Instead, I will just try and explain
my thoughts in a sensible way, even if you and others disagree.
Not exact matches
On the first day of the seven - day program, I began jotting down questions I
thought I needed to answer before I could forward
in a
sensible way.
«No
sensible person looks at what's happening
in Washington and
thinks that any
way to run a country,» he says.
So relieved to read the comments (a lot of
sensible people here
in America are voicing out their
thoughts re: this article) following this plastic fantastic comparison of chairs used
in the east and the west - a chair is just a chair - like Dionne Warwick sang... people
in America know their minds now and hand manipulation of religion
in every
way possible is out the door.
Since God's
thoughts are not our
thoughts, nor God's
ways our
ways, when the Spirit moves among us the affects are almost always something that surpasses our expectations and that we never could have imagined and yet quite natural and
sensible in hindsight.
It might seem painfully clichéd, but I
think the only
sensible way of talking about Leonard Cohen is to say that his life was a spiritual journey, one documented
in great detail
in his work and one
in which many of us are grateful to see something of our own meanderings.
thanks for the
sensible comment fatboy yep i know i do get that they do nt really mean it, but i just cant come to terms with that, i do nt really expect civilised culture
in a sport but generally from the people
in the world, yep you are right about the real world, maybe thats the reason it annoys me extremely, i mean look our world is rotten to the core, the human mindset is terrible when it faces danger or problems for himself, and maybe thats the reason i just want football to stay as just as an entertainment industry but when i see that people even here let the words flow
in any kind of
way just because the are frustrated, i really cant come to terms with it, i really love black humor and some akbs react angrily when some fans tell some wheelchair jokes or for example on the post from admin where one could write jokes about wenger, some were really awesome, but when people cant control their emotion after a game and abuse other people it just irritates me as hell cause i really
think that thats one of the big problems
in the world..
«When people consider the alternative... the dangers of giving the keys to Number 10 to David Cameron
in a Conservative only government where they want to remorselessly cut, cut, cut public services for ideological reasons
way beyond what is necessary or put the keys to Number 10 into the hands of Labour, Ed Miliband and Ed Balls, who don't really want to deal with the task of balancing the books, actually they
think the
sensible thing to do is to stick to the course, finish the job, but finish it fairly.
«She's framing it
in that
way — a very pragmatic sort of
sensible campaign message I
think.
«So the only
way it can happen is if all the parties agree to work together, rationally, reasonably, sensibly on trying to deliver what I
think the British public would see as, not a priority, but a perfectly
sensible reform that we have people legislating
in the House of Lords who are elected by right.»
I
think that the
way medical science and technology have developed
in the past few decades does mean that an upper limit of 20 or 22 weeks would be
sensible.
I
think lots of things conspire against dealing
in a
sensible way with technological advance.
«I
think it's kind of fun,» says Larry Abbott, a physicist at Brandeis University
in Waltham, Massachusetts, «but I don't
think it's a
sensible way to disseminate scientific results
in general.»
The dev
thought it would be
sensible to auto rotate the screen
in case blind gamers couldn't see that they were holding it the wrong
way up, but then getting a load of feedback from blind gamers who couldn't play it.
I don't
think we're doomed
in that
way, though — for many health and safety problems, legislators and administrators have worked with scientists to produce pretty
sensible responses.
It's just not a
sensible way to
think about risk, and no sane person would address mundane risks
in the
way that he implies.
I simply can't
think of any
sensible way to define SAW as «temperature minus AGW» that could be reconciled with either my poster or what I've said so far
in this thread.
To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but
in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that
in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but,
in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part
in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured
in a not so precise
way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity
in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase
in UHI effect, but I
think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be
sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live
in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI
in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but,
in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least
in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough
in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).
But neither do I
think that following policies that will make such a
way of life compulsory for all —
in the hope of avoiding some imagined catastrophe if the winter nights get a degree or so warmer and the sealevel rises a foot or two — is a
sensible course.
I was too harsh on the good people of Adelaide though, they are the most water-wise
in the country, they only use 5 % of the Murray River's water, are implementing
sensible and forward
thinking strategies to reduce water use and to use it more efficiently, and the state of South Australia apparently agreed to stop over-allocating their share
way earlier than other states (see here).