Sentences with phrase «thinking about your legal problem»

Do you really want to be thinking about your legal problem constantly for the next several years?

Thus, the Romans were the first to have a class of people who spent their days thinking about legal problems, and this transactions are handled by civil law notaries.

Last March, at the Legal IT conference I pleaded that lawyers should also be trained (or train themselves) «in innovation [by which I mean technological innovation]» and that, as a profession, we should therefore train ourselves to code and, more generally, to think about legal problems systemically and algorithmically.

Not exact matches

The format of «Tigers» beautifully reflects this fear as the audience were able to see the doubts, legal problems and thought process that both Ayan and the actual film directors had about releasing the film and using the MNC's real name instead of Lastavita Foods.

He added that he knew about Espada's legal problems (the Attorney General is suing him for looting $ 14 million from his network of nonprofit health centers, for one), but, «He's not the only one — many politicians have some problems, mostly the Puerto Rican ones — but we think he's the best [to serve] this community.»

Lawyers who participate in these activities, law firms that participate, who become part of the thought leadership and who are seen by their clients as investing in thought leadership and partnering with law schools like ours to help to better train and educate the next generation of lawyers who are thought to be thinking seriously about the challenges facing not just lawyers of the legal profession but our clients, I think those kinds of lawyers will be rewarded because clients at all levels know that it's an increasingly complex and sophisticated and challenging world and they're looking for lawyers who understand that and can help them with their problems.

The ability to think creatively about legal problems wasn't as useful.

If you share our perspective that the business of law can be better... if you recognize that yesterday's thinking won't solve tomorrow's problems... if you're passionate about finding better approaches to the most serious challenges facing the legal community... then get in touch at [email protected] and get to know Apogee as we transform the business of law through practical application of artificial intelligence.

We are used to developing substantive expertise in unfamiliar legal issues.95 An effective LRW problem needs to challenge the students to think creatively about research, to use the available sources effectively, and to take on the role of counselor or advocate.96 Including the world broadens the possibilities for problem issues and enriches existing problems by adding a new dimension.

So how should we start thinking about that when we think about the construction of the legal system and how to solve that problem?

Usually we're talking about young women who want to know these stories, they want to know the background those are the perfect candidates for the intake position because we don't want them trying to solve this person's problem and most of us even after a few months in the legal industry, we think we have enough information to jump to solving.

What I think is most unique about it, however, is its multi-disciplinary approach, recognizing the sociological aspect of many legal problems.

Today we're talking with our friend Nicole Bradick about using design thinking to build tech solutions to legal problems, and about why none of that can probably fix some of the problems built into the legal system today.

That is why the least you could do to yourself is diagnose what is actually your problem because especially if you think about the legal profession, both in the US but also especially here in the UK, it hasn't actually changed much since Dickens» times in the last 200 years.

I think that comes up a lot where lawyers, like many people, I don't want to make this just all about lawyers but it is a specific problem that we see in the legal industry where lawyers just want an answer.

I guess maybe what I'm thinking is that by opening up the window, by learning how to code, learning what's possible, it lets you see a different way of serving clients and solving legal problems, and part of me thinks that, as new possibilities come online, new ways of serving clients by building tools that fix things, like this parking ticket app, like a service that allows lawyers to build a referral network that makes them look more like a giant, spread out firm, and other things, as these possibilities come out there, you can stop thinking about serving just one client's legal needs, and start thinking about solving that legal problem for anyone who comes to you.

Sam Glover: You talked about analyzing legal issues from TV shows, for example, which some lawyers do that and I wonder if that is helpful in sort of branding and raising your profile, but I wonder about it in terms of search engine optimization because people aren't searching for those kinds of legal problems and the kinds of people that come across your post if it goes viral, I mean it sounds awesome to get thousands or hundreds of thousands of hits on a post, but those aren't clients so I wonder how you think about stuff like that, you know kind of going for publicity seeking posts?

After engaging this afternoon in a discussion about a number of issues related to ongoing access to justice, I continued thinking about the barriers that stand between ordinary people with legal problems and their effective access to justice.

That goes to something we've talked about before on the podcast which is realize that lawyers tend to be myopic thinking about, «There is a legal problem and I have the solution to it,» rather than, «My client has a problem, one aspect of which is a legal problem that I was trained to solve in law school, but there's a bigger problem that I can help solve.»

I think they apply whether we're talking about individuals who definitely are under - served by lawyers today, but I think it goes all the way up to the largest clients, too, where there are large corporates that have all these legal needs that aren't being met because it's just not either packaged or priced in a way that works for them to get these problems solved.

Elie and Joe talk with Steve Silver of The Legal Blitz about all the off the field problems associated with «OMG I think that's brain coming out of his ear» - Ball.

A collection of essays about improving access to justice... Closing the Justice Gap: some new thinking about an old problem... produced by the legal research company Jures this month, and published by the Solicitors Journal in association with the Young Legal Aid Lawyers was launched at our fifth birtlegal research company Jures this month, and published by the Solicitors Journal in association with the Young Legal Aid Lawyers was launched at our fifth birtLegal Aid Lawyers was launched at our fifth birthday.

Legal blogs can help shape how those communities think about particular legal probLegal blogs can help shape how those communities think about particular legal problegal problems.

I don't think we should stop talking about AI, but I do think we should focus on tackling problems that are still plaguing the legal industry that a robot drafting a legal pleading from scratch can't solve.

The objective of this model is to provide a design language for thinking about, and solving, legal engineering problems.

Since I've designated today as a day to think about ethics, it's worth quoting from a recent US judgment on a issue that had and has both legal and moral implications that comes from the boomer days — the Viet Nam war and the consequences of the use of Agent Orange — and comparing that to how the Canadian government handled the problem that produced Authorson v Canada.

And right now, legal hackers seem to be getting their projects mainly from municipalities and a few «thought leaders» within the academe — people who generally don't have the kind of deep knowledge about legal problems facing solo and small - firm lawyers and their clients that would be necessary to come up with a list of problems to solve.

More broadly, prior to being a lawyer, I used to be an avid reader of Edward de Bono's work on thinking, including vertical, horizontal and parallel thinking, along with his «Six Hats» approach to thinking, and would like to re-read his work with an eye to seeing how applicable it would be to thinking strategically about legal problems.

Since I've designated today as a day to think about ethics, it's worth quoting from a recent US judgment on a issue that had and has both legal and moral implications that comes from the boomer days — the Viet Nam war and the consequences of the use of Agent Orange — and comparing that to how the Canadian government handled the problem that produced Authorson v Canada... [more]

It is hard to describe exactly, but I am thinking really of inculcating a mind - set or habits of thinking: approaching legal problems as a lawyer thinking about the practical needs of their client, as opposed to as an abstract, philosophical or intellectual problem.

Do I even bother to contact you when I think you are angry or an injustice collector and may be a problem, a legal risk, or will say negative things about me or my company?

If you think about it, all legal problems were human problems before they became legal problems.