Sentences with phrase «thought process here»

Thanks for sharing your thought process here!

The thought process here is the survivors can take a 5 % withdrawal from the death benefit each year (which is equivalent to the standard of living amount) while investing the death benefit principal and earning 5 % or better.

Really great thought process here.

Why I like this quote: I can really relate to Burry's thought process here.

I've used KDP Select myself, I'm just curious about your thought process here.

Now, the thought process here is that when we don't feed ourselves, our bodies assume calories aren't available and thus choose to store more calories than burning them, eliminating the benefits of weight loss with fasting.

What is your thought process here?»

The thought process here is that a bullish start to the year will set the market in the right direction, propelling it throughout the year.

Your business may not be able to ship free goods to all of its customers, but it's the thought process here that matters.

Respectfully speaking, I am sensing some dangerous thought processes here.

Not exact matches

Here, Tehrani thought, the company could distinguish itself from its peers and make the process of drug development more deliberate, like building a bridge or an airplane.

«On the other hand, if we both think it makes sense to have us do our deep discovery process with that Custom Design Audit so that we hand to you a Custom Development Blueprint, then we'll let each other know that right here at the end of our conversation today.

Putting your ideas on paper as a client will help you solidify your thoughts and if working on a larger project,, like a new website, starting here can help give you a good idea of the UX (user experience) which is a integral part of the design process.

Here are some of the thought processes I used to work through that extraordinarily difficult time.

«We thought the unique value proposition here is to build a business entirely around delivery and own every step of that process,» he says.

So we thought, «Why don't we just process it here and bypass the chain and deliver a better product faster?»

Here are three companies reimagining play time and academics to engage kids while helping shape their thought processes.

Feel free to read those posts for more of my thoughts on my process, but here is a quick summary of the places I look on a daily / weekly / monthly basis for investment ideas: Value Line Wall Street Journal Investment Blogs Screeners New Low List Value -LSB-...]

All it will take is some forward planning and thinking for you to take a piece of Amazon's market share during these oh - so important selling months — which is why we'll be here to guide you through the process all season long.

If you're thinking of starting a payroll processing firm, here are the five core elements you'll need.

The point articulated here is admittedly cumbersome, and it might seem out of place to think about the process in terms of the need to pay for «research.»

ps - if anyone would like to read my short journal, perhaps to get an idea of what the thought process is of a fundamentalist believer turning into an atheist, feel free to read mine here:

Part One, here called «Human Experience and Process Thought,» was given on the Alexander Brown Foundation as a series of lectures at Randolph - Macon College, Ashland, Virginia, U.S.A. in 1976; the material in Part Two, here called «God in Process: Christian Faith and Process Thought,» was a series of lectures given at St. Augustine's College, Canterbury, England in 1966.

Goss is not concerned here with the validity of Whitehead's conception of God, but rather to demonstrate that Camus» writings leave open the possibility of God as understood by Whitehead, and that Camus» thoughts on rebellion and its source in the beauty of nature are compatible with and made consistent by a process notion of God.

In the same paper, commenting on the final pages of Process and Reality, Cobb wrote «some of us think, following Whitehead here, that John's assertion that «God is love» is a profound metaphysical truth.»

This is an illustration of process thought's rejection of all dualism, here the traditional Western subject - object dualism.

Here I introduce that exploration with a brief characterization of the metaphysical position especially as it is stated by Alfred North Whitehead; Whitehead's is the seminal mind which provided the main structure of thought which is process philosophy.47 Whitehead has a close affinity to the classical metaphysical tradition.

Here we have the foundational elements of process thought, which I prefer to call the process - relational vision.

The relativity that Newton here rejected is not the relativity that Einstein propounded; and although the Special Theory of Relativity has shown Newton to be wrong in some respects, and in particular has shown that we should not think of time by itself in complete independence of everything external, time is related to space, and also to velocity, contrary to Newton's opinion, it has not shown that time is relative in Newton's sense, and merely some numerical measure of process.

Can you even begin to see the disconnect here in your thought process?

Although I am concerned here particularly with Whitehead, I do not think that the notion of ordinalism pertains idiosyncratically to him.6 For example, the «cosmology» that he found in Plato's Timaeus strongly influenced his metaphysics in Process and Reality (xiv).

The latter is a tangled problem at best, but it is clear that among the important founders of the process perspective — specifically I mean James, Peirce, Bergson, Whitehead, Dewey, and Hartshorne — it is Hartshorne's work which comes closest to being a kind of personalism.1 Whitehead explicitly sets aside the personalist perspective in Religion in the Making, considering its claims beyond the possibility of being established.2 On the other side, a number of personalists have been sympathetic to process thought, and Brightman is surely principal among them.3 Here I will not investigate the question of whether personalism in general, or even the idealistic type, is reconcilable with process thought.

But here, too, he merely affirms and does not really establish the basic compatibility between process thought and traditional Trinitarian theology.

only reason y i say this is because of Santification, once we give our life to the Lord, we streight way (so to speak) begin the process of Santification, this is Christ making us like him, and this Is SUFFERING It does nt happen over night, but for the duration of our time here, as you have said, its sort of like sin being done unto us, and we are handleing it just like Christ did, (with Love) of coarse with the help of the Holy Spirit, This Does NOT feel Good At ALL since our soulful flesh is Corrupt, (but our spirit is saved) This is were your trails and tribulation, your own desire, and All play apart, Now Moment by Moment we choose by our own will, And Jesus helps in these times, as he was tempeted, but without sin, The devil can do nothing but try and decieve the Christian into thinking that he has to work for his salvation as you have said, this thing here is about your Inheritance In Christ, Its gonna be some show nought broke christian in Heaven, because their trying to set of for themseleve trasure on earth, and their is going to be weeping and gnat of teeth, but it wont be, because of their going to Hell, It will be cause they miss out on what they could have had, and it is Devistation, cause they waste so much time, and they wont be able to attend the wedding, supper of the lamb, they wont be, getting the position over city, galacy, ectt... just check it out some of the points i have made, God Bless you!

I don't know all the answers here and I'd love to hear your thoughts in the comments but here is something that has helped me out in this process.

It should not be surprising then that Whitehead thought of God as a single actual entity immune to the possibility of loss.59 At least William Christian sees this as the proper Whiteheadian view.60 Nevertheless, Christian's position is challenged by Ivor Leclerc, who argues, in agreement with Hartshorne, that Christian's conclusion is incompatible with the categoreal scheme elaborated in chapter two of Process and Reality.61 Here, according to Leclerc, Whitehead «makes clear» that the category of «subjective perishing» is «necessarily applicable to every actual entity whatever, including God.»

Here as elsewhere, relational thinking is holistic, oriented to the total process and its possibilities for new becoming.

Here I think process metaphysics continues to make a valuable contribution to the discussion.

If systematic theology, however, has a different sense of its experience and public than philosophical theology, and if process thought is to be useful here, it may need to proceed differently than it has thus far.

It is with the idea and in the hope of advancing towards a solution of the problem that I here venture, basing my argument on the widest possible zoological and biological grounds, to put forward a coherent view of the «thinking Earth» in which I believe we may find, undistorted but yet embodying the corrections required by a change of order, the whole process of Life and of vitalization.

The actual thought process that went on in my head: «Ah, here we go again, I've heard this before.

= > If you still can not see the truth here at least remove the words slave trade from your thought process.

It is hardly necessary to state here what process thought has to say; and, in any event, I can refer those who do not know about it to a recent small book of my own, entitled Process Thought and Christian Faith (Macmillan, New York, and Nisbet, London, 1968), in which I attempted to give a brief sketch of that conceptuality with special reference to its availability for the enterprise of Christian re-concprocess thought has to say; and, in any event, I can refer those who do not know about it to a recent small book of my own, entitled Process Thought and Christian Faith (Macmillan, New York, and Nisbet, London, 1968), in which I attempted to give a brief sketch of that conceptuality with special reference to its availability for the enterprise of Christian re-concthought has to say; and, in any event, I can refer those who do not know about it to a recent small book of my own, entitled Process Thought and Christian Faith (Macmillan, New York, and Nisbet, London, 1968), in which I attempted to give a brief sketch of that conceptuality with special reference to its availability for the enterprise of Christian re-concProcess Thought and Christian Faith (Macmillan, New York, and Nisbet, London, 1968), in which I attempted to give a brief sketch of that conceptuality with special reference to its availability for the enterprise of Christian re-concThought and Christian Faith (Macmillan, New York, and Nisbet, London, 1968), in which I attempted to give a brief sketch of that conceptuality with special reference to its availability for the enterprise of Christian re-conception.

The question that Christians (or other religious people) should ask themselves here is philosophical rather than sociological: Granting (as I think we must) that modern science has given us new and often penetrating insights into reality and that modern technology has enormously increased our control over our lives, is it not possible that in the process some very precious things have been lost?

There are serious students of Whitehead who are persuaded that the closing sections on God in Process and Reality are inconsistent with his previous writing and thinking, and surely no one, perhaps not even Whitehead himself, could have foreseen on the basis of his previous work the doctrine of God which here emerges.

Here we find a fundamental difference between the Lockean presuppositions of contemporary education and process thought.

Although the moral implications of his philosophy are less elaborated, I see here great prospects for process thought.

I have simply argued here that we ought not to ignore or misconstrue real differences between these schools of process thought, nor permit their historical conflation to continue unchallenged.

Here the issues related to the moral implications of process thought were tackled.

The influence of these older evolutionary cosmologies on Whitehead's thought, moreover, is never carefully examined so much as it is presupposed.1 Against such presuppositions, I shall argue here that evolution and evolutionist theories play no significant role in Whitehead's metaphysics, and that there is no evidence in his major works of any significant influence from earlier process - oriented «evolutionary cosmologies.»