Not exact matches
I can understand people wanting
proof of bin Laden's
death, but I
think his followers who will portray him as a martyr will be
proof that bin Laden lives no longer.
The point I am making is that in whatever sense he believes the universe will no longer exist FOR HIM upon his
death, he has no
proof that this in fact is true, So even if he
thinks the universe will continue to exist after his
death, but because he will be dead he will not be able to perceive its existence.
Of course, I'm not afraid of
death, and I'm okay with the
thought that my life will end and I will be forgotten eventually, so maybe I don't have any reason to believe in something for which there is no
proof.
On the occasion of the 900th anniversary of the
death of St Anselm of Aosta and Canterbury Sandro Magister has made the epistemologically realist and relational point that, contrary to some prominent abstract interpretations, Anselm's «Ontological
Proof of God primarily shows that «those who deny the existence of «that than which no greater can be
thought» trap themselves in an insurmountable contradiction, cutting off the possibility of all
thought.»
Planet Terror's not nearly as smart as it
thinks it is;
Death Proof's smarts are so edged and complicated that they could only be the product, unintentional, of an auteur who's assimilated the undertow of his favourite films and, rarest of the rare, is able to reproduce those undertows in works that, however familiar, are completely original.
I don't
think you can make The Artist as a «regular» film, and I don't
think it's any more of a gimmick than
Death Proof, Machete, Hobo...
The bargain is more than worthwhile — an hour of dead space is a fair price for the two hours of anarchic brilliance surrounding it — but it breaks the heart to
think of how much higher it could have soared if
Death Proof had found a better rhythm earlier.