Not exact matches
The international team of researchers
led by Barry Sinervo of the University of California, Santa Cruz, found that even
though their habitats remained intact, the population of one group of lizards in Mexico has shrunk by 12 per cent since 1975 due to
climate change.
The country isn't getting behind on efforts to
change that status,
though, as it's now
leading the fight against
climate change.
A good first sentence in support of the scientific evidence on
climate change —
though leading off with «I know that there are those who disagree» with overwhelming evidence was not good.
The claim that science has shown that «
climate change is real and is happening»
leads to an array of political arguments from environmentalists, as
though all that need be shown to legitimise drastic action (the more drastic the better) is that mankind has influenced the
climate.
Because the earth (mother earth, or Gaia, to all you tree hugger freaks) knows what we want, and what is best for us, and what is best is our nice Goldilocks
climate that supports the inviolate and constitutionally protected right to cheap, atmosphere
changing fossil fuels even
though said usage essentially reverses 10s of millions of years of earth lower atmosphere affecting energy balances within a mere speck of time) and not you eco fools who want to harm the poor (something
climate change would never do, bill gates and the world's
leading scientists and thinkers and economists are fools to even think it —
climate change will affect the wealthy) just to give the even more power over our individual lives.
This is currently the
leading cause of global
climate change even
though there is always natural factors as well such as volcanic processes and solar activity, but not at the rate of
climate change we have seen the last century.
Though still, if the LLNL says aggressive development could
lead to commercial fusion by 2030, I wouldn't be pinning any
climate change / carbon emission reduction plans on it...
Though some of this may be recap for avid TreeHugger readers, it's worth repeating: Stephen Chu Appointment a Good Sign Beyond his stated commitment to dealing with
climate change during the campaign, Pearce indicates that the appointment of Stephen Chu as energy secretary is the real sign that the US could soon
lead the renewable energy /
climate change race.
... But Sea Level Rise Will Still Take It Away It's too bad
though that, according to the
lead author of the IPCC
climate change report, Dr Atiq Rahman, this new land will still be inundated by rising sea levels caused by
climate change.
And
though the panelists never really delved deeply into the issue of how women's empowerment could combat
climate change, that this was the case was mentioned throughout (perhaps since education acts as a population control, and
leads to better decision making abilities in general).