Where I believe
your thinking is in error is that you judge what the EU will do by your * own * priorities, which very obviously does NOT include climate change.
So
I think it is in error to try and apply the supposed goal of world wide and absolute peace onto the concept of religion, when no religion has set out to achieve that goal.
I think that is in error but you can't or won't see that.
Though I think it's in error to say that Jesus would be either a Dem or Repub... I think he would be for the concept of the people as a unit having health care that is assisted by the majority of a nation.
If we decide to do this, we will re-credit your account within ten (10) business days for the amount
you think is in error, so that you will have the use of the money during the time it takes us to complete our investigation.
What part of that do
you think is in error?
He doesn't just say that
he thinks it is in error.
If
you think I am in error, please quote exactly the words with which you disagree, and provide some facts to support yourself.
Not exact matches
But after she went to bed, Snyder figured it out: «I woke up
in the middle of the night
thinking what that
error was... I came
in, made a special trip on the early train that morning to look at a certain wire.»
«That
's a rounding
error in Texas» budget,» said economist Frederick Floss, executive director of the Fiscal Policy Institute, a New York - based
think tank that has researched the issue of immigration and state economics.
In fact the NY Fed manufacturing figure
was so bad, many initially
thought it
was an
error.
I
think it
is difficult to know where the next crisis will come from, and,
in general, it
is better to have a system that
is safe from
errors in judgment and surprise than it
is to try and avoid
errors in judgment and surprises because as along as you
are dealing with human
beings, there will
be errors and surprises.
HASTINGS: Well, the mistakes
in Pure
was that every time we had a significant
error — sales call didn't go well, bug
in the code — we tried to
think about it
in terms of, what process could we put
in place to ensure that this doesn't happen again, and thereby improving the company?
I
think there
's an
error in the accounting identies (chapter 2).
No doubt many of you sharp - eyed readers will have spotted a spelling
error,
thinking I intended to refer to one of these: But,
in fact, I really did have
in mind something more like this: We
are following an example from the recently published Mathematica Beyond Mathematics by Jose Sanchez Leon, an up - to - date text that...
As
was expected
in that case, there
was a simple coding
error on the part of Parity and as they
were requesting a hard fork many
were thinking back to the precedent that
was set from the DAO rescue.
@Chuckles I
was not
being hostile, but
am just trying to point out that you
are basically willing to conflate any similar cognitive
errors such as we have as humans as
being significant
in any way
in religious terms, should it happen that we encounter some alien species that also has idiots who
think imaginary stuff
is real.
Highlighting the importance of the Church
in not shying away from politics Rev O'Donoghue said: «Where there
is wickedness, and where there
is error, and where there
are serious breaches of basic care, I
think we need to
be calling people out on it.
Own up to the fact that there
are difficulties
in Scripture, maybe even some
errors, but with some careful
thought and peaceful discussions, solutions can
be found.)
and bart shouldn't even
be included because of his disingenuous book about the variants of the BIble... (he never really gets down to the explicit details of what they
are... thus misleading people into
thinking the Bible
is full of
errors - for example... a verse may say «Jesus said to give all your possessions» whereas a VARIANT says «And HE says, give all your possesssions») an extremely low number of variants
in the Bibel even change a thing...
I
think your
error is in assuming that making that distinction will help.
Always needing to
be right, always needing to
be in charge and control, always too busy and self - centered for others and always trying to figure out ways that you can profit from God, the Bible, church and religion tells me who you
are,
in which case I care not what you
think about what the Bible says, whether or not it
is without
error and so on.
I appreciate your apparent openess to discussion and the ability to recognize a superior literary intellect:) I also consider myself to
be open to divergent
thought and conversation, and would like to
think I
'm capable of change when my views
are in error.
(2) The
error in their
thinking which had seemed to justify this sectarian practice
was an egregious misconception of the meaning of baptism.»
The basic
error Joseph Bottum makes
is in thinking that there
is no level of justice between an entirely temporal punishment and a punishment that fully and perfectly satisfies the universal demand for justice built into the fabric of existence itself.
Tertullian
was quite typical
in thinking that the philosophers borrowed from Moses but mixed truth with
error.
Thus it
is understood that the men who hold religious positions
in Islam, such as the Caliph or Imam, have no monopoly on
thinking and understanding, nor
are they immune from making
errors, nor do they receive revelation or special inspiration.
I too like the
think of our existence
in a computer - type model, and
being a programmer, I can tell you it
's neccessary to set the attributes of every possible interaction, as any unexpected collision will result
in a fatal
error.
To
think in an agony of remorse of all one has done wrong, whether with sinful intention or
errors of judgment, and to
be inwardly upset over the good works one meant to get done and failed to do,
is a poor frame of mind
in which to try to go to sleep.
I also tend to believe that with lots of study,
thinking, and research, most «
errors»
in the Bible
are actually due to our failure to understand what
was written.
If you
think he has made a fallacy (
error in logic), then tell us which fallacy you
think it
is, and what statement contains it.
I
think that the assumptions that certain segments of the Christian community makes that justifies the use of these methods
are in error.
If there aren't any
in this topic, what makes you
think that people will believe there
were errors in the past?
Some points on some doctrinal statements must
be wrong, and we must not
be so arrogant to
think that our chosen doctrinal statement
is 100 % accurate, while everybody else
is in error.
Some things
are true whether you choose to believe
in them or not, and post modern
thinking is most
in error when it comes to matters of faith.
The
error is not
in the «printing» the
error is clearly
in his
thinking.
To say that the claims that
are based off of a book
were created after the book
was first written
is just stupid (maybe your argument isn't what you typed and you made an
error in trying to convey your
thoughts).
We should not avoid asking ourselves the painfully obvious question: Do we now
think that the judgment at Nuremberg
was in error?
I did not realize that as a practicing Roman Catholic I
was in error by supposing that our Lord
was wrong when he taught us that harboring lustful
thoughts and intentions (now celebrated
in popular culture)
is a sin.
Nevertheless, he
thinks that I fall into a «new
error» when I «emphasize the continuity of Old and New Testaments» and fail to recognize that «the Mosaic Covenant
is abolished
in the New Testament.»
I believe people
in the US
are confusing the violence that
is epidemic
in certain middle - eastern cultures as
being a part of the Islamic religion which
is think is an
error.
Sorry my friend i
'm at work and busy, you see i have to work to make a living and i may make some typing
errors and i don't
think i
'm in a school classes right now.
Two
errors must
be avoided
in thinking about the problem of moral disagreement and pluralism.
It should
be possible to restate the Christian hope for God's work with man
in history from this new perspective without falling into the
errors of those who allowed process to become too simply identified with progress.25 But before we come to our constructive statement, it
is necessary to examine the alternative treatment of this problem
in neoorthodox
thought today.
There
is in this age of science, besides the
error, a vast amount of misdirected truth awaiting synthesis within the authentic
thought in philosophy and
in theology of the Catholic Church.
Some
think it
is their duty to correct the pope,
in the most deferential and respectful words they can find; some address the
errors head - on, but feel it
is only cardinals who have the right to correct the Holy Father directly.
Judging before obtaining all facts invariably results
in error, especially when malicious organizations and people
are interested
in having you embrace their position — just
think of all the zealots killing each other.
It
is a serious
error (and an uncharitable one) to assume that those of us who belong to the Intelligent Design movement
think that our belief
in God depends on evidence for design.
Russian religious
thought of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries
was also very sensitive about the crisis of classical philosophy; quite strong
in the criticism of its
errors, but aspiring to work out its own organic vision of the world, it
was not inclined to unite science with philosophy and theology.
I
think we know there
are scribal
errors in this bible of ours (no doubt from me)-- but I
am yet to find a scribal
error that changes the character of Jesus from what he claims to
be to someone altogether different (ie: not the son of David or from Nazareth or hates Gentiles, etc) or changes his teachings from one thing to another (ie: we don't catch him stoning someone
in adultery anywhere or cursing the roman guards for crucifying him).