Sentences with phrase «thinking as she reviews»

-- that's what the hiring manager is thinking as she reviews your letter.

Not exact matches

«When I think about how I understand my role as citizen, setting aside being president, and the most important set of understandings that I bring to that position of citizen, the most important stuff I've learned I think I've learned from novels,» he recently told The New York Review of Books.

University program designers can review a cross-section of portfolios to glean invaluable information about whether their programs are helping students develop core overarching skills, such as writing, ethical savvy and critical thinking.

You can always review thoughts or sayings later if they're recorded, but trying to recall them out of thin air is only as good as your memory allows.

Second, as Harvard Business Review's Eric Lowett points out, there's a subtle undertone to Patagonia's reuse effort that tells customers its products are high - quality — think: they're so durable, they're reusable.

As the newspaper's executive opinion editor, I reviewed both op - eds and thought they were worth publishing.

«When I think about how I understand my role as citizen... the most important stuff I've learned I think I've learned from novels,» Obama told The New York Review of Books.

But I'm reading everything but I read books a lot and Mystic River you mentioned, I read that as a... I read a review of it in the paper and I thought that sounds good and I went out to Costco and got a quick copy of it.

Rather than blindly checking off items as they come up, I use my thinking day to review the list and evaluate which ones are truly a priority.

As mentioned already, you don't want the people reviewing your resume to assume anything, so think about those questions a hiring manager could potentially have about your resume and background, and answer them directly in your resume or cover letter.

After dropping out of a PhD program at Duke University to, in his own words «pursue a life of thought - crime,» Spencer worked as an editor at a variety of right - leaning publications including Taki's Magazine, American Conservative, and the National Review, and was fired from the latter two for his extreme and racist views.

Several large, recent, peer - reviewed studies have suggested a fascinating but seemingly counterintuitive idea: That the amount of fat you eat may not be as directly linked with how fat you are as we once thought.

Since the trade followed through as anticipated, we thought it would be helpful to share an educational technical review of why we originally entered the trade and subsequently sold when we did.

Think of a performance review as an ongoing, collaborative approach, as illustrated by the graphic below.

I wrote about my thoughts on Markel as an investment idea a few years ago, which you can review if you're interested in reading more about the business.

We often think of reviews as something to only pay attention to when they're bad.

The LRC runs lively, expert reviews of Canadian books — as well as the occasional foreign title, if on a Canadian subject or considered alongside Canadian titles on the same theme — and essays by some of the country's most thought - provoking writers.

As the editor of MIT Technology Review, I spend much of my time thinking about the types of stories and journalism that will be most valuable to our readers.

In a recent Harvard Business Review article, Tim Evans cited Southwest Airlines as having been a disruptive force in the airline industry because of co-founder Herb Kelleher's ability to «think something different.»

This was reviewed here sometime back, think it could benefit from another look as I think they must have reduced their charges

I thought of this statement as I reviewed strategies with a group of sales and marketing executives recently.

As an investor counsel myself, I don't think reviewing the NVCA forms is any easier than reviewing [fill in name of typical Silicon Valley firm] forms.

As I wrote in my Personal Capital review after sitting down with CEO Bill Harris for 1.5 hours, I think the business model of leveraging technology to gather and manage assets is a no brainer.

There are not a lot of holes in this website that would make us really stop and think before signing up to trade with them; as a matter of fact, we just came across outstanding feature after outstanding feature when reviewing them.

This is consistent with the same policies of other internet brokers but something that we feel needs to be reduced across the industry as a whole; we have mentioned this train of thought in several of the reviews we have done when it comes to withdrawing bonus money.

The following part of this review will deal with options for different accounts as well as what we thought about the experience of trading through this platform.

However, as I also said in the review, His Eminence states that he was provoked into writing the book because theologians who talked about divine attributes tended to treat mercy as a marginal attribute of God, because traditionally it was thought that mercy did not pertain to God's essence.

After reading, reviewing, and writing on Hannah Arendt, I have come to think of her, fairly or otherwise, as a special voice, one of many» they range from Thomas Mann to Karl Jaspers to Marlene Dietrich» who came through the fires of hell called Nazi Germany with their consciences intact.

And consider the CRU e-mail comment on a journal that committed the mortal sin of publishing one of the heretical papers: «I think we have to stop considering Climate Research as a legitimate peer - reviewed journal.

In my day job as the editor of The Englewood Review of Books, I've staked my life and work on the hope that reading carefully and well will undoubtedly transform us, reforming the ways that we think, talk about and live within this wondrous web of life that is God's creation.

At first I thought I shouldn't be the person reviewing this book, as it's clearly meant for priests.

Lest anyone think I am praising my own efforts, let me say that I should be very pleased if my own modest book review could be seen as a footnote to some of the outstanding articles.

Moreover, recent scholarship, especially by philosopher Karsten Harries («Heidegger as Political Thinker,» Review of Metaphysics, 1976, pp. 642 - 69), bears out the notion that an inner relation exists between Heidegger's general ontology in Being and Time and his Nazi - period thought and action.

There are many who like Zahnd's thinking because, as Rachel Held Evans says in her review of the book, «Zahnd cuts through all the fear and fundamentalism to reveal a gospel that is indeed good news.»

A general review of the endnotes from Gunter's paper reveals a fair number of sources who will corroborate the claim that Bergson's scientific views are nor only not outdated, but go very» much to the heart of current scientific methods and insights, but particularly, see A. C. Papanicolaou and Pete A. N. Gunter, eds., Bergson in Modern Thought Towards a Unified Science (New York: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1987), and for important background on how Bergson came to be seen as dated when he was not, see also, Milic Capek, Bergson and Modern Physics, (cited above) and The Philosophical Impact of Contemporary Physics (Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, 1961), and the volume edited by Gunter, Bergson and the Evolution of Physics (cited above).

One wonderful thing about the fountain pen reviews as a genre is that the average pen fiend cares about all the things I think about when buying an ink.

The author reviews a book by Stanley Hauerwas: When Hauerwas asserts that liberal Christians are those who take «humans, not God, as the center of Christian faith,» or when he says that one of «the most cherished conceits of modernity» is that «humans are the measure of all that is,» he reveals that he has not thought hard enough about what liberalism and modernity mean to their proponents.

BTW, while reviews are used as the process of inquiry for sexual misconduct, reviews are far more common than you think.

Balanced as a Beemer, and as refreshing as a power shower, have you ever thought about reviewing «The Shack» and telling us if it is pagan or not, also could you expand a bit on your «take» on tithing, excusing the pun.

My first thought after reading your review is that his view of the Bible as dialog would seem to deny the Holy Spirit as being the author of Scripture, and would attack the idea that the Word — a.k.a. Jesus — became flesh and pitched his tent among us.

In my review I was not referring so much to his concession (quoted by Mr. Ghelardi) that if God does not exist then natural selection is our best available candidate for how complex forms came to be» although that quote certainly is as good an indication as any of my contention that the design argument will only end up becoming a breeding ground for atheism, a fetid terrarium for a whole new brood of Richard Dawkinses (not a pleasant thought, that).

One thinks, for instance, of Michael Novak's On Two Wings, which makes a strong case for the Founders» Hebraic understanding of history, as well as providing a marvelous florilegium of their statements about providential purpose (see review, FT May 2002).

Waldstein's very fine review, if mystified as to why the latter thinks I go too far in the elision of nature and grace.

These are the two changes, then, that I myself take to be most important as I review the course of my recent theological thinking.

I think you need to review your thinking, because you come off as a very confused person

In an interview recently published in the National Review, Robert P. George remarked that, as a Catholic, Richard retained something of the character of the Lutheran pastor he once had been, but I do not think that that was so.

So as I began to review scripture, I began to say, «Wait a minute, maybe this isn't as strong a condemnation as I think it is.

I'm waiting for a review copy of «Good Without God» that I think will be of interest as well.

But then one more train of thought: Just as I was swamped in the raging Galilee and the issues it raises, I ran across Scott Stossel's review of Stumbling on Happiness, a book by Daniel Gilbert, a Harvard professor of psychology who studies happiness (New York Times, May 7).

Although I think Jeremy Waldron is a bit over the top when he describes my review as «actively misleading» for stating, incorrectly, that there were no interrogations at Abu Ghraib, he is both correct and right to point out that there were such interrogations; insofar as his letter illustrates that factual errors undercut a criticism of someone else's factual errors, I take his point.