«We didn't wake up in a cold sweat
thinking about labels,» quips Max Winograd when asked how he and two Brown University classmates, Ben Lux and Mike Woods, decided to start NuLabel.
Not exact matches
The environmental impact is potentially huge: Just
think about all of those FedEx, UPS, and Amazon packages that require
labeling.
Think about independent record
labels such as Merge and Matador, which has thrived financially by working closely with artists and keeping up communication with fans.
When most investors
think about different style boxes, whether it's large cap growth stocks or small cap value stocks, they probably just take the
label at face value.
Agency loans are SunTrust's
label for the Fannie Mae HomeReady ® and Home Possible ® programs, which both allow higher loan - to - value ratios that allow people with less in savings to
think about applying for a home loan.
According to Bain, while Chinese shoppers consider famous
labels, they don't necessarily
think about any single brand when they make a purchase — leaving plenty of room for brand owners, both foreign and domestic, to cultivate stronger ties through effective marketing.
I am not defined by such
labels as atheist or believer, they are just possible words to describe some very miniscule part of what I happen to
think about a very basic level of the topic.
I'm speaking
about my own faith only: To become a Christian, it must be your own choice.No else can decide this life style for you.I know many in the past and present have
thought raising a child under the Christian
label will save them for hell but in actual reality, the choice is their own not their parents etc.This life (being Christian) goes deeper than just believing.You have to consider this yourself.Many today do not even consider Christ as their savior because they just believe what their church or family says.
You're obviously not an ultra-orthodox Jew so why should anyone care what you
think needs to be
labeled kosher or not seeing as you don't know the first thing
about kashruth.
[Steve, I
think David is very comfortable with those
labels too — he is beyond caring
about labels, I
think.
Those who questioned too deeply or sometimes at all (just
THINK about raising your hand during a sermon) were frequently
labeled as doubters, which would mean auto - hell upon death.
I hate
labels David and I
think you know this
about me.
If you wear your
label too proudly, when you come across a new idea you might ask «what do we
think about that?»
I
think given equal opportunities there will be a natural inclination for many towards traditional roles and that this is healthy, has nothing to do with any artificial social construct but is natural and comes out of biology and now might be the time to be having open discussions
about this kind of thing without having to face the fear of being
labelled misogynistic for doing so or with feeling fearful of any threat to equality.
Indeed, he particularly fears coming out
about his attractions while struggling against them, which would get him
labeled a repressed homosexual, the gay - basher who himself is queer, the gay kid who
thinks it's just some disorder.
It always amazes me how many people will get so worked up
about any «non-believer», which is what I tend to
label myself as, simply saying that he «
thinks that God and the Devil aren't real.»
I
thought about how I was giving up what I
labeled as «quick fixes,» meaning anything that I turned to instead of Jesus which ranged from numbing myself with Netflix binges to eating a pint of Ben & Jerry's after a bad day.
I
thought carefully
about using «Messianic Jew» as a descriptor for this series, but ultimately, if I had to assign one
label that captures who I am, it's that.
Considering our recent conversation
about the future of evangelicalism and my generations» discomfort with that
label, I
thought you'd be interested in his remarks.
While it used to serve Americans well to carry the
label «Christian» in most circumstances (
think about running for public office, for instance), it can actually be polarizing or considered intolerant now.
For me this phrase just means that we should value, respect, cherish and love each human inherently because they are fellow human beings regardless of any
labels we wish to put on them and that it is helpful and constructive to distinguish people's «mark - missing» behaviour from their inherent value as a human being i.e. «I
think what Donald Trump said
about banning all Muslims from the United States of America is stupid» and NOT «Donald Trump is stupid».
It really makes me
think about areas in my life that I've buried and
labeled «impossible».
I
think this case she said something without
thinking based on pre-existing bias
about the
label «atheist» and demonstrated honesty (at least in terms of how she views the term) more than many of the things she says to be inclusive.
I like to
think more
about the goodness and nutrients those foods are giving me, rather than the
label x x x x x Just some friendly advice x x x x
ach,
labels... one of the core problems in our world, when you
think about it.
Obviously everyone needs to make their own decisions
about how they eat and why, but I don't
think it could hurt for people to be a bit more knowledgeable
about what these
labels actually mean and respect the people choosing / having to eat by them.
If we worried less
about buying into
labels I
think we would not only be healthier and happier but we would have more love and understanding for others.
I also
labeled a few bags and set them just outside of the trash area at the apartment complex (I went back and forth
about this, but in the end I would see the same few homeless people going through and picking out bottles / cans every morning and I
thought maybe they would appreciate a few boxes of [good] snacks and if not it was right there and could go out with the trash.
This was long before anybody was
thinking about clean
labels.
Although not as comprehensive as Chile's
labelling laws (which include calories, something Canada might want to consider given the new calorie availability study), Canada is poised to become the second high - income country to graphically warn its citizens
about foods they should
think twice
about before consuming.
Unless that one time I saw someone
label a post
about mixing peanut flour with water «recipe» I don't
think a dish needs to be super involved.
Although most of the issue in the market falls to the retailer's side, Hiebert said manufacturers could
think about publishing recipes, showcasing pairing ideas on
labels and creating a digital space where consumers can learn
about farmers and information
about the cheese.
So would you
think about stocking an own
label equivalent?
Though I
thinks it's fair to
label the recipe as vegan I can see why you as a vegan wouldn't want to read
about chicken in the write up.
You should
think about using a contract packer, someone who would cook, bottle, and
label your product from your recipe.
I
think the fact that you're paying more attention to
labels, portion control and just that you're
thinking about the things you put in your body is a huge success!
Since I don't always have time, or
think about making it homemade, I often scour the aisles and read the
labels.
Since you brought it up, I don't
think training credentials matter when talking
about MMA judging, nor do I ever
label myself as a fighter or a martial artist.
I recognise everyone has a different idea
about player
labels / roles / position etc but many seem to
think «centre forward» and «striker» or «forward» are mutually exchangeable terms.
I try not to
think too much
about these
labels and concentrate solely on my performance on the pitch.»
So before we ever see federal funding levels adequate to finance «real food,» «clean
label» meals like those in this Minnesota district, it's going to take a truly seismic shift in how our nation
thinks generally
about food and the feeding of its school children.
I am all
about going on adventures and not having to specifically stay in properties
labeling themselves as family - friendly, but if you need a break and don't want to have to even
think about high chairs or change tables or stroller access, Disney's hotels and cruises have you covered.
I certainly agree with what you have written here and, oddly enough, I
think that the blog article I wrote last night (and will post today when I get the right picture to go with it)
about «
labels» falls into the same «where we got off track» framework.
A child who has been
labeled as a «little scientist,» may not pursue his interest in music because he
thinks he's only supposed to be passionate
about science - related activities.
Think twice
about giving your children foods with
labels listing food additives, colors, preservatives, or chemical names you can't pronounce.
When we accurately
label emotions and
thoughts — sharing our insights
about how our children feel, as well as how others feel — kids tend to develop more secure relationships and stronger social skills.
I personally
think this is effective but you will need to check your manufacturer's care
label if you are concerned
about warranties.
Encourage him to draw pictures of people, places and things he likes to
think about, and then
label the pictures.
I've
thought about it and have decided that I never, ever want this stuff in anything I, or my family, or my friends consume unless they have made an informed choice to go ahead and it it based on clear product
labeling.
While the Huffington Post had no qualms
about labeling the Lankao home illegal, a closer look at China's local culture suggests that the black / white, legal / illegal dichotomy which presupposes so much of our (Western)
thinking about society, is not apposite in the Chinese context.