Former infantry officers in the U.S. Marine Corps, Haft and Suarez first
thought of the idea because, «What's more American than Coca - Cola?»
Jean says
she thought of the idea because her living room doubles as her home office, and she wanted to be able to transform the space quickly.
Not exact matches
The danger is focusing on an
idea that's too much
of a personal hobby, they say,
because there's too much
of a selection bias to make you
think it's something important, or worth doing.
«I was just lying on the bed
thinking and came up with all this bizarre imagery... I
think also the
idea that
because I was in a foreign city by myself and I felt very dissociated from humanity in general, it was very easy to project myself into these two characters from the future who were out
of sync, out
of time, out
of place.»
So without putting too fine
of a point on it, Buffett's basic
idea is that you shouldn't skip out on doing something today
because you
think you'll be able to do it better in the future.
Whether it's a sense
of obligation or
because you
think it's a good
idea in the moment, an impulsive yes often leads to big problems.
I
think they come to me
because they respect me and they respect my
ideas, so if I do suggest an alternative, most
of the time they will actually go with that.
«You get affected by things that happen around the world or whatever, a lot more I
think as a father, just
because you realize how precious life is, and it puts it all in perspective, you know, the
idea of not being around to see your children grow up,» he added.
«I don't
think it is a great
idea to get into all
of this (allegations
of White House interference)
because every deal raises different facts,» said Andre Barlow
of Doyle, Barlow & Mazard.
There's also a third route:
think of an
idea that is rooted in a perspective that everyone else is missing
because they don't see the potential today.
More than 40 percent
of startups fail simply
because nobody in the real world was interested in buying what the founder
thought was a good
idea.
«
Because they've worked at a variety
of companies, they may bring fresh
ideas and perspectives your company hasn't
thought of before.»
I laugh
because I
think we have stereotypical images
of explorers wearing khakis, and I love that I am shaking up that old
idea.
Walden took interest in proposing legislation to ban the option
because he
thought the
idea of minting a platinum coin to work around the debt ceiling was a particularly absurd
idea that exemplified «the problem
of people in Washington not understanding the reality»
of the national debt.
Maybe that's
because speaking at a measured pace is also a sign
of confidence: You aren't rushing your words
because you're secure in the value
of your
ideas, your opinions, and your
thoughts.
They get paid a lot
because there is an extraordinary amount
of pressure on them, and I
think to take that auteur - style theory
of directorship — that
idea that they're just clay in my hands — is kind
of simplistic.
The key lies in understanding one basic
idea: although we tend to
think of things as stable
because that makes them easier to grasp, every situation that ever arises actually results from interactions between sets
of constantly shifting, interweaving worlds.
We like the
idea of a yogurt Frappuccino
because it tricks us into
thinking we're ordering something healthy.
Of those who didn't leave, 28 % haven't considered it; 14 % mulled the idea over, but decided to stay; and 17 % have thought about it and are currently looking for a new job because of a lack of flexibilit
Of those who didn't leave, 28 % haven't considered it; 14 % mulled the
idea over, but decided to stay; and 17 % have
thought about it and are currently looking for a new job
because of a lack of flexibilit
of a lack
of flexibilit
of flexibility.
Most new entrepreneurs spend a lot
of time trying to build a business just
because «they»
think is a great
idea.
We
think this combination provides a uniquely well - screened list
of long
ideas because return on invested capital (ROIC) is the primary driver
of shareholder value creation.
It seemed like The Eiffel Tower or Paris» finest restaurants werent enough to distract them from a brilliant
idea trapped under the grey clouds,
because next thing you know, these two «uber» kids were already brainstorming,
thinking about ways to solve this global issue
of finding cars at the right place, on the right time.
He said he contributed $ 10,000 to Nimble America
because he's «committed to the principles
of fair play and equal treatment» and «
thought the organization had fresh
ideas on how to communicate with young voters through the use
of several billboards.»
«Here's more background: I contributed $ 10,000 to Nimble America
because I
thought the organization had fresh
ideas on how to communicate with young voters through the use
of several billboards,» he continued.
The reason is
because most entrepreneurs develop business
ideas or products based on what they
think the market need; instead
of what the market actually needs.
Instead, they would have bought
because they like the
idea of BitGold, oblivious to the fact that a good business can be a bad investment at the wrong price, or
because they
think that someone else will be dumb enough to pay an even higher price in the future.
Lewis: Yeah, I
think the
idea of diversifying is something that most investors are familiar with, but I
think it's probably even more important with these types
of investments,
because of the risk profile with some
of them.
And then we don't want to give up any
ideas that we have
thought about
because of the time we've invested — and the promise
of what could be.
It's also about for - lack -
of - any - real - news stirring up the deal pot, just
because some Wall Street types
think it is a good
idea to mash the two companies together in a new configuration that might or might not make sense.
So rather than pontificate about where equities are headed next, primarily
because I have no
idea (and neither does anyone else), I
thought I'd simply let a number
of charts do the talking.
The world is simply just so big that we may have come up with an
idea on our own and
because of that
think it is one -
of - a-kind but in reality might already exist.
Why does the same science that rejects or supposedly debunks religion
because of the preposterous
idea of an almighty, all - knowing, always present creator, yet licks their lips at the
thought of an ultra intelligent extra terrestrial with the capability to answer question break the laws
of nature, have mind reading capabilities, so on and so forth?
No, I'm an old woman who had to move a family
because of former christian «friends» who «loved me» so much that when I told them I no longer believed
thought it was a fun
idea to take away my job, vandalize my vehicles, and harass me until I had to move to a new town..
when your mother / sister / cousin / daughter gets r / a / p / ed by some ass, remember you want her to give birth to that child
because «GOD» made that baby and don't expect a dime from the governement to help with that «love child» seeing you want the governement to «stay out
of your life»... but it's ok if they mess with everyone else based on your
idea of «GOD» and what you
think is right and just in fairy land.
You really love the
idea of other people burning for eternity
because they don't
think like you.
They're impatient with the
idea of entitlement REFORM — mending, not ending, the key features
of our minimalist safety net —
because they
think we live in REVOLUTIONARY times with high constitutional significance.
I never heard
of the
idea that christianity grew
because of persecution so I
think that is kind
of a strawman.
Chris: Darwin was fearful
of his big
idea because he still believed in the existence
of the Christian god, and was extremely uncomfortable coming up with something that went against a literal interpretation
of the creation story (I
think.
Last time I proffered the
idea that pain is a problem for the atheist
because he has to figure out what to do about said pain - and some
of you took that at face value, but I
think some
of you are rightfully scratching your heads.
Perhaps god doesn't like a bunch
of mindless sheeple, and lets in only people who
think for themselves and live honest and compassionate lives
because they
think it's a good
idea, not
because they fear eternal punishment.
You really need to look up the definition
of statistics
because you have no
idea what that even means, 2nd it's not a statistic it's a fact, in 2600 BCE The book
of the dead was written and on chapter 125 7
of the commandments were written before Christianity was every
thought up.
Since no one has yet to SEE an atom, the
idea of the structure
of the atom can only be inferred by experimental evidence — yet I see no Republican trying to stop teaching the structure
of the atom in school — oh that's right, its
because major corporations and industries rely on this science (pharm, weapons manufacturers etc etc) whereas the theory
of evolution is merely
think piece
of scientists on how life on Earth changes over time.
Hierarchical
thinking and action, says Mary Louise Pratt, is «historically as well as morally distortive»
because it divides everything into privileged and unprivileged groupings, condemning some
ideas, texts, and persons to the margins
of a culture while exalting others to positions
of primacy.
William Lad Sessions, who summarized and analyzed Hartshorne's doctoral work writes: «The concepts, or «
ideas»
of philosophy, Hartshorne insists, are communicable (or «transferable» to use his term which points to the experiential basis
of conception) but only partially so,
because... obscurity is directly proportional to concreteness, and good philosophy plunges
thought into the concrete....
Romney's comment was perhaps well meant, but taken in the context
of all
of his
ideas about women, that they must be taken care
of because they are fragile, delicate creatures, who can't
think or care for themselves and are better fit for staying home and taking care
of the offspring than out in the work force, the words mirror his general condescending attitude toward women.
Hebrew
thought developed this
idea rather than immortality, first,
because the Hebrews had a vivid sense
of the goodness
of material bodily existence; and second,
because they understood the necessary unity
of the person not as a soul - in - body but as a whole living, feeling,
thinking personality.
I
think its a bad
idea to hug the homeless and things like that
because of germs and disease.
Because the odds
of «dangerous»
ideas espoused by a carpenter walking around, preaching in an occupied land peacefully overtaking the Roman Empire (the most powerful man - made force on the planet at the time) and shaping civilization, Western and beyond, are almost as remote as the odds
of you forgoing your delusional confidence in your ability for rational
thought or facts, giving him credit for being exactly who he said he was.
I
think that your
idea of teaching, with interaction between the one teaching and the people being taught is better suited towards emphasizing that fact than preaching,
because the teacher can then work with the listeners regarding how God can use the truths being taught in each individual believers life.
Jesus is not called the Saviour
because someone somewhere
thought it would be a good
idea to throw in another name in the long list
of religious names out there.