As I too watched with outrage the footage of police spraying unarmed, peaceful protesters this weekend, and the incredibly powerful silent walk of shame endured by UC Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi, I got to
thinking about this movement's agenda.
Here's
his thinking about this movement.
The second workshop took place at the South London Gallery, not only were the group
thinking about movement and the camera, they now had to consider the artwork and the general public too.
From them, we've been trying to extract a new way of
thinking about the movement of light.
It opened up a whole new way of
thinking about movement.
«As in the environment above the sea, we tend to
think about movement in a horizontal dimension, across the breadth of the oceans, but at sea there are perhaps even greater habitat boundaries and gradients as species move vertically with depth.
Eventually, they were able to move the robotic arm to reach and grasp objects in random locations on a table and move objects from the table to a three - layer shelf by only
thinking about these movements.
When humans move, or
think about a movement, neurons in the motor cortex produce tiny electric currents.
And, when you drive to work, you're likely not actively
thinking about your movements.
It gave us not only something we didn't have when Frankfurt opened — a collection of forward - thinking essays — but also because it pulls together some important
thoughts about a movement the day - to - day commercial side of publishing doesn't have many chances to see yet.
It may be that the passage of time has given us a clearer way to see and
think about the movement, and Carone, one of Abstract Expressionism's classicists, provides us with textbook examples.
Not exact matches
Even those who
think the
movement misguided should in principle be happy
about its idealism.
«I tell people not to
think about it for others, but
think about it for themselves,» Enno Schmidt, economist and leader of the basic - income
movement, told the Times.
Because I truly
think this is a
movement... I truly don't believe it was
about me in particular.
The book is particularly helpful, says Branson, because the authors explain how to build and successfully channel new power: «It's a useful lens to use when
thinking about how business has changed, how to spread ideas or start a
movement, or create change.»
«I started going back and trying to
think about what I use in my day - to - day work,» said Peter Gleick, a hydrologist who looks at the
movement of water all over the world to understand and predict droughts and flooding.
I can't help but
think about the current
movement of employers to assign open «offices» to employees when I read this quote from Cleese.
[01:10] Introduction [02:45] James welcomes Tony to the podcast [03:35] Tony's leap year birthday [04:15] Unshakeable delivers the specific facts you need to know [04:45] What James learned from Unshakeable [05:25] Most people panic when the stock market drops [05:45] Getting rid of your fear of investing [06:15] Last January was the worst opening, but it was a correction [06:45] You are losing money when you sell on corrections [06:55] Bear markets come every 5 years on average [07:10] The greatest opportunity for a millennial [07:40] Waiting for corrections to invest [08:05] Warren Buffet's advice for investors [08:55] If you miss the top 10 trading days a year... [09:25] Three different investor scenarios over a 20 year period [10:40] The best trading days come after the worst [11:45] Investing in the current world [12:05] What Clinton and Bush
think of the current situation [12:45] The office is far bigger than the occupant [13:35] Information helps reduce fear [14:25] James's story of the billionaire upset over another's wealth [14:45] What money really is [15:05] The story of Adolphe Merkle [16:05] The story of Chuck Feeney [16:55] The importance of the right mindset [17:15] What fuels Tony [19:15] Find something you care
about more than yourself [20:25] Make your mission to surround yourself with the right people [21:25] Suffering made Tony hungry for more [23:25] By feeding his mind, Tony found strength [24:15] Great ideas don't interrupt you, you have to pursue them [25:05] Never - ending hunger is what matters [25:25] Richard Branson is the epitome of hunger and drive [25:40] Hunger is the common denominator [26:30] What you can do starting right now [26:55] Success leaves clues [28:10] What it means to take massive action [28:30] Taking action commits you to following through [29:40] If you do nothing you'll learn nothing [30:20] There must be an emotional purpose behind what you're doing [30:40] How does Tony ignite creativity in his own life [32:00] «How is not as important as «why» [32:40] What and why unleash the psyche [33:25] Breaking the habit of focusing on «how» [35:50] Deep Practice [35:10] Your desired outcome will determine your action [36:00] The difference between «what» and «why» [37:00] Learning how to chunk and group [37:40] Don't mistake
movement for achievement [38:30] Tony doesn't negotiate with his mind [39:30] Change your
thoughts and change your biochemistry [40:00] The bad habit of being stressed [40:40] Beautiful and suffering states [41:50] The most important decision is to live in a beautiful state no matter what [42:40] Consciously decide to take yourself out of suffering [43:40] Focus on appreciation, joy and love [44:30] Step out of suffering and find the solution [45:00] Dealing with mercury poisoning [45:40] Tony's process for stepping out of suffering [46:10] Stop identifying with
thoughts — they aren't yours [47:40] Trade your expectations for appreciation [50:00] The key to life — gratitude [51:40] What is freedom for you?
A lot of people
think the coworking
movement is only
about shared office space, which is wrong.
We talk
about creating this resource and why she
thinks the Coworking
movement has been largely...
According to the newly released Last Mile / City Logistics Report from CBRE, the rapid rise of e-commerce has driven the most disruptive
movement to the industrial & logistics industry, transforming the way we
think about industrial real estate.
Before I do that, however, I
think it's important to note one recurring theme I write
about that continues to help our investment team and shareholders better understand the
movement in commodities and energy: the purchasing managers» index (PMI).
Am I missing something
about the whole fact based dogma of the «free -
thinking»
movement?
What started tumbling out of the closets at the time of Stonewall [the late sixties protest by which the
movement marks its beginning] is profoundly altering the way we all live, form families,
think about and act toward one another, manage our health and well - being, and understand the very meaning of identity.
Another coment to say I
think Linda's comment
about the Shepperading
movement struck me as intiutivly genius.
For me (as for most of us in the
movement I
think) it's always been
about ideas and action and communities, not
about any particular personalities or so - called «leaders.»
As much as I would like to say that there simply was no Jesus at all, I don't
think that would be honest assessment of the information that we have
about so many different religious
movements that center around him.
Nothing
about the purity
movement should make any child
think life is not worth living.
I do
think it's important to keep in mind that conversion is not just
about a moment; it's
about a
movement,
about continually changing into the people that God has made us to be.
It was intended to be an educational
movement suitable to a British Empire united not by blood or race but by ideals, among which were that of a moral order involving respect for God, whatever else one might
think about God.
I
think he has a lot to say
about the EC
movement.
To me, always
thinking about efficiency, her
movements seemed burdensome.
Although many of those concerned for environmental protection are
thinking about the natural world simply as it relates to human beings, the leaders of the environmental
movement have been moved to perception and action by deeper changes.
During the 1970s and 80s, many
thought that the theology of liberation would strengthen the Catholic Church through the grassroot
movement of the CEBs, and that the CEBs, in turn, would raise the consciousness of the popular classes, bringing
about serious social change.
The «bounds of possible
thought»
about nuclear weapons may be set by the prevailing «nukespeak,» as Paul Chilton has pointed out (in Nukespeak [Comedia Publishing, 1982]-RRB- But through persistent «peacespeak» they can also be expanded, much as the bounds of possible
thought about race were expanded by the civil rights
movement — under the image - sensitive leadership of Christian ministers.
In all the various expressions of its multiple forms, dialectical
thinking must set itself against the autonomy of that which appears before it, seizing upon the immediate being which is manifest
about it as the initial springboard to its own
movement of negation.
So, what do you all
think about the «house church»
movement?
And there are many different kinds of theology: historical, systematic, practical, black, liberation — in fact, a «theology of» just
about every
movement and topic that requires serious
thought and...
Do you
think that you're the only one who knows
about the conversion of Constantine, the role of the Vandals, Visigoths, Barbarians, the development of the Western (Latin) and Eastern (Greek) Christian communities, the schisms, the monastic
movements, etc.,
In the end, I don't
think the pro-life
movement is
about converting the masses in dramatic fashion, or in one fell sweep.
In October of last year Faith
Movement hosted a public meeting in London for all those interested in learning more
about the
thought of the
movement.
First, I am a professor of philosophy and a professional philosopher, I guess you could say, privy to the philosophical
movements of the twentieth century, many of which, for better or worse, have had an influence on theology and
thinking about religion.
Hegel was wrong, so far as I can tell,
about most things, but he was right at least
about this: the
movement of
thought is, in the sense just mentioned, dialectical.
By working out a neoclassical theory of nonliteral religious discourse consistent with his neoclassical theism generally, he has not only overcome the notorious contradictions involved in classical theism's use of analogy and other modes of nonliteral language, he has also given good reasons for
thinking that our distinctively modern reflection
about God results from two
movements of
thought, not simply from one.
As such, I
thought it might be helpful to share a bit of information
about the
movement to, I hope, make a better conversation.
Hence, even more important than summarizing accurately what they propose will be the effort to trace the
movement of their
thought as they seek to persuade us of the wisdom of their proposals; so too, more important even than identifying where their proposals explicitly or implicitly exclude one another will be the effort to see how tensions among their contrasting but equally valid insights actually bind them together and force us to find new conceptualities, new frames - of - reference for our analyses of what is theological
about theological education.
The need for more careful
thought about social responsibility has not expressed itself only the establishment of the
movement of engaged Buddhists.
My personal opinion at this time is that nothing much will come from THIS
movement except a fair amount of new awareness (who besides a small minority
thought or more importantly discussed their
thoughts about the 99 % before all this?..)
Cecilia, OPPT is a spiritual
movement and I
think a lot of people visiting this blog could be interested to know
about what they are doing.
The two of them and Donald Allchin gathered a group of theologians
about ten years ago, and some of us have continued in the role of «theological accompaniment» with L'Arche, helping the community to
think about what constitutes the «wisdom» of the
movement.