I will begin writing today about «Baptism today» and why
I think water baptism is a good practice in some situations, but there might be better alternatives in other situations.
Not exact matches
Like I
think The
Baptism of the HS showed they got to be
water baptized.
Unfortunately, I
think Rachel's plea to pastors to tell the truth is a naive gesture, one that assumes that Christians find their sense of community in the
waters of
baptism rather than their shared ideas.
Second, while some
think that Peter is referring to believer's
baptism because of the mention of
water in 3:20, Peter clarifies in 3:21 that he is not talking about the outward washing of the flesh with
water but the inner purification of a good conscience toward God, which is accomplished only through the Spirit.
I
think there can be great value in
water baptism, the physicality serves as a mental tatoo.
It was
thought that the significance of
baptism was not in the symbol of going under the
water and then rising back up as though from the dead, but in the power of the
water itself after it had been blessed by a priest.
You have been indoctrinated with the false teaching of
water baptism for salvation so that every time you see the words
water or
baptism you
think it has to do with
water baptism for salvation.
I'll probably
think too much about how I love to give birth in
water, how
baptism and
water pull me into relief like nothing else.
Jeremy, I get what you are saying but i don't
think for a moment that those requesting
baptism from the church can't differentiate between the
water ceremonies of the Hindu, Jews or Muslims.
I
think scripture is pretty clear on the idea that
baptism is not about
water, but being identified in Christ.
Remember, whenever we see the word «
baptism» in Scripture, we must not immediately
think about dunking somebody under
water, but must first remember what the word means, namely, «to be immersed, overcome, or fully identified with» something or somebody else.
It is for these reasons that I
think that the growing and cutting of hair might be one good modern alternative to
water baptism for the new believer.
If we
think of
baptism only as getting dunked under
water, Paul's statement is difficult to understand.
I
think it is like holding a person under
water in
baptism long enough to get the fear of God into them, except they can hear preaching including audio of a whole Gospel.
Very few people realize this, and many churches and denominations
think there is only one —
baptism by
water.
If you
think Jesus is a good man, a good teacher, or even the son of God, but you deny that He is the only eternal Life Giver, the only Messiah Savior who gives you EVERLASTING Life, you are L O S T. Millions of professing Christians are LOST because they
think its Jesus plus good works,
water baptism, and / or other beliefs.