they
think the object is or what it's original
habitat might be.
Other issues include straddling stocks (relevant in the Belize / Honduras / Guatemala area), harvesting of marine resources
such as sea slugs / cucumbers (which was certainly never
thought of 1948), protection of mangroves, seagrass and other marine
habitat, etc..
When did the first man or woman
think about buttressing
such a
habitat using tree limbs?
The bad news may be even worse: the species depends critically on highly saline large lakes (Mono Lake, Great Salt Lake, etc.) for its mid-summer molt, and
such habitats are widely
thought to be already deteriorating because of climate change.