Sentences with phrase «thought process of writing»

They are also constantly providing tips to individuals to develop the thought process of writing a successful resume.

Not exact matches

«The leader has to recognize when negative emotions like frustration, impatience, anger, lack of self - confidence, jealousy, greed start to influence his thought processes,» writes the Dalai Lama and van den Muyzenberg in the The Leader's Way.

Not to mention, the process of writing is in fact immensely helpful in thinking through ideas.

I think this is one of the most important statements about the creative process ever written.

Whether I was writing for school, a fictional story for my personal entertainment, processing through my teenage years on my Xanga / Myspace blog, or even in college in my English classes, I found myself feeling an overwhelming sense of urgency to spew every single occurrence, happening, decision, prayer and thought onto paper or onto a digital document.

In 1993, Francis F. Seeburger, a professor of philosophy at the University of Denver, wrote a profound book on the thought processes of addicts called Addiction and Responsibility.

I am not a Whiteheadian scholar, and my limited understanding of process thought has been developed primarily through contact with feminist scholars writing from that perspective.

For all the years that Rachel and I have been writing alongside of each other, we have dreamed of something like this — we are creating the gathering I think we wish we would have had during our own processes of deconstruction and reconstruction.

But to call predictable biochemical processes a necessary condition of successful thought or writing does not make them exhaustive explanations.

In the same paper, commenting on the final pages of Process and Reality, Cobb wrote «some of us think, following Whitehead here, that John's assertion that «God is love» is a profound metaphysical truth.»

Whitehead wrote Process and Reality before the fruition of modern evolutionary cosmology, although his own «evolutionary doctrine» can, I think, accommodate that cosmology (95).

On the other hand, very few if any of the passages mentioning God in the rest of the text can plausibly be thought to be insertions.14 From these considerations we may conclude that Whitehead wrote most of Process and Reality before he discovered either the primordial envisagement or the consequent nature.

Hartshorne definitely thought of Brightman as a process philosopher, largely on the basis of Brightman's «A Temporalist View of God» in The Journal of Religion 12 (1932), 545 - 555, which Hartshorne cites with some frequency in his writing of the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s.

«In order to think,» he wrote in 1942, «we must claim for our reasoning a validity which is not credible if our own thought is merely a function of our brain, and our brains a by - product of irrational physical processes.»

The following pages represent one attempt to do this, and, as indicated earlier, they are written from the point of view of a supporter of process thought as the most adequate conceptuality available for us today.

In the quoted letter to Alexander, Collingwood writes: «I think I understand most of Space, Time and Deity, but God knows if I shall ever understand more than half of Process and Reality....

Although many philosophers in history have written from a process perspective, the term today is reserved for a particular school of thought centered around the works of Alfred North Whitehead, whose philosophical writings spanned the two decades of the 1920's and 1930's and the two countries of England and the United States.

«In the introduction to Misquoting Jesus, Ehrman writes that when he came to understand this process 30 years ago, it shifted his way of thinking about the Bible.

The minimal claim of process thought is that «by reason of the relativity of all things» each actual entity is preserved everlastingly in the divine experience.154 «God is immortal,» Hartshorne writes, «and whatever becomes an element in the life of God is therefore imperishable... I think the idea of omniscience implies that we have such an abiding presence in the mind of God.

John Cobb, too, has discussed aspects of the nature of man, such as freedom, responsibility, and sin, from a Whiteheadian point of view.151 Like existentialism, he writes, process thought makes subjective categories central to the analysis of man, and it understands subjectivity to be «in a very important sense causa sui,» that is, self - determinative.

Having considered the development of Whitehead's thought about God in Science and the Modern World and in Religion in the Making, we now turn to the most important book which he wrote, Process and Reality.

This book is written, in the field of process thought, for a general, non-specific audience.

(ENTIRE BOOK) A survey of process thought for the layperson: The author writes for those not necessarily versed in complex theological language.

I have found that to be really true with my experience as a writer — that even going into a project like Moxie, which had a pretty decent structure already, there is an element of mystery in every writing project where sometimes the process of writing leads my thoughts and my heart and my soul into territory that I didn't plan for.

I think about this little online community through every stage of the writing and publishing process, and I am so grateful for all the ways in which you have influenced how I think about the church.

Over the next several posts, I want to explain the history of the doctrine of the Inspiration of Scripture, the passages that are used to defend it, and provide a slightly modified and nuanced approach to the process by which I think God might have superintended the writing of Scripture.

(ENTIRE BOOK) Dr. Meller writes about Whiteheadian thought, without the jargon and technical intricacies, so that the lay person might have better understanding of the thinking of the founder of process philosophy.

In light of Lewis's long and distinguished career, encompassing so many contributions to process philosophy, many readers may have forgotten that Ford began his intellectual career as a Tillichian, writing his dissertation at Yale over thirty - five years ago on «The Ontological Foundation of Paul Tillich's Theory of Religious Symbol,» and publishing his first several scholarly articles in the early 1960s in distinguished journals like the Journal of the History of Philosophy and the Journal of Religion on aspects of Tillich's thought.

As Norman Pittenger writes, «Process thought is the name usually given to the view of the world that takes with utmost seriousness the dynamic, living, evolutionary quality of our existence and of the world in which we live (PT 205).

«No one has ever touched Zeno without refuting him,» he writes in a short essay commenting on the fundamental line of thought in his chief philosophical work, Process and Reality.16 In the same essay he explicitly distinguishes his theory from two other opposed positions: on the one hand from the view that interprets the character of becoming as illusory and becoming itself as simply empty and nonexistent in comparison with beings and their being.

In his early writing, Peirce calls the respect the ground of the sign's function, and I think that as a ground it has the function of leading the interpretation to another interpretation with another sign as its subject, all in an on - going semeiotic process.

There are serious students of Whitehead who are persuaded that the closing sections on God in Process and Reality are inconsistent with his previous writing and thinking, and surely no one, perhaps not even Whitehead himself, could have foreseen on the basis of his previous work the doctrine of God which here emerges.

In terms of such process thinking (about which I have written in Process Thought and Christian Faith, Macmillan, 1968), God is not thought to be simply the absolute, self - existent, unconditioned reality; there is a sense in which these terms are applicable as adverbs qualifying God's essential nature — but that essential nature is God's concrete love, his unfailing relationship with the world, his self - giving and willingness to receive from that world, his openness to «affects» from the world and from what goes onprocess thinking (about which I have written in Process Thought and Christian Faith, Macmillan, 1968), God is not thought to be simply the absolute, self - existent, unconditioned reality; there is a sense in which these terms are applicable as adverbs qualifying God's essential nature — but that essential nature is God's concrete love, his unfailing relationship with the world, his self - giving and willingness to receive from that world, his openness to «affects» from the world and from what goes onProcess Thought and Christian Faith, Macmillan, 1968), God is not thought to be simply the absolute, self - existent, unconditioned reality; there is a sense in which these terms are applicable as adverbs qualifying God's essential nature — but that essential nature is God's concrete love, his unfailing relationship with the world, his self - giving and willingness to receive from that world, his openness to «affects» from the world and from what goes onThought and Christian Faith, Macmillan, 1968), God is not thought to be simply the absolute, self - existent, unconditioned reality; there is a sense in which these terms are applicable as adverbs qualifying God's essential nature — but that essential nature is God's concrete love, his unfailing relationship with the world, his self - giving and willingness to receive from that world, his openness to «affects» from the world and from what goes onthought to be simply the absolute, self - existent, unconditioned reality; there is a sense in which these terms are applicable as adverbs qualifying God's essential nature — but that essential nature is God's concrete love, his unfailing relationship with the world, his self - giving and willingness to receive from that world, his openness to «affects» from the world and from what goes on in it.

If there remained no other inscriptions or written material concerning Egypt, it would be possible to reconstruct, to a very considerable degree, the life and thought of ancient Egypt from this important book, for in the process of preparing for death and immortality, almost everything that is important in life itself is considered in one way or another.

Students of mine, such as Professor André Cloots, Abraham Koothottil, James Eiswert, Paul Thelakat and many others started to be interested in process thought and wrote doctoral dissertations on the subject.

David Ray Griffin writes, «Because of the nonoverridable creativity of the creatures, God can not unilaterally determine the utterances of any voice, the writing of any book, the thought processes of any mind» (VPT 50, italics added).

One thing I have been thinking of since I wrote, and which this comment of yours is helping me to articulate — for me, the process of walking through despair, hopelessness and overwhelming and frightening circumstances and choosing to trust God in those places whether or not one external thing changes, that is part of helping me walk without bitterness.

On this subject, there is in fact a great variety of opinion among thinkers whose writing can be placed in the category of process - thought.

This is the line taken by what in North America today is frequently described as «process thought»; its greatest exponent was the late Professor Alfred North Whitehead in his works Process and Reality (his book has been re-arranged, and provided with excellent explanatory notes by D. W. Sherburne, under the title of Key to Whitehead's Process and Reality), Science and the Modern World, Modes of Thought, Adventures of Ideas, Religion in the Making, and Symbolism, all of them written after Whitehead had joined the faculty of Harvard University in the United States in the process thought»; its greatest exponent was the late Professor Alfred North Whitehead in his works Process and Reality (his book has been re-arranged, and provided with excellent explanatory notes by D. W. Sherburne, under the title of Key to Whitehead's Process and Reality), Science and the Modern World, Modes of Thought, Adventures of Ideas, Religion in the Making, and Symbolism, all of them written after Whitehead had joined the faculty of Harvard University in the United States in the thought»; its greatest exponent was the late Professor Alfred North Whitehead in his works Process and Reality (his book has been re-arranged, and provided with excellent explanatory notes by D. W. Sherburne, under the title of Key to Whitehead's Process and Reality), Science and the Modern World, Modes of Thought, Adventures of Ideas, Religion in the Making, and Symbolism, all of them written after Whitehead had joined the faculty of Harvard University in the United States in the Process and Reality (his book has been re-arranged, and provided with excellent explanatory notes by D. W. Sherburne, under the title of Key to Whitehead's Process and Reality), Science and the Modern World, Modes of Thought, Adventures of Ideas, Religion in the Making, and Symbolism, all of them written after Whitehead had joined the faculty of Harvard University in the United States in the Process and Reality), Science and the Modern World, Modes of Thought, Adventures of Ideas, Religion in the Making, and Symbolism, all of them written after Whitehead had joined the faculty of Harvard University in the United States in the Thought, Adventures of Ideas, Religion in the Making, and Symbolism, all of them written after Whitehead had joined the faculty of Harvard University in the United States in the 1920's.

Furthermore it is to be noted that through the years that have passed since 1936, Professor Daniel Day Williams, Professor Bernard M. Loomer, and Professor Bernard Meland, all three teaching in the United States, have written extensively in theological journals and occasionally in books, all of them engaging in this same task of employing the main tenets of process - thought for the explication of Christian faith.

Science can't explain the thought process, time commitment and creativity that went into this girl learning how to play the famous Star Wars «Cantina Theme» song by writing with her pencil on a piece of paper.

some of it not so good however, because we wanted our relationship to be different from our parents, we wrote our own service and that process was incredibly valuable we had massive arguments and really thrashed out what commitment meant to us and that I think has served us through harder times we are very happy and have two wonderful sons they are musicians Ben and Alfie I'd put a link but I don't know how you can just google them though I think you'd like them:)

This is a fair observation of my own thought process when writing this piece.

Are you really naive enough to believe that Wenger would bring anyone into this current locker room that is going to be given a strong voice... have you not been watching, listening or reading about our club for years... Lehman is a blind Wenger follower, which is the only reason he was even considered... just for a second think of all the strong personalities that have played for this club that have never been seriously considered even though they have expressed legitimate interest in participating in the coaching process... even worse, think of all the former greats who aren't even allowed on the same pitch as Wenger because they have offered their advice and / or criticism to the infallible one... I dare you to find a manager that has distanced himself from his former players as much as this man... it's the very reason why only one player I can think of has ever returned to play for Wenger and that was Flamini, which was hilarious considering we were desperately looking for a top quality defensive midfielder but Wenger could somehow find no one better than Flamini in the whole wide world... let's face it this club was simply trying to appease it's disgruntled fans by declaring that Wenger would no longer be given Ca rte Blanche when it came to the backroom staff so they probably asked him to give them a list of those who he would allow in the locker room... on that list he wrote Lehman, Pires and Bergkamp, likely because the first two are the only former players who haven't publicly questioned his horrible decision - making and the last one because he won't get in an airplane

Writing a book is quite a lengthly process I endlessly read and re-read activities, constantly thinking of ways to improve them.

In terms of the writing process, I think we're responsible for seeing our characters through a compassionate lens.

As someone who writes so much about food, and who worked as an advertising / regulatory lawyer for one of the world's largest food conglomerates, I didn't think there was a lot that could surprise me about the processed food industry.

After I wrote a series of articles about the industrially - processed convenience foods being served in my daughter's elementary school here in the District of Columbia I heard that Tony had been reluctant to talk to me because he thought I was putting too much pressure on Whitney Bateson, the nutritionist for Chartwells, the giant food service company contracted to provide meals for D.C. public schools.

LITRG's guide is available from the Group's website via the link: http://www.litrg.org.uk/News/2011/2011-repayments The guide includes: An explanation of who will be getting letters from HMRC Guidance on how to check if HMRC's calculations are accurate Information on what to do if you think the calculation is wrong or incomplete, or you do not understand it Information about how to claim money owed from previous tax years Examples of the letters taxpayers could write in response to receipt of a tax calculation Additionally, a question and answer guide on the 2011 PAYE reconciliation process is available on the website of the Chartered Institute of Taxation: http://tinyurl.com/taxqa2011 LITRG Chairman John Andrews said: «Taxpayers receiving letters from HMRC need to check their calculations carefully — even if the letter says they are getting a refund.

«[I] n softening his public position, Cuomo is unmistakably laying the groundwork for the possibility of a cop - out that he can sell as something else,» Josh Benson wrote in his analysis of Mr. Cuomo's thought process yesterday.