Based on all the data on the depths of the nation's education crisis — including the fact that three out of every 10 fourth - graders are functionally illiterate as well as how traditional policies and practices keep laggard teachers in classrooms — you would
think valid criticism, internal and external, would be welcomed.
Not exact matches
A
valid criticism made by Chinese businesses of their Western counterparts is that they sometimes appear hard - wired into
thinking that everything they do is automatically superior to the local competition.
Though Mariz recognizes a great diversity among Pentecostal denominations, and admits that some of the
criticisms are
valid, she
thinks that even neo-Pentecostals and autonomous Pentecostal groups often provide the poor with experiences and values that help them confront their daily problems and survive in a hostile neo-capitalist environment.
So while it is a
valid criticism for new Christians to say that they «are not getting fed» by the church, it is not
valid for those Christians who
think they are mature to make the same complaint.
I
think your
criticisms are
valid in the bigger picture, but I didn't necessarily
think they were
valid yesterday alone.
but even if your
criticism of Ramsey's consistency was
valid, what makes you
think that's an area of his game that's incapable of improvement??
If you want to go beyond that and consider whether or not the
criticism was
valid in an ethical or moral sense, I
think you should consider that this woman made a public demonstration designed to draw attention and then posted a photo of it on the internet along with her own opinions about formula being poison (clearly a
criticism of anyone who feeds it to her baby).
But amid the
valid criticism, there are language tropes and modes of
thinking that many slip into without interrogation.
For example, I
think Stuart's
criticism is a more
valid one of a system where the party has to hold a primary ballot, and where anybody at all can put in as a candidate, and anybody can choose to vote in it.
@user4012 I appreciate the sentiment, SJuan I
think pointed out a pretty
valid criticism (people actually do get punished before trial), and I haven't quite figured out if or how I should address that for this question.
But in THE TREE OF LIFE, I found that the non-linear approach detracted from the strongest parts of the movie, so I do
think in this case that it's a
valid criticism.
Do you
think these
criticisms are
valid?
An essay can contain various elements such as literary
criticism,
valid arguments, political manifestos, daily observations, remembrances and even reflective
thoughts.
However, as I had told Doug originally, I
think his
criticism of the OxCal and Calib calibration methods is actually
valid: I just
think that imperfect understanding rather than misconduct on the part of Bronk Ramsey (and of other radiocarbon calibration experts) is involved.
Anyway, I can not see anything in what you have said that makes me
think there is a
valid criticism of the distribution used.
So a) what I
think is a
valid criticism may or may not be in fact
valid, but b) I do have a little less personal investment in all this.]
I
think the core of your argument as I see it (the need for scientists to be less defensive, less circling of the wagons, more introspection, more communication and collaboration with «outsiders», taking
criticism seriously, etc) is important and
valid.
His
criticisms are
valid; I just don't
think they mean you shouldn't use Dropbox.
Can you tell me what the downsides or
criticism are that some have that you
think might be
valid for some people?