Angelique Gonzales» 14, who worked with Denniston on the research and is
third author on the paper, examined nearly 11 meters of stalagmites, measuring them in half millimeter increments and recording the location and thickness of mud layers.
Not exact matches
Today, I had the great fortune of working a little
on three different scientific
papers on which I'm a coauthor, one first -
authored by another professor, another by a postdoctoral fellow, and the
third by a PhD student — two helping provide the knowledge needed to constrain sea - level rise, and
third helping reconstruct the history of climate.
«More than two -
thirds of all
authors of chapter 9 of the IPCC's 2007 climate - science assessment are part of a clique whose members have co-authored
papers with each other... the majority of scientists who are skeptical of a human influence
on climate significant enough to be damaging to the planet were unrepresented in the authorship of chapter 9.»
However, according to the
author self - ratings, nearly two -
thirds of the
papers in our survey do express a position
on the subject somewhere in the
paper.
It is of no little significance that the IPCC's value for the coefficient in the CO2 forcing equation depends
on only one
paper in the literature; that its values for the feedbacks that it believes account for two -
thirds of humankind's effect
on global temperatures are likewise taken from only one
paper; and that its implicit value of the crucial parameter κ depends upon only two
papers, one of which had been written by a lead
author of the chapter in question, and neither of which provides any theoretical or empirical justification for a value as high as that which the IPCC adopted.
Elsewhere, Lightning white
paper author Tadge Dryja gave a talk
on Discreet Log Contracts, work that hints at how so - called oracles, or
third - party data providers, could operate within Lightning Networks, settling conditional payments between users such as might be wanted for insurance payments or casual betting.