Sentences with phrase «thinking about the definition»

It did not change what I was thinking about the definition of church, but only confirmed it, proving (at least to me) that I was on the right track.

So you should really think about your definition of «religion».

Think about the definition of compromise.

A Key concepts sheet to get pupils thinking about the definitions of key words and what examples they can think for each of them.

One day later, I have some second thoughts about the definition of confidence intervals — e.g., a 95 % CI.

Thinking about the definition of stress that way helps out a lot.

What might resonate with them is if we go back and think about the definition of stress to begin with.

Thinking about the definition of what is an «offence» or any other term used to define what acts are covered by the policy, will the hypothetical e & o insurer take the position that there's a coverage issue here if, in fact, the VSA knew that his or her skills were better, since then the VSA is intending the result that occurred?

(As I typed the word «mere,» which has become coined as part of a new phrase identity: mere listing, I couldn't help but think about the definition of the word itself.

Not exact matches

But focus, by definition, narrows the scope of our thinking, and given how complex and fast moving most business problems are, we should relearn the skill of simply opening our mind and giving ourselves half an hour to think, in an unstructured, creative way, about whatever pops up.

Marks arrived at more or less the same definition of liquidity as Hooper, writing that the way to think about liquidity isn't to ask if there is a market for an asset, but whether you can quickly sell that an asset without taking a huge loss on it.

If you've been forgetting the classic definition from 1996, the part about managing your emotions and influencing, try thinking about how you can make changes in your own job or your company that tap into that deeper meaning of the concept.

There's a definition of entrepreneurship that has changed how I think about the way people choose their paths in life.

I think there's a wider sort of macroeconomic and social policy issue that we all need to be aware about, and also we all need to maybe come together about some new definitions of what work is and how opportunities are being created, also.

After reading and thinking about all of this, I stand by my (relatively) broad definition of an entrepreneur — namely, that anyone who takes on the risk of working for him or herself is (at least one type of) an entrepreneur.

Almost by definition, a PE firm thinking about acquiring a target in a particular healthcare market will know less about that market than a corporate buyer who does business in it every day.

I do not mean a narrow economist's definition, but rather the whole way of thinking about inflation in business, government and the community generally.

Given the diversity of views about the definition of scalability, perhaps it is best thought of as a phenomena where «you know it when you see it.»

Anything thoughts about that would be interesting but specifically re the book a very simple question, on page 97 he gives some key withdrawal rate definitions but not the definition of inflation adjusted withdrawal rate.

Jeff, I think, if we need to get strict about what religion is, we should limit its definition to these qualities --

Just as history brings freedom from rigid role definitions, it may also give us the freedom to think seriously again about what it means to be not simply a unisex parent, but a mother or father in particular.

A divorce is by definition a clash of competing truths and do you think we can get to the truth of it all on an online forum in order to then make a larger point about theology and spiritual leadership?

I was out for a run today thinking about the term «heretic» and it occurred to me that I obviously don't share the same definition with those that throw it around with a scornful tone of judgment.

By definition, a theological school is about theology in its broadest sense of the term: logos, speaking thoughtfully or thinking articulately and clearly about theos, God.

If you think about the Song of Miriam or those dangerous songs (many of which are in the mouths of women), we are invited to join that kind of singing which is a refusal to accept the dominant definitions of reality.

Even the modern Unitarian, insofar as he or she would make claim to the Christian name whatever may be thought about theological definitions of Jesus Christ's significance, will say that his or her religion is toward God as God is defined by Jesus Christ — which is to say that the specifically Christian understanding of God must be in terms of what Whitehead styled «the Galilean vision.

To bad they have all that religious propoganda on there walls... Trust me religion is for sheep... Every definition of god was given by man... If you actually think about it... They all can't be right!

Technically autism is a neurodevelopmental disorder, but I think we'd be quibbling about definitions here.

if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.

This definition, however, is immediately followed by a proviso: «after all those metaphysicians were right who said — you simply can't think about pure abstract being; they were right in this sense, that when you do think about it (which in effect they admit you can do, or the words pure abstract being, which they themselves use, would be words without any meaning whatever) you find that it won't stay pure» (TNMS 10).

This definition does not imply that metaphysics does not deal with reality and only refers to thinking about reality.19 As stated above, in An Essay on Metaphysics, Collingwood does not intend to expound his own metaphysical ideas, but to give a justification of the metaphysical project.

My guess (and the source of your tension) is that you're fearing and thinking more about the first or second definition, but hung up on the third one.

There is only one God... human imagine or uses their thoughts to come up with multiple Gods... which i think is lake of understanding about the definition of God... i also think the reason we see this is mostly because the teaching of these faiths are showing God as an old dude with white long beard and extended hands... its all human imaginations...

@ anvil once again — you talk about ignorance, but you are the definition of it completely — man check out this book — Ultimate proof of Creation — Jason Lisle, read the book then think about your statements — unless your afraid

You notice that that definition does not say anything at all about the sort of prayer (which for many people exhausts the subject) which is concerned with the coercing of God so that He will give us what we think we need.

You don't really think this about a bureaucratic or even scientific definition of «white» do you, although that might be MK's «get out of jail card»?

so really, we are attracted to david's cartoons because he is not properly trained (or has wrestled with the definition, i would think) and he is very open about it.

And, although he suggests several ways in which Gloria and her World Outreach Task Force might go about thinking about mission and developing a definition for their church, he does not elaborate a procedure or framework for actually doing it.

He was a featured speaker at Operation Rescue events and publicly defended two players accused of date rape by saying, «Rape by definition is a violent act, and I don't think that's what we're talking about here.»

From what I see, I think this is highly ironic, because it is you who is guilty of illegitimate totality transfer by claiming «there are about 50 things the NT includes in its definition of «Gospel»» on your «Gospel Word Study» chart!!!

In this context, theology is given a teleological definition: «The major task of theology and ethics is to encourage students to think globally as Christians about the issues of the day.

It know it will always be hard to describe what exactly you do or exactly who you are, but form the blog and your creative environment and your definitions and words and visuals and job description and personal profile to you (not the other way around), and don't worry about people misunderstanding or misreading or thinking it is something else or expecting something more or less, that will always happen and that very thing, in fact, proves to be the greatest opportunity to learn to communicate better and more clearly (at least for me).

@ mama k: while science may explore & attempt to understand what can be known about the physical universe, it's a failure to understand the very definition of metaphysics to think that somehow leads into a «God of the gaps» scenario.

While the impact of these classical theories has remained strong, I would like to point to a specific contribution that, in my view, has served as a kind of watershed in our thinking about the cultural dimension of religion: Clifford Geertz's essay «Religion as a Cultural System,» published in 1966.1 Although Geertz, an anthropologist, was concerned in this essay with many issues that lay on the fringes of sociologists» interests, his writing is clear and incisive, the essay displays exceptional erudition, and it provides not only a concise definition of religion but also a strong epistemological and philosophical defense of the importance of religion as a topic of inquiry.

C. H. Dodd gives this definition: «At its simplest, the parable is a metaphor or simile, drawn from nature or common life, arresting the hearer by its vividness or strangeness, and leaving the mind in sufficient doubt about its precise application to tease it into active thought.

«I'm not stripping away the definition of local, I'm giving you something to think about,» Martin says.

(Don't ask about the definition of a bread's crumb — I can't explain it, but I think these have it.).

... AKBs and their definition for success and why that potato head should continue turning the club to a laughing stock... i get so confused when some people will stay in the most competitive league in the world and still be happy to just compete for top four... even the sick manager is thinking about a «top four» like the whole years of embarrassment has not been enough especially for fans who spend their hard earned money to watch home games as well as buy club apparels...

If a woman had a deliciously exciting sexual time in her 20s, or a few long - term committed relationships or perhaps a combo, and then had a dearth of partners in her mid - to late - 30s, when she may be thinking about having a child, the definition of the «right man to marry» may change, clarity be damned.

But I'm starting to think about the depth of that advice, and how the definition of «helpers» can stretch to include an array of people in completely different contexts.