When the competition launched two years ago, most
thought of carbon capture only in the context of enhanced oil recovery.
Not exact matches
The fact that the funding model has been agreed upon is great news, since although I have been critical
of Alberta's
carbon capture and storage strategy in the past, I
think that these pilots provide a crucial opportunity for technological advancement.
Armed with new Department
of Energy money, a Connecticut company announced this week it is moving forward with a
carbon capture project that it
thinks could revolutionize the technology.
While some experts
think these solutions are impractical for wide - scale use, others say there is a need for additional tests
capturing carbon dioxide from cement, one
of the highest - emitting industries.
Scientists previously
thought it wasn't possible to
capture and store
carbon this way because earlier studies suggested it could take thousands
of years for large amounts
of carbon dioxide to be converted to chalk.
«I
think it's better to turn CO2 into something useful,» Yu said, comparing the approach to other methods
of carbon capture.
Once the nation is committed to action, the government and private sector could concentrate their
thinking on whether very large - scale infrastructure investments would need to be supported with public funds ---- projects such as solarization
of the grid, new coal power plants with
carbon capture and sequestration, etc..
I still
think this 2010 paper by Howard J. Herzog at the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology very nicely lays out what to look for to gauge if countries are serious about this issue: «Scaling up
carbon dioxide
capture and storage: From megatons to gigatons.»
I
think the analysis that best
captures this effect is the one done by Larry Cathles (see here and here), which concludes that even with 1 percent leakage, on the centennial time scale switching to natural gas gives you 40 percent
of the benefit
of switching to entirely
carbon - free energy.
The
Carbon Capture Journal's issue on carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) has a number of interesting articles on how countries and companies across the world are thinking about opportunities fo
Capture Journal's issue on
carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) has a number of interesting articles on how countries and companies across the world are thinking about opportunities fo
capture utilization and storage (CCUS) has a number
of interesting articles on how countries and companies across the world are
thinking about opportunities for CCUS.
If you run a research laboratory and the government offers you a large sum
of money to study
carbon capture (say) do you turn the money down if you
think the concept is not feasible?
«At the end
of the day, I
think that the price
of air
capture will determine the price
of carbon.
«I
think everyone understands that we need to develop and expand this technology,» said Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D - N.D.), one
of the sponsors
of the bill, which supports
carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS).
One questioner suggested that biomass was not a particularly good way
of removing
carbon from the atmosphere, as growing trees usually takes too long for it to be effective, although other participants
thought that fast growing trees were a good way
of capturing carbon.
By 2050 the IEA
thinks we need a CCS industry capable
of capturing 7,000 million tonnes
of carbon dioxide per year and storing it underground.
When two European utilities pulled out
of the Rotterdam Warehousing and
Capture Demonstration Project (ROAD) on June 27, many proponents thought the carbon capture and storage (CCS) dream was dead in
Capture Demonstration Project (ROAD) on June 27, many proponents
thought the
carbon capture and storage (CCS) dream was dead in
capture and storage (CCS) dream was dead in Europe.
At around US$ 600 per tonne, Climeworks» system isn't an inexpensive way
of reducing CO2 in the atmosphere, and this is the key factor that makes critics
think carbon capture might be more
of an illusion than a realistic strategy to fight climate change.
... some researchers
think that by seeding the ocean with iron, we can
capture large amounts
of carbon dioxide gas from the atmosphere.
I'll just direct readers to the TreeHugger archives on why we
think there's no such thing as clean coal, and why
carbon capture and storage can't be relied upon to allow us to keep using even a small percentage
of the amount
of fossil fuels we continue to burn: