«The focus on just
thinking about standardized test scores as being synonymous with achievement for teenagers is ridiculous, right?»
Not exact matches
But in the book I do argue against the intense national focus on
standardized tests, which measure a fairly narrow range of cognitive skills and turn out to be not very effective predictors of the educational goals that I
think we should care
about, especially college - graduation rates.
GR: What do you
think about this effort on the part of some activist parents to get parents to hold their kids out of school during the
standardized tests that are part of the school evaluations and the teacher evaluations that are a part of the requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act.
Sadly, many of them never make the connection between mind and body, and just keep sinking into those self - defeating
thoughts as they worry
about how they will measure up on the next
standardized test.
«When the
standardized tests begin to
test thinking, I'll care
about the
test scores... but it's not what we want to be doing for kids.
Andrew Miller looks at prep for
standardized testing as an opportunity to encourage higher order
thinking, embed
test prep practices, and make informed decisions
about engaging the class and reaching individual students.
She
thinks it's time for a big debate
about the role of
standardized testing in American public education.
With the second half of the school year in full - swing, many educators are starting to
think about preparing their students for
standardized testing.
I
thought of... Continue reading Paging Ernestine: Long Island Opt - Outers Don't Care
About Standardized Tests Because They Don't Have To.
This guide provides a framework for
thinking about classroom assessment in the middle grades, and challenges the paradigm of
standardized tests.
Only 17 % don't
think schools place enough emphasis on
standardized testing, while just as many (15 %)
think the level of emphasis is
about right.
The sad reality is most people seem to
think gifted students will be «fine» since they are usually capable of passing minimum - competency
standardized tests (which is what school is all
about, right?).
I spend quite a bit of my time
thinking about and researching the topics of high stakes and
standardized testing.
The 2015 scores for the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) are out, and the news isn't good for those who
think standardized test scores tell us something significant
about student achievement.
But then I
think about the state of education right now with the strict grade - level standards, Common Core and
standardized testing — teachers really don't have the freedom or time to attend to the divergent thinkers, non-standard learning or much of anything that veers from what they are required to cover in the classroom.
Overall, as Barbara Madeloni, President of the Massachusetts Teachers Association (MTA), put it, while the current system is not working, Bills S. 308, H. 2860 and H. 2844 would provide a «blueprint for us to
think imaginatively
about what we can do for our schools» without so many millions of teaching hours being devoted to
standardized testing.
And
think about this: If teachers are evaluated on
test scores, there has to be
standardized test for every class.
«People are happy
about that because it means students won't have to take more
standardized tests, and it opens doors for students who
thought they'd never be college bound because they wouldn't be able to pass the SAT.
And many of us simultaneously asserted that
standardized testing, and the MAP
test in particular, is a clumsy form of assessment that often hides more than it reveals
about student knowledge — particularly the
thought process and how a student arrived at particular answer.
The union leadership sees this and gets all jizzy,
thinking about how to steer some of that dough to their own pockets: «The four corporations that dominate the U.S.
standardized testing market spend millions of dollars lobbying state and federal officials — as well as sometimes hiring them — to persuade them to favor policies that include mandated student assessments, helping to fuel a nearly $ 2 billion annual
testing business, a new analysis shows.
When
thinking about school quality, many people tend to gravitate to a single measure: results on
standardized tests.
These folks have never seen a
standardized test they didn't
think could unlock the secrets of the universe, and they are just not having any questions
about silly notions of «validity,» «reliability,» or «appropriateness» of these
tests.