Sentences with phrase «thinking is at»

This sort of thinking is at the root of most church growth methodology.

«I think we're at a point where Detroit can be a model for other communities, to really make sure it's an equitable and inclusive city,» said Boyle.

If you think you're at the top, you'll sell.

Albert Wenger of Union Square Ventures did that when I think we were at 14 people.

«Don't delude yourself into thinking you're at risk only in a volatile Eastern European or third - world country.»

The know - it - all thinks she's at a meeting of one, with everyone else serving as her audience.

Price - to - sales is I think is at four times.

In this clip from the March 10, 2009 edition of CNBC's Squawk on the Street, the late Mark Haines tells Erin Burnett, «I think we're at a bottom.

«We think we're at or near full employment in the U.S. Wed expect headline unemployment to dip below 4 percent during this year.»

And we think we're at one of those points.»

I don't think we're at panic time by any means.

There's no doubt that Down N» Out is inspired by In - N - Out, but from looking at the menus and social - media accounts of the two companies, I don't think anyone who walked into the Australian chain would really think they were at the American company — any more than somebody who went to Outback Steakhouse in the U.S. might actually think they'd somehow wound up in Australia.

I thought about the loss that my child had suffered without even knowing it of going from thinking she was at five, or four at the time, a Fortune Most Powerful Woman, to asking me what a bimbo is.

Because I'm 39, Personal Capital still thinks I'm at least a couple decades away from retirement.

Since POTUS has described Kim Jong - un as «Rocket Man» in tweets, let's pray there is hope in these future discussions that reflect Elton John's lyrics in the song: «I'm not the man they think I am at home.»

I get that logic, but I think it's at least a little hard to maintain it at the same time as claiming to be data driven.

Not sure if this is an Austrian theory per se (in fact I don't think it is at all) but it's certainly something I keep hearing about in the crypto forums and at crypto debates.

I know I haven't read all of them related to the subject, but I think I'm at least aware of them.

I do have a small portfolio where I buy individual stocks that I think are at a good value, but it's a very small makeup of my overall portfolio.

According to extensive interviews Recode conducted with former and current employees at the self - driving effort, many think it is at a technological standstill and plagued by significant internal tension, especially among its executive leadership.

A 6 percent yield suggests investors think it's at risk.

«I think we are at the bottom for gold.

These are really tough political issues... It's hard to get the public excited until we're at a critical stage and I think we're at the critical stage now.»

my thoughts are at http://bostonvcblog.typepad.com/vc/2007/09/the-rebirth-of-.html a post from late 2007...

I am not sure that I would want to flatly disagree with that formulation, but I think it is at least potentially misleading.

Hawaii... I appreciated the debate, but I think we're at a standstill (and I'll let you have the last post if you want it).

I think it's at the last supper, not sure.

I've experienced it everywhere — this culture of personality, willfulness, and arrogant self - indulgence, and I think it's at the root of our societal and economic crisis.

But so many of you have been on the journey with me for so long that I felt like I needed to share a bit about where my thoughts were at after a summer of quiet in this space.

If there is such a thing as Emergent anymore, I think the ones who think they are at the helm would be best to clear things up if they care more for it to move on more then they care for themselves moving on.

I can't even imagine what his thoughts were at that moment.

Do you know how many men I have slept with for money who have told me that their wives think they are at the gym?

Some might say I was ashamed of the Gospel, but I don't think that was it at all.

On this view, Madison's thought was at once both modern and «neoclassical.»

At what point in the corruption of Christianity do you think we're at Christians?

That's a hard message, but I think it is at the heart of what it means to be Christian.

@NL: Yes, that would be a good step, but I don't think we are at the point yet where people are ready to take on that discussion openly face - to - face.

In summary, I found that your views aren't quite what I'd thought they were at first.

Everyone seemed to truly think they were at a concert.

It's hard to know what it means, exactly, or why they think it's at least a symptom of evildoing.

However, large catholic families are at risk because she targets pastoral implementation of a doctrine that she herself, the thought being at the core realist aristotelian, would not object to.

Now the FOLLOWERS thought they were at end times..

In doing so, Gunter shows how the tensions in Bergson's thought are at bottom mutually supportive.

Indeed it only exacerbates tendencies that I think are at the heart of our problems.

Apparently, my ability to put words together in ways that make sense to someone other than myself isn't as good as I think it is at times.

I think it was at the beginning of August.

I should say that to me, the exciting thing about the first book is that I think it was at this time Wieman had been almost poetically, aesthetically, religiously aroused by Whitehead.

It may be said, I believe, that once more the enterprise of reconception in the light of process - thought is at least a «respectable» one in theological circles.

As often in these pages our Cutting Edge and Letters columns highlight approaches to science and religion which we think are at the heart of the modern crisis given the fundamental role of human observation of the physical realm to human thought.

There are interesting challenges here to the conventional narrative, but confidence in the author's credibility is severely undermined by his getting through the story with nary a reference to a certain bishop, Karol Wojtyla, who almost everybody else thinks was at the center of it.