They don't
think about reader.
So it better to
think about reader at first then search engine.
Had any of us bloggers ever
thought about readers misunderstanding our message?
Many thanks for
thinking about readers like me, and I want for you the best of success being a professional in this surface area.
Thanks again for
thinking about readers like me, and I wish you the best of acivheements being a professional in this field.
You need to
think about readers and the stages they're at: those who've had no exposure to your books, those who know your name, those who've bought one of your books... 22 Ways to Promote Your E-Book suggests some ways to slice - and - dice content, to make your funnel as wide as possible:
I only have to
think about the reader.
When evaluating the design of your book,
think about the readers who you wrote it for and your goal for publishing it
Thinking about readers and marketability will only stifle creativity in the first draft.
Have
you thought about the readers?
Reviewers do their best to
think about the reader, and even when they feel bad for the writer, the reviewer isn't doing her job if she doesn't give an honest appraisal.
He argues that when he's writing, he's not
thinking about the reader.
As soon as your book goes up on NetGalley, as soon as your publicist starts mailing out ARCs, you begin
thinking about reader reviews.
While writing a thesis,
think about the reader and keep in mind that your audience are not the experts in this field.
Over the years (16 to date), blogging's been my default setting; it helps me to explore ideas, and
think about readers.
How
Thinking About Your Readers Will Sell More Books • Why shouting «Buy my book» isn't enough anymore • Case studies of authors who went outside the box (and sometimes over the top!)
Ideally, you have been
thinking about your reader throughout the writing of your book, so you have a picture firmly planted in your brain.
Always
think about the readers, keep in mind their level of knowledge.
How
Thinking About Your Readers Will Sell More Books Presented by Shari Stauch A recording of this session is now available to IBPA members only.
When
I thought about my readers, I lumped them all into one huge bucket.
Good ones are
thinking about the reader's needs.
A friend suggested RepliGo Reader do you have
any thoughts about a reader suited for college work?
From advice on raising your author profile to formatting for print or ebooks, to digging into analytics and a new way of
thinking about readers and authors.
What I have found is that the best bloggers
think about their readers before their egos and wallets.
I'm always
thinking about my readers and my blog everywhere I go.
I've always enjoyed photography, and when I travel now
I think about readers on my blog and try to get the best pictures to display.
Think about your readers and what attitude to your personality you want to generate.
Again, the purpose of your resume is to generate interviews, not be overlooked because you didn't take the time to
think about the reader and what he / she may want to see.
Think about a reader and make your resume easy to understand and follow.
Not exact matches
No, the real reason to write a book is because there is something you have to explore that you
think readers want to learn
about, not because you
think putting «author» on your LinkedIn profile is smart.
No, this book won't offer you many chuckles, but it might help
readers break through our culture's unhelpful silence around our inevitable end and
think through how to go
about the final chapter of life with some dignity.
I don't know that it's something a
reader would really
think about, but it's part of a larger relationship.
Billionaire and avid
reader Bill Gates has a new favorite book: «Factfulness: Ten Reasons We're Wrong
About the World — and Why Things Are Better Than You
Think.»
Just
think about what actually makes kids «cool» in high school, a recent PsyBlog post urges
readers.
You might not
think you're that interesting, but the funny thing
about networks is that even if you are boring (surely, you mustn't be, given that you're a Fortune
reader), hackers may still aim to A) profit from your misfortune, and B) use you as stepping stone to get at someone else.
If you're a non-gamer
reader, you're probably already
thinking about giving this post a pass, but stick around — it may yet interest you.
Yahoo had to deal with some nasty shareholder activist campaigns, and several
readers asked
about your
thoughts on activism.
So I
think as long as
readers — whether they admit it publicly or not — as long as
readers have a hunger for true, critical, funny stories
about how the system works and
about the concentration of money and power in modern society, as long as they have that appetite, then a site like Gawker.com is going to have a continued purpose.
In today's divided world, this book brings
readers a fundamental message to show more love to those we lead, deliver compassion, develop people in a more intentional way (
think about how Jesus built up his followers over a deeply committed three - year period), and finally, be willing to forgive.
Many of the environmentalists who responded angrily to Steiner beseech
readers to, as the Minneapolis non-profit wrote, «
think about «profits» a little more broadly» to include the job creation and environmental benefits that recycling brings.
Again, get feedback from your
readers and community to find out what they
think about what you offer.
the New York newspaper asked, offering plenty of photos to help
readers make up their own minds
about the story of a woman fired from her job at Citibank because, she claimed, her managers and co-workers
thought she was too attractive.
I have this conversation Sofa King often that I'm sure each
reader who has met me will
think that I'm talking
about you.
Instead he tells
readers that proponents of a tax haven't
thought about its consequences and uncritically repeats every piece of nonsense produced by the financial industry to attack the idea.
Not that the occasional typo bothers me, but, being a freelance editor and proofreader (yes, there is a difference), I find that more than two or three in a post and I take off my «interested
reader» hat and put on my «eagle - eyed editor» hat without even
thinking about it.
Today, I was having a discussion with a close friend
about the fact that very few people view individual stocks for what they are - proportional ownership in a business that must be evaluated on an enterprise - level to determine their relative attractiveness - and
thought that allowing my
readers to be a «fly on the wall» would provide some insight into the methodology Ben Graham made so famous.
«And in example after example, radical notion after radical notion, Jay and Shel don't just make the assertion
about something that challenges everything we
thought we knew
about marketing — they give
readers chapter - and - verse examples that make the case for one simple concept after another that... well, could just revolutionize everything.
Advertising to non-fans instead of building a fan base and then engaging them sounded like a dangerous plan at first, and I
think it's very (very) important that your
readers know that you're only talking
about advertising to reach a highly targeted group of people (which in your case means website vistors).
And I'm glad
readers are still asking me
about it, because I'm still
thinking about it.