Sentences with phrase «thinking is in error»

Where I believe your thinking is in error is that you judge what the EU will do by your * own * priorities, which very obviously does NOT include climate change.
So I think it is in error to try and apply the supposed goal of world wide and absolute peace onto the concept of religion, when no religion has set out to achieve that goal.
I think that is in error but you can't or won't see that.
Though I think it's in error to say that Jesus would be either a Dem or Repub... I think he would be for the concept of the people as a unit having health care that is assisted by the majority of a nation.
If we decide to do this, we will re-credit your account within ten (10) business days for the amount you think is in error, so that you will have the use of the money during the time it takes us to complete our investigation.
What part of that do you think is in error?
He doesn't just say that he thinks it is in error.
If you think I am in error, please quote exactly the words with which you disagree, and provide some facts to support yourself.

Not exact matches

But after she went to bed, Snyder figured it out: «I woke up in the middle of the night thinking what that error was... I came in, made a special trip on the early train that morning to look at a certain wire.»
«That's a rounding error in Texas» budget,» said economist Frederick Floss, executive director of the Fiscal Policy Institute, a New York - based think tank that has researched the issue of immigration and state economics.
In fact the NY Fed manufacturing figure was so bad, many initially thought it was an error.
I think it is difficult to know where the next crisis will come from, and, in general, it is better to have a system that is safe from errors in judgment and surprise than it is to try and avoid errors in judgment and surprises because as along as you are dealing with human beings, there will be errors and surprises.
HASTINGS: Well, the mistakes in Pure was that every time we had a significant error — sales call didn't go well, bug in the code — we tried to think about it in terms of, what process could we put in place to ensure that this doesn't happen again, and thereby improving the company?
I think there's an error in the accounting identies (chapter 2).
No doubt many of you sharp - eyed readers will have spotted a spelling error, thinking I intended to refer to one of these: But, in fact, I really did have in mind something more like this: We are following an example from the recently published Mathematica Beyond Mathematics by Jose Sanchez Leon, an up - to - date text that...
As was expected in that case, there was a simple coding error on the part of Parity and as they were requesting a hard fork many were thinking back to the precedent that was set from the DAO rescue.
@Chuckles I was not being hostile, but am just trying to point out that you are basically willing to conflate any similar cognitive errors such as we have as humans as being significant in any way in religious terms, should it happen that we encounter some alien species that also has idiots who think imaginary stuff is real.
Highlighting the importance of the Church in not shying away from politics Rev O'Donoghue said: «Where there is wickedness, and where there is error, and where there are serious breaches of basic care, I think we need to be calling people out on it.
Own up to the fact that there are difficulties in Scripture, maybe even some errors, but with some careful thought and peaceful discussions, solutions can be found.)
and bart shouldn't even be included because of his disingenuous book about the variants of the BIble... (he never really gets down to the explicit details of what they are... thus misleading people into thinking the Bible is full of errors - for example... a verse may say «Jesus said to give all your possessions» whereas a VARIANT says «And HE says, give all your possesssions») an extremely low number of variants in the Bibel even change a thing...
I think your error is in assuming that making that distinction will help.
Always needing to be right, always needing to be in charge and control, always too busy and self - centered for others and always trying to figure out ways that you can profit from God, the Bible, church and religion tells me who you are, in which case I care not what you think about what the Bible says, whether or not it is without error and so on.
I appreciate your apparent openess to discussion and the ability to recognize a superior literary intellect:) I also consider myself to be open to divergent thought and conversation, and would like to think I'm capable of change when my views are in error.
(2) The error in their thinking which had seemed to justify this sectarian practice was an egregious misconception of the meaning of baptism.»
The basic error Joseph Bottum makes is in thinking that there is no level of justice between an entirely temporal punishment and a punishment that fully and perfectly satisfies the universal demand for justice built into the fabric of existence itself.
Tertullian was quite typical in thinking that the philosophers borrowed from Moses but mixed truth with error.
Thus it is understood that the men who hold religious positions in Islam, such as the Caliph or Imam, have no monopoly on thinking and understanding, nor are they immune from making errors, nor do they receive revelation or special inspiration.
I too like the think of our existence in a computer - type model, and being a programmer, I can tell you it's neccessary to set the attributes of every possible interaction, as any unexpected collision will result in a fatal error.
To think in an agony of remorse of all one has done wrong, whether with sinful intention or errors of judgment, and to be inwardly upset over the good works one meant to get done and failed to do, is a poor frame of mind in which to try to go to sleep.
I also tend to believe that with lots of study, thinking, and research, most «errors» in the Bible are actually due to our failure to understand what was written.
If you think he has made a fallacy (error in logic), then tell us which fallacy you think it is, and what statement contains it.
I think that the assumptions that certain segments of the Christian community makes that justifies the use of these methods are in error.
If there aren't any in this topic, what makes you think that people will believe there were errors in the past?
Some points on some doctrinal statements must be wrong, and we must not be so arrogant to think that our chosen doctrinal statement is 100 % accurate, while everybody else is in error.
Some things are true whether you choose to believe in them or not, and post modern thinking is most in error when it comes to matters of faith.
The error is not in the «printing» the error is clearly in his thinking.
To say that the claims that are based off of a book were created after the book was first written is just stupid (maybe your argument isn't what you typed and you made an error in trying to convey your thoughts).
We should not avoid asking ourselves the painfully obvious question: Do we now think that the judgment at Nuremberg was in error?
I did not realize that as a practicing Roman Catholic I was in error by supposing that our Lord was wrong when he taught us that harboring lustful thoughts and intentions (now celebrated in popular culture) is a sin.
Nevertheless, he thinks that I fall into a «new error» when I «emphasize the continuity of Old and New Testaments» and fail to recognize that «the Mosaic Covenant is abolished in the New Testament.»
I believe people in the US are confusing the violence that is epidemic in certain middle - eastern cultures as being a part of the Islamic religion which is think is an error.
Sorry my friend i'm at work and busy, you see i have to work to make a living and i may make some typing errors and i don't think i'm in a school classes right now.
Two errors must be avoided in thinking about the problem of moral disagreement and pluralism.
It should be possible to restate the Christian hope for God's work with man in history from this new perspective without falling into the errors of those who allowed process to become too simply identified with progress.25 But before we come to our constructive statement, it is necessary to examine the alternative treatment of this problem in neoorthodox thought today.
There is in this age of science, besides the error, a vast amount of misdirected truth awaiting synthesis within the authentic thought in philosophy and in theology of the Catholic Church.
Some think it is their duty to correct the pope, in the most deferential and respectful words they can find; some address the errors head - on, but feel it is only cardinals who have the right to correct the Holy Father directly.
Judging before obtaining all facts invariably results in error, especially when malicious organizations and people are interested in having you embrace their position — just think of all the zealots killing each other.
It is a serious error (and an uncharitable one) to assume that those of us who belong to the Intelligent Design movement think that our belief in God depends on evidence for design.
Russian religious thought of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries was also very sensitive about the crisis of classical philosophy; quite strong in the criticism of its errors, but aspiring to work out its own organic vision of the world, it was not inclined to unite science with philosophy and theology.
I think we know there are scribal errors in this bible of ours (no doubt from me)-- but I am yet to find a scribal error that changes the character of Jesus from what he claims to be to someone altogether different (ie: not the son of David or from Nazareth or hates Gentiles, etc) or changes his teachings from one thing to another (ie: we don't catch him stoning someone in adultery anywhere or cursing the roman guards for crucifying him).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z