Sentences with phrase «thought only side»

You thought only side bangs look good?

Not exact matches

«I think what we need to do is really to start negotiations and to see how we do this withdrawal; if a transition is needed, making a transition that is not causing economic damage (for either side),» Verhofstadt said, adding that it was only then that both parties should consider their future relationship.

Looking at Sundar's strategy on the Google side of things, I've only seen it grow in the areas we're focused on and thinking about addressing.

So while you think your weak spot might be on the tech - side of things, it's probably not, or it's only the tip of the iceberg.

And that's not only in the US, that's in Europe in particular, certainly in the UK, and it's difficult I think to have a certainty around it but I think our bias is that bonds are on the expensive side at the moment and we are generally in most developed markets running shy of benchmark duration positions.

Only when I began to think for myself and to question what I had been told, did I see that the «other side» had some valid points — I simply didn't want to hear them, much less attempt to understand them.

Change can only come about through agreement, not by kicking people in the back side because we think we have bigger boots.

I think it's gracious of God in His accounts to make it appear that I only denied Christ three times, but when you take all four of the accounts side by side, it becomes clear that I denied him six times.

To me the most ironic of all are the ones who think God wanted a human blood sacrifice, and the only possible way to get on God's good side is to acknowledge that.

While I can not myself question Julie based on my knowledge, I think it is fair to at least point out that there is legal documentation and testimony to support that Julie's side is not the only side of the story.

His stance can be a little too conservative for my taste (mostly on social issues) but he is articulate and has some well thought out plans, not to mention he is pretty moderate and I think in this day and age we need a centrist, someone who isn't afraid to work with both sides of the aisle instead of just playing party politics and only pandering to one half of the country.

The governement however, is not allowed to take sides (i.e. promote one religion over another) so the only reasonable option I can think of is to eliminate it from the sphere of politics completely.

Not only have Christians been on both sides of the fence but we can find the same cleavage in the Enlightenment thought of the founding fathers.

Not because I think he is a good Christian, in fact, given his knowledge of Satan's inner thoughts, he is likely to sit on his (Satan's) right hand side (a.k.a. the anti-Christ) but because if he is nominated, President Obama, the only true Christian amongst those running for the office of the Presidency of the United States in 2012, will win in a landslide.

There seem to be only two kinds of mind left; and — it is a disturbing thought — all natural mystical power and all human religious impulse seem to be concentrated on one side.

This protects you from the «attack» of the Other, you think... but if you ask me, it brings up enough negative energy in you to have a spiritual breakdown, like Job, and to side only with people, who hold to Scripture, blindly - in other words, to side with those who have not learned to trust that thinking for themselves, as individuals, is a good thing.

«Now if one thinks this type of language is too strong, let him only remember that God the Warrior is simply the reverse side of God the Lover or of God the Redeemer... [Love] is power in action in a sinful world.

But that empirical, visible church, located where we happen to live and which we can see functioning well or ill, is only the hither side — the imperfect expression, if you will — of what the New Testament thinks of as the «Body of Christ» and describes as «without spot or blemish,» as «the household of faith,» and as «the family of God.»

The only reason we limit the discussion to the so - called «side A» and «side B» debate is because, as Cindy mentions above, the most you could ever squeeze out of Scripture is a prohibition on same - sex acts (which I still think takes quite a bit of squeezing).

Nicholas Berdyaev the Russian philosopher was most critical of the traditional Christian ethics which confined itself to the ethics of law and ethics of grace and ignored the ethics of creativity, while secular modernity to which Christian modernism succumbed, elevated the human vocation of creativity as supreme and as capable by itself of solving the problem of destructivity within it without the need of grace and even of law in the long run Anthropology got perverted on all sides by converting Creation into an order of static laws which are only to be obeyed and perfected by grace in Catholic thought and by getting validated for collective existence without criticism but to be rejected as totally irrelevant in the realm of existence in grace in Protestant thought.

Not only do the vast majority of teens surveyed think Americans are divided, but they basically embrace the divide: Three in four «already have a party preference,» and only around 25 percent think they have «a lot in common» with people on the other side of the political aisle.

Neither side has an ounce of compassion or forgiveness, and both are so egotistical that they think they have the only answer.

I think that in the end, we can only guide the younf opf this country away from extremist / self - righteous thought on both sides, then we can finally have peace

You seem to think you are the only ones on the side of truth and therefore can say whatever you want without compunction or consequence?

i think woman who was complaining that she lost her inheritance, the only thing i will cheep in is this, if you really called yourself a Christian start now to read your bible, and know what the bibles says, don't be deceived any prophet or any other one by nature, because if ever you have been follow the words of God in side the bible, you will truly know that no one gonna know when the rapture will take place.

There theology stands on one side and preaching on the I other, «as if preaching is something independent of theology and as if preaching is optional and only certain people do that, whereas I would think that having the words of faith on your lips is one of the ways to be a Christian.

I think that one reason for this, on both sides, is that a look at man, as he is, may give us too much confidence when we are superficial in our looking or too much despair when we only regard man's condition as «cabin'd, cribb'd, confined» and as failing so terribly in its accomplishment.

How can we think critically if we're only hearing one side of the conversation, via the books we read, conferences we attend, and podcasts we listen to?

ok, ok, ok, i get it both sides think they are telling the truth there are no lyers here on this blogs only misinform people talking about two separate subjects yet thinking they are talking about the same thing the existence of god... one side believe the other doesn't what's wrong with that... sooner or later they'll changed their minds and one side will believe and the other won't so the arguement will forever be the same about two separate aguement on the same blog... but its definitely entertaining to read the comebacks... keep up the good work you all... its just as fun to read what the believer have to say as to what the nonebeliever have to say... after all it keeps all getting to know eachother better on what we believe right???

And I certainly know pro-lifers who think the «social justice» side pays only reluctant lip - service to church teachings on abortion and euthanasia.

The MP explained that he was on the side of the «innocent» people being caught up in the violence and encouraged a response that would show the UK's intolerance of such behaviour: «The only way of stopping someone who continues to be violent, destructive, murderous and surgical in the way that they carry out their actions against innocent people is to stop them being able to have the capabilities to be able to do it and I think that's what we're targeting and I would hope that the Prime Minister and the President of the United States will be targeting the weapons of war and by doing so taking away the ability to wage war.»

There is nothing wrong with being on the side of tradition the only reason I don't tend to make a traditional Christmas cake is because I never think I can make one as good as the one my mum makes

I have only made gluten - free noodles a couple of times, and think I need to work on erring on the side of undercooking, because they do get a little soft.

As a side note, I add only a few pinches of salt, because I think that the cheese provides more than enough salt.

At first, I thought it was because as vegetarians we often only get to eat the side dishes.

There is only one down - side I can think of when making homemade kale chips, like these Lemon Dill Kale Chips.

The only thing I can think of is that I always use a two piece tube pan, and I go around the edges with a sharp knife to separate it from the pan on the sides and from the tube in the middle.

For the frosting (i'm going to put some only between the layers, not on the side) i was thinking about only using vanilla yoghourt and berries... Do you think it will work and taste good?

(Side benefit: if the sauerkraut is only warmed, not cooked, then I think it'll retain a lot of its lactobacillus.)

It was a Friday night, and three thoughts were going through my mind as I sat with coworkers from the Bon Appétit publishing side in a booth at the packed Rutherford Grill in Napa Valley: (1) I'm only a few miles from two of the most revered restaurants in America, the French Laundry and the Restaurant at Meadowood, both of which I've been wanting to revisit; (2) I'm about to devour a slightly sweet pineapple - soy - marinated Hawaiian rib eye at yet another Hillstone; and (3) I'm perfectly okay with that.

Not only is it breakfast perfection with chicken chorizo and a perfectly cooked sunny - side up runny egg, but the thought to eat nachos for breakfast makes me James Van Der Beek giddy.

the other problem i often see is in our last 2 games, when someone create attack from wing / wide side and then passing the ball to mid he rarely watching other player position player before passing (like ox) so its just waste & only 1or 2 player who's hard tryin to get the ball, when arrived to mid like sanchez / giroud, the other i think are just watching and waiting (if lucky) the ball come near him.

Why is every Arsenal fans keep complaining about this draw, one thing I know for sure is that, Wenger is a wounded lion don't think you can take him down so easily because of his injury we know is hard sometimes for any team to face Bacerlona in the peach but is 11 players either side only the quality some times but we do have quality players too so why is the worries come on guys i know We can do this Wenger can do it, is our season it's a reason for the past 9 seasons without trophy God have something special for us & this is it.

Why do people think The Ö... will perform well - on a consistent basis - out on the wings.He needs that freedom to dictate and explore the proceedings in the final third, not to be restricted on 1 side of the pitch.He can play there but only occassionally not constantly

Only an idiot could think they will sell their best player against the side they will face in two weeks time.

With Ramsey I think we are lucky if he has to stay on the side for only one month.

That's why there is so much LB and G talk is that most fans are short sided and are only thinking «what do we need to win next year».

but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is changing, something some of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks: think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price, knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i mean... this is an act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has character... look at how he celebrate his goals... full of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going in our way (something wenger cant do because of his age and because he has never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration of a change, and a good one... lets take care of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid... lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..

«I'd be really interested in moving to Chelsea — not only because everything Willian tells me about the club, but because I think that I'd be able to achieve everything I want having someone like Jose Mourinho by my side,» Costa explained.

Right red thumb down man — you are the kind of guy who agrees with taking JC off, but if you really really really think about it — AW took off our goal scorer and the only on who added energy to the side, and then we lost.