A big «hole» appeared in August in the ice pack in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas, north of Alaska, when
thinner seasonal ice surrounded by thicker, older ice melted.
The thinner seasonal ice conditions helped reduce the amount of ice, leading to the 2007 record low amount of total Arctic sea ice.
Consequently, a larger than normal amount of
thinner seasonal ice dominated most of the Arctic Ocean, melting faster.
A big «hole» appeared in August in the ice pack in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas, north of Alaska, when
thinner seasonal ice surrounded by thicker, older ice melted.
Not exact matches
It is likely that the primary reason for the large loss of
ice this summer is that the
ice cover has continued to
thin and become more dominated by
seasonal ice.
In both cases we're talking about
seasonal sea
ice floating in a
thin layer on the sea, next to cold and
ice - covered land.
It is particularly important to
seasonal forecasts (such as the SEARCH Sea
Ice Outlook that will be released later this month), because thinner ice is more likely to melt completely during summ
Ice Outlook that will be released later this month), because
thinner ice is more likely to melt completely during summ
ice is more likely to melt completely during summer.
The total area covered by thick older
ice that survives one or more summers («multi-year
ice») shrank 42 percent or 1.54 million square kilometers (595,000 square miles), leaving
thinner first - year
ice («
seasonal ice») as the dominant type of
ice in the region.
The Arctic
ice pack is
thinning, and in many years there is also a
seasonal hole in the ozone layer.
Overall, the curve shown in Figure 4 is commensurate with the notion that a
thinner arctic
ice cover that is more mobile can lead to greater
seasonal and interannual variability, with a potential loss in predictability.
Since
seasonal ice is
thinner than multiyear
ice (i.e.,
ice that has survived at least one melt season) and vulnerable to melting completely, there was a possibility that the
ice edge could recede beyond the pole and leaving the pole completely
ice - free.
A number of techniques have been employed to sub-set or recalibrate these projections based on different aspects of the observed
ice cover, including the mean and / or
seasonal cycle of
ice extent (e.g., Stroeve et al., 2007, 2012a; Wang and Overland, 2009, 2012), historical
ice cover trends (Boe et al., 2009), and
ice volume and
thin ice area (Massonnet et al., 2012).