Go ahead, stop
thinking of those polar bears.
I dare you right now to stop
thinking of polar bears.
When most people think about wildlife in a changing climate,
they think of polar bears clinging to melting ice, but even species who have adapted to tropical weather are being impacted by the changes to their environment.
Try to pose for yourself this task: not to
think of a polar bear, and you will see that the cursed thing will come to mind every minute.
If
the thought of a polar bear stranded on a patch of melting sea ice doesn't depress you enough, try this video on for
Not exact matches
But Rogers, a senior fellow at lefty U.S.
think - tank Demos and contributor to The New York Times Magazine and The Nation, spends most
of her page count debunking the notion consumer - end market decisions are going to save the
polar bears, or the planet.
An ambitious study
of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in Alaska has found that their overall metabolic rate is 1.6 times greater than
thought, says wildlife...
«When we
think of climate change having an impact on a mammal species, what comes to mind most immediately is an Arctic animal like the
polar bear, which depends on sea ice to survive,» Helgen said.
The 18 July suspension
of government researcher Charles Monnett, originally
thought to have been triggered by questions about his 2006 study
of drowned
polar bears (see background), actually relates to Monnett's management
of $ 50 million in research contracts.
POLAR bears have patrolled the planet's icy regions for millions
of years longer than previously
thought — riding out several episodes
of global warming in that time.
I don't
think the public views
polar bears the same way as most other endangered species and this is one
of the reasons that we laid out some
of the options.
Say, I've been
thinking about this gobble warming thing, and after seeing some footage
of a
polar bear swimming, I
think the theory may be true after all.
I don't
think there is much in this that changes my view
of what
polar bears have done and what the future holds for the species.
[April 20, 7:22 a.m. Insert I
think this work bolsters the view
of scientists who've been calling for a conservation strategy for
polar bears and other ice - dependent species focused on areas
of the Arctic where sea ice is projected to endure well into this greenhouse - heated era.
Their data also indicate that the point when it was previously
thought that the
polar bear line started may have been one
of possibly multiple hybridization events with grizzly
bears instead.
There's been a lot
of discussion
of the fate
of the
polar bear in a warming climate so I
thought it worth adding a few more insights from scientists studying this remarkable animal's past and assessing its future.
Although in the end, it may be that recommendations for
polar bear refugia may overshadow the distributions
of other resources, I
think that moving ahead with strong recommendations, without at least considering the distributions
of other competing resources (and, by the way the concerns
of local people who may live in the areas), is a bit like getting the cart ahead
of the horse.
Later today, I'll add a long string
of thoughts on
polar bears and climate change that I've received in recent days for a variety
of scientists.
I do know a number
of registered republicans who are seriously ticked off at her legal action regarding
polar bears, but I don't
think that's what Palin meant in the interview.
If we
think of environmental issues that way instead
of polar bears in the Artic and rainforests around the tropics, then there are a number
of advantages to that.
I
think that
polar bear will extinct soon not untill the end
of this centory because our human being.
Since I'm not one
of those who believes testing it is worth lifting a finger for, I'm not really the one to provide it, but I note that the world is not short
of those who
think otherwise, and who can be relied upon to supply all manner
of metrication with their catastrophic alternative hypotheses —
polar bears melting, ice - caps dying out, models that project soaring temperatures — you know the sort
of thing.
Crockford has published «briefings» on conservative
think tanks and has been described as a
polar bear expert, but uses a «scientific uncertainty» and «public accountability
of science» framework to criticize scientists» findings.
Ultimately though, we know less than we
think we do about what actually drives conflicts between
polar bears and people and since we're rapidly running out
of luck in a warming Arctic, this knowledge gap urgently needs to be closed.
Max, we can show that Mann's work is garbage, Rahmstorf's «worse than we
thought» relied on pretend data, Monnett's
polar bear study is beyond stupid methodology, Briffa's magic tree, Jones» fake Chinese data, the SST wild ass guesses, the Steig Antarctic smear, the «quality» underlying Harry's Read Me, the repeated refusal by the hockey team to share data or engage in any transparency, and the underlying fraud
of Climategate.
We
think of it as physically distant — involving
polar bears, or small island nations we've never visited.
You [and many more] really
think you've found the holy grail with this one don't you BilB, the rational to tax and command every human for the original sin
of living on the planet, especially all those neo fascist luddite racist sexist misogynist bodgy capitalists who do all those things and give you all that stuff only to expect payment for it when the government should take it and give them to you free; you can finally bring the commanding heights
of the world's industry and agriculture and lifestyle under the infallible control
of an inter government body and everyone who is permitted will be in his permitted place doing his permitted thing and all will be as it should be and the planet will be safe for the
polar bears and the spirogyra.
It seems very odd to me that Pagano and colleagues suggested no reasons for the unexpectedly poor showing
of polar bear hunting success during their study except a bit
of hand - waving about higher - than - we -
thought metabolic rates in the
bears.
Snow depth over sea ice in spring affects the hunting success
of polar bears on ringed seal (Phoca hispida) pups, but the relationship is more complicated than you might
think and there is less data on this phenomenon than you would believe.
Maybe if I was a
polar bear I;d
think different... but there are only ~ 25,000
of them living in a very narrow ecorange.
(Well, good if you
think having lots
of extra
polar bears is good.
First, the non-ironic reason: Lomborg starts his book with a chapter on
polar bears, presumably because he
thinks it's one
of his strongest arguments — it isn't.
It has, they haven't because the
polar bear biology was wrong is an example
of the type
of attack I
think most effective.
goodbye
polar bears, forests
of BC, cod, birds, didn't mean to poison you we
thought it was a good idea at the time please come back we've got digital cameras!
While Dezeen stuck to the PR release, Inhabitots
thought it was «a great conversation piece» for a child's room, GreenUpgrader described it as «a creative reminder
of the
polar bears plight», but Green Daily found the rug qualified as «depressing decor» that «evokes images
of the apocalypse».
So, to justify why he
thought the # 4.4 billion spent on the LHC would have been better spent on climate change, Sir David King, former Chief Scientific Advisor to the UK Government, current president
of the British Association for the Advancement
of Science, and author
of books about climate change that have pictures
of polar bears on the cover, has little choice but to resort to hyperbole and extravagation: