Not exact matches
And Luther laughed at advisers, medical and spiritual: «Whatever one does in the world is wrong... One physician advises me to bathe my feet at bedtime, another
before dinner, a third in the morning, a fourth at noon... So it is in other things: if I
speak I am
thought turbulent, if I
keep silence I am
thought to spit on the cross.
Thinking a little more
before speaking will
keep you from saying stupid sh!t.
I even
thought top clubs were in for him.Some three or 2 seasons back many here were debating why he should be our main striker.As soon as you mention any other strikers name people would come out with stats and many things defending him.Even Wenger has defended him blindly in the past.People say Wenger's stubborn yeah.But don't we know that there's a reason why everything happens?Honestly
speaking he's the reason why Arsene Wenger has failed to sign a top notch striker because he still believes in him.The funny thing is we signed Welbeck at that time who to me did nothing
before to be the main man here.People
keep saying Welbeck is hardworking and that he works his socks off.But the question is was that our reason for signing him.Welbeck being signed to challenge Giroud tells me a lot about Giroud's quality.Even Walcott (no offence to him) who has zero CF qualities was even chosen over him for a string of games and all in all I
think he did well but has too many defeciencies for that role.We've compromised as a club and it'll come back to bite us.
People are so used to the pretty soccer the past arsenal brought you, you expect everyone to be that quality but here is the thing, i wouldn't sell Theo just for the fact the morons who wrote this story actually
thinks arsenal will
keep this formation so selling a player because of a formation is ludicrous and stupid so I suggest you take your heads out your asses and learn something
before speaking!
To put it another way, while I'm more than sympathetic to Jonathan's desire to read Karen Ordahl Kupperman's book about early America
before weighing in on The New World (I
speak as one who read four different books about feudal Japan
before writing my review of The Last Samurai a few years back), I
think it's also essential to
keep in mind the fact that most audiences who see the film will come to it with very little, if any, historical background, and that to a certain extent the film even asks to be read ahistorically.