Sentences with phrase «thinking about client service»

Think about client service as well as technical results to ensure the best chance of getting an interview.

Not exact matches

Once the clients and services are outlined, consider whether your firm has the appropriate infrastructure — including compliance, staffing, workflows and technology integration — and think about creating a go - to - market strategy, including branding and messaging.

Think about what makes your client's product or service unique.

For a b2b client who wants to rank for their service I would think they don't need to worry about a social share button?

Clients thought about by Japanese Financial Services Agency uncover that the nation's aggregated crypto - exchanging -LSB-...]

The key is for services to think about fathers support needs and how they might work more effectively with this client group — and help is at hand.

Laura's work has been found on Thought Catalog, Female First and Digital Romance, among others and her past clients rave about her compassionate coaching services.

If you price a book at 99 cents, what do you think your clients are going to think not only about the book but potentially about your services?

You can check out StudentsAssignmentHelp reviews to know more about what our clients and students think about our expert writing services you can also check our free Essay Writing samples and assignment writing help example to measure the quality of our professional assignment helpers.

We do think they could be a little clearer about the five - day period clients have to cancel without penalty, as well as the one - time work fee that is charged after work begins and is separate from the monthly service fee.

When they are paid by the financial services industry and not by their clients, think about the continuing dilemma that even an ethical person faces.

Advances in technology, new ways of thinking about client compliance, and a structured approach to packaging separation anxiety services have made what once seemed nearly impossible - successful resolution of even severe separation anxiety cases - quite doable.

Advances in technology, new ways of thinking about client compliance and a structured approach to packaging separation anxiety services have made it possible to help even the most severe separation anxiety cases.

And I think about the clients that really depend on us to help their pets - they truly appreciate our services and would be lost without us.

After working for another in - home care provider, she thought about expanding hospice services and convenience for clients.

Great insights into how clients think about legal services and how law firms should respond.

It may be that the «skepticism» trait, so highly scored amongst lawyers, is exactly the approach needed; to take a step back and think critically about the automation that's coming and how we can use machines to do things that deepen and strengthen the services we provide to clients.

Drilling into the information asymmetry piece, it might be helpful to think about what a «lemon» is for different types of personal legal services, and for different clients.

I've seen letters written to unhappy clients accusing them of «nit - picking», or using phrases like «the complaints about the reception staff are ridiculous» or «I think you should be more than grateful for the service that this firm has provided».

Look, globalization information technology and what I often call the kind of blurring together of traditional categories like law versus business, or global versus local, or public versus private, these three things are reshaping everything about our world and as lawyers of course we should think they're going to reframe us about what it means to be a lawyer, the market for legal services, how we connect with our clients, the kinds of things that we do and how we do them.

So I think not to embrace it is a missed opportunity, and I think also dangerous, because I think a lot of the change that comes with modernization of professional services is going to happen, it's going to be fueled by IT, but it's going to be driven by the clients, and I think therefore it's a missed opportunity if the US lawyers don't think about how they can maximize that sort of opportunity and sort of get with the program of change really.

«I think this process gives the client a degree of control that lawyers don't normally give clients,» Joel Miller is quoted as saying about unbundled legal services.

But lawyers who want to gain a competitive advantage and create tighter bonds with clients should think hard about how they can use the Web to deliver their expertise and service directly to clients over the Web.

As cost pressures from clients intensify, as new service providers emerge, and as new technologies are deployed, it is unwise for any firm to avoid thinking about how it should work differently.

Sam: Do you find, because this always comes up when we start talking about law as a business, do you feel like there is a trade off between thinking of your firm as a business and the quality of service that you give to your clients?

I think for that reason lots of firms are thinking about what's the best way that we can provide this service to our clients and ensure we are advising them and offering them the best options possible for navigating what has become a more complex, involved and risky proposition because the courts have really set high expectations for how these processes will be managed and for the consequences that can flow from doing it improperly.»

The satisfaction score dropped to 4.1 out of 5 from 4.3 in 2017, highlighting the need for law firms to think much harder and smarter about how they can better service their clients.

Some firms are genuinely investing and starting to «think» differently about the way they deliver their services and interact with their clients.

I hope that lawyers who are listening are starting to think about ways that they can bring that fifth of the country who is disabled in and help them find legal services and make them clients.

Sam Glover: I guess, I'm curious about what both of you think about this, but there's been a lot of talk about the movement at big firms and I think smaller firms are starting to try to do this too, where you do build the firm up as a brand that guarantees a kind of service and a level of service and institutional knowledge and technology competency, to try and encourage companies and clients of all kinds to hire the firm, not the lawyer and so that the firm can say to the lawyer, «Go ahead and leave.

Nevertheless, with the ongoing war for talent and the legal technology race heating up globally, it is more likely than not that law firms in the South East Asian region will soon be challenged to think about how their law firms — the centre of legal services — will be designed for the 21st century client.

She will be a huge asset in servicing clients that are thinking about expansion there.»

Second, there are many aspects of our service for a client that are not billed for, such as the time thinking about the case.

When tempted to talk about features, think about why those features of your service are helpful to the client.

I guess maybe what I'm thinking is that by opening up the window, by learning how to code, learning what's possible, it lets you see a different way of serving clients and solving legal problems, and part of me thinks that, as new possibilities come online, new ways of serving clients by building tools that fix things, like this parking ticket app, like a service that allows lawyers to build a referral network that makes them look more like a giant, spread out firm, and other things, as these possibilities come out there, you can stop thinking about serving just one client's legal needs, and start thinking about solving that legal problem for anyone who comes to you.

The Legal Education and Admissions Section is being asked to think about law school, at least in part, in terms of producing lawyers with knowledge, skills and values geared towards the practical demands of a professional life of client service.

One of the things that's really cool about today's conversation with Brad is looking at a very parallel industry in the financial advisor financial planning world, and how they think about building businesses, and marketing, and client acquisition, and client service in ways that I think is going to sound totally foreign to lawyers.

Too many law firms and solicitors take their clients for granted or pay lip service to client feedback - they don't take the time to understand what their clients really think about them.

The LAPG has today written to the Legal Services Commission urging the LSC to think again about imposing the new legal aid contract on the legal professsion in order to prevent significant harm to the interests of clients.

It has allowed us to think about how we work in a different way, to provide better service to our clients, and simply to serve more clients.

A post-matter client survey is one of the best ways to collect information about what clients thought about the services you provided to them.

My SLAW post last week was about the importance of keeping your clients happy, and how a post matter client survey (a sample survey is here) is one of the best ways to collect information about what clients thought about the services you provided.

It's not about what you think or need in whatever legal service you want clients to engage with you, it's about what your client needs and wants.

The goal of the program, which was also followed up on in other programming throughout the semester, was to help students think about and pursue the skills and behaviors — such as adaptability and resilience — that they will need to effectively service clients in an ever - evolving world.

In order to improve your legal sales process, it helps to think about the legal services purchasing process from a client's perspective

What it means is you should be thinking about how China's reach impacts your clients and how that will impact their need for legal services.

Meanwhile, many big firms have managing partners who think more holistically about how the delivery of legal services needs to be transformed to meet the changing needs of their clients.

Plus, clients benefit because, if they are prepaying for services, they will more than likely to use them (as opposed to thinking twice about an hourly charge and risking it).

You probably have a database with old clients, think about which ones were the happiest with your service.

Many lawyers and teams I've worked with, once they start thinking about a single bottleneck theory, are often able to identify their high - level bottleneck (e.g. not enough sales leads, not enough closed deals, or not enough time in the day to service all of your client demand).