Sentences with phrase «though does of course»

It actually tastes pretty good, though does of course still taste like protein powder.

His words of praise to Jesus (3:2) should not be dismissed as pious flattery, though they do of course fall far short of Jesus» true meaning.

That is thankfully not the case with Infinity War as the film feels pretty balanced between the various groupings of Avengers, though some do of course get a bit more screentime than others.

The 1940 peak in GISS appears to be near «normal» though you do of course have the aerosol issues.

So I don't have any of the southern Hemispheres table any more, though I do of course have all of the csv files.

Not exact matches

Of course, if you're a cord - cutter who doesn't want to pay for a fancy subscription streaming package, there's always an even cheaper, though not quite as fruitful, option: get a digital antenna.

He didn't, of course, and as of presstime it still wasn't out, though the company has released some impressive photos it says were taken with a new beyond - ultra-def chip it has developed.

Of course, even though this information has been checked by medical professionals, Google says it shouldn't be all you do to determine if you have a medical issue.

Of course, these features don't necessarily come cheap, though they're not over-the-top expensive either.

Median, of course, doesn't mean best - in - class, though.

Quality-wise, its holdings are comparable to CPD's though of course, dividends on the U.S. holdings do not receive preferential tax treatment.

The critical issue here is that even though inflation rose and fell over the course of the cycle, price expectations did not move — even when inflation was running at 5 per cent, the community at large expected it would soon be back to its normal lower pace.

«Given XRP's ~ 4000 percent increase over the course of the year, R3 suddenly wants to tap into the value of XRP, though the facts are clear that they did not earn any option based on our agreement.»

Those new cards, of course, are attached to the same account that you had with the retailer, meaning that your outstanding balance will survive even though the store didn't.

Dealing with ambiguity at a startup is par for the course, but the benefits of solving the problems that matter most eventually become very clear — though it's often years down the road before they do.

Though they do not receive the four credits from the course, many have enrolled in the Genius of Warren Buffett up to four times.

This is a normal experience in an economic expansion: as economic activity normalises interest rates do the same — though of course it is the interest rates borrowers actually pay, and that savers receive, that are important rather than the cash rate per se.

(Though, of course, I * do * check the girls out * as well *).

Some say marriage is a dissolving institution, just par for the course in this sea of modernity we're swimming in, and still others seem to hold it on an impossibly high pedestal, as though one's life doesn't begin until one's wedding day: when you find your soulmate, your «other half,» you will have found your ultimate fulfillment, the one who will dispel your loneliness forever.

Because God flooded Earth and except Noah and his family in what is clearly not a sea - bearing boat, killed everyone, including «innocent» babies (which of course begs to question the whole idea about the Bible being against abortion and all even though it doesn't explicitly say anything against abortion though the method for aborting fetuses, e.g., forced miscarriage, already existed in those days.

«The Saviour, of course,» says one, «does not mean that he who desires to follow Him must hate his parents... but... if loyalty to Him clashes with loyalty to them he is to treat his loved ones in this connection as though they are persons whom he hates.»

To affirm that in this way a necessary, unavoidable, historical process of development on a large scale in the doctrines which are not defined dogma is legitimate and a matter of course, is not to say that this history does not also contain mistakes, over-hasty (though only provisional and revocable) decisions, cases of short - sightedness and lack of understanding.

(They're not, because Nebraska does not recognize same - sex marriage, though of course in all likelihood the courts will put an end to that in fairly short order.)

Once the shock wore off though, I realized that money abuses and issues, while endemic within churches, still only account for a portion of the many ways in which churches have wounded people and thus there is undoubtedly plenty of people in search of a safe place who do not have any of the same issues that I have with linking money and spirituality, so really you were only excluding a certain portion of people from safety by attaching a price tag to it, those for whom money issues are a sticking point and of course those who simply don't have the extra funds to commit.

For example, even though the laws in the Pentateuch probably emerged gradually over the course of centuries as people sought ways to live in community, what does it mean that these laws became viewed as stemming directly from God at one point in the life of Moses?

As far as I can see thus far, though, they are Muslims with a few added layers of mumbo and jumbo and magic, which doesn't automatically make them evil, of course - just not the truth.

Classical theologians have repeatedly pointed out that creation ex nihilo does not necessarily involve a temporal beginning of the universe; though, of course, many of them believe that in fact there was such a beginning.

The neoclassical position on Group I does not entail the neoclassical position on Group 2, though it is, of course, consistent with it.

Nor, whatever allowance be made for overcoloring in the course of controversy, is it possible to doubt that he did deliberately criticize them, and sometimes in trenchant terms, though we need not assume that all of them were included in such criticism; there were perhaps more teachers of the Law with whom Jesus could find himself in friendly agreement than the two or three who have found their way into the gospels.

I hate Hitler but I really do not attach Christianity and of course I would never dare attack Jesus (PBUH) because he is our Prophet (not God though) So why are you attacking Islam?

Though the Ctatholics are definetly wrong there is something very flawed with his logic about pagan stories being bundled together they was huge part of the bible they was in many places the hebrews came and went is it possible pagans knew the story of Abraham and Isaac of course I am sure word spread like wild fire not to mention is how do you know if they are pagan stories or true stories that the pagans decided to tell sounds to me like he just doesn't want to be held accountable.

I do not think so, though of course it is true that very little has been chosen out of so much.

Of course you don't, even though it is obvious to you.

If change really involves self - transcendence even, in certain circumstances, to a new essence, even though only in virtue of the dynamism of absolute Being, which of course does not, let it be repeated, alter the fact that it is a question of self - transcendence; if matter and spirit are not simply disparate in nature but matter is in a certain way «solidified» spirit, the only significance of which is to serve to make actual spirit possible, then an evolutionary development of matter towards spirit is not an inconceivable idea.15 If there exists at all by virtue of the motion of absolute Being, a change in the material order whereby this rises above itself, then this self - transcendence can only occur in the direction of spirit, because the absolute Being is spirit.

Whether something of the sort may be supposed to occur in the organic realm does not solely depend on whether in the organic (sub-human) sphere, substantial formal principles essentially higher than the principles constitutive of inorganic reality can strictly be postulated by natural philosophy, in the way claimed by Vitalism rightly understood, as entelechies of sorts, though of course in themselves these could not be the objects of perception, because a posteriori and experimentally it is only complete beings which are met with, never principles of being as such.

Ignoring rape damages men as well, not just because men also get raped (though of course they do) but because women who are raped are someone's daughter, sister, wife or friend, and their pain is going to hurt the people who love them too.

Of course you don't concede the existence of God, even though it is obvious to yoOf course you don't concede the existence of God, even though it is obvious to yoof God, even though it is obvious to you.

We don't get to choose how our stories begin, and though we row tirelessly forward in an effort to determine the course of our life's story, still there is that past, always tethering us to our first breath.»

I don't believe the government has the right to end lives any more than a murderer does, though, of course, I find exceptions in each of these (life of mother for abortion, a police officer defending herself, etc.).

Of course, with humans, even though we decide things, that does not guarantee that it will happen, because we are not in control of everythinOf course, with humans, even though we decide things, that does not guarantee that it will happen, because we are not in control of everythinof everything.

(Though I end up having to explain in the South frequently that we mean «one universal Church comprised of all who call Jesus Lord,» which of course includes Catholics but does not refer to the Roman Catholic Church explicitly.)

It does not matter if we say Gott in German or Deus in Latin, or El in the Semitic languages or teotl in Mexican and so forth, though it is, of course, a very obscure and difficult question how we can know that all these different words mean the same thing or person, for in this case we can not simply point to a common experience of what is meant, independent of the term.

Of course Torah... there are plenty of verses in Koran talks about Torah and Injeel... both Torah and Injeel were having the name of the prophet and the koran to come if you see in 3:70 and they knew it both the Jews and Christians... but after the revelation of Koran some of them believed and most of them did not and we have people till today that they do not believe even though their history tells the truth.Of course Torah... there are plenty of verses in Koran talks about Torah and Injeel... both Torah and Injeel were having the name of the prophet and the koran to come if you see in 3:70 and they knew it both the Jews and Christians... but after the revelation of Koran some of them believed and most of them did not and we have people till today that they do not believe even though their history tells the truth.of verses in Koran talks about Torah and Injeel... both Torah and Injeel were having the name of the prophet and the koran to come if you see in 3:70 and they knew it both the Jews and Christians... but after the revelation of Koran some of them believed and most of them did not and we have people till today that they do not believe even though their history tells the truth.of the prophet and the koran to come if you see in 3:70 and they knew it both the Jews and Christians... but after the revelation of Koran some of them believed and most of them did not and we have people till today that they do not believe even though their history tells the truth.of Koran some of them believed and most of them did not and we have people till today that they do not believe even though their history tells the truth.of them believed and most of them did not and we have people till today that they do not believe even though their history tells the truth.of them did not and we have people till today that they do not believe even though their history tells the truth...

A very great deal of that has been done, though, of course, there is always more to do.

There is, of course, an undertow to this story, which has to do with that word «conservative»; in some Catholic papers, though not, these days, The Catholic Herald, it has been over recent years almost a term of abuse.

Of course, that does not mean this was a «wrong» call though.

Hartshorne will have nothing to do with this abstractly negative God, and it is one of the achievements of his philosophy continually to have pointed out the implications of classical theism (even though, of course, classical theists would wish to resist the drawing of some of them).

For the purpose of this descriptive task he is concerned, in the first instance, with the impact which these writings make on himself, and not primarily with the first aim of exegesis, which is the detailed analysis of the meaning and intention of the original writers; though this does not of course mean that his individual understanding and evaluation can dispense with scholarship.

There is no necessity that evolution take one and only one course.2 What does seem quite possible, though, is that the cosmos would still have embarked upon a course of complexification.

Begetter in this case does not mean in a sexual sense, though of course God created sexual union as well as everything else.