That would be to go beyond what we are actually perceiving, which is paper, ink,
the thoughts of our fellow human beings etc..
Not exact matches
Once we begin to
think in this way (entailing,
of course, a «paradigm shift») we
are able to get beyond our narrow and destructive anthropocentrism and respect nature almost as we respect our
fellow humans.
, or a great number
of our
fellow human beings are susceptible to comforting stories, self - deception and an inability to
think critically.
If you want to know / understand how God wants us to
be human and so with this
thought, please listen to every bit
of Jeremy Myers and move into relationship with Jesus Christ and your
fellow citizens
of the world meant for you / us.
I know this will peeve a lot
of people out there but I
think as long as you treat your
fellow human beings the way you want to
be treated then regardless
of faith or lack thereof the gates
of heaven will
be open for you.
For me this phrase just means that we should value, respect, cherish and love each
human inherently because they
are fellow human beings regardless
of any labels we wish to put on them and that it
is helpful and constructive to distinguish people's «mark - missing» behaviour from their inherent value as a
human being i.e. «I
think what Donald Trump said about banning all Muslims from the United States
of America
is stupid» and NOT «Donald Trump
is stupid».
It
's completely against
human nature to
think of our
fellow man before ourselves.
We can, if we feel we must, for the sake
of our prior assumptions, strive to convince ourselves that all
of that
is just so much maudlin anthropomorphism; but we might just as well try to convince ourselves that the kindred feelings and
thoughts we fancy we perceive in our
fellow human beings are just so much mawkish «idiomorphism.»
There
is a God, and if it
is capable
of understanding its creations in the way the we understand ourselves (though i doubt it, b / c i imagine that God
thinks of us the same way we
think of parts in a machine, or items in a ingredients list, that
is to say inconsequential and unintelligent) that it would
be ashamed
of human behaviour
of groups and organizations that use belief and religion to justify actions against their
fellow man
I
think that just about everyone would agree that these explanations fall short whenever we personally encounter the Problem
of Evil in our lives and in the lives
of our
fellow human beings.
Since 1984, the Waldorf School
of Santa Barbara has prepared students to enter adulthood with the capacities
of self - discipline, independence, analytical and critical
thinking skills, respect for their
fellow human beings, and a reverence for the world's beauty and wonder.
«Our altruism may
be more hard - wired than previously
thought,» said Leonardo Christov - Moore, a postdoctoral
fellow at UCLA's Semel Institute
of Neuroscience and
Human Behavior.
Although it
's clear that participants
are purposely placed in coercive situations, we nonetheless
think we
are seeing something real and noteworthy about the character and the psychology
of fellow humans.
All we writers put so much effort into our work with the intention
of entertaining and / or informing our
fellow human beings, it
's nice to
think it
's being consumed, hopefully with appreciation.
Early hominid reliance on carcasses as a source
of meat, and the competition with
fellow scavengers that went with it,
are thought to have contributed to the evolution
of human tool use, cooperative food acquisition, and even language development — the very things that define us as a species!
Not enough
is heard about people like Lex, who like the character in Babel, refused any
thought of being compensated for helping a
fellow human being.
What we need to
be careful
of is thinking that a majority
of our
fellow humans agree with us on such crucial issues as the need to slow or even reverse population growth or the need to decrease our use
of fossil fuels.
Lehr
is science director and senior
fellow of the Heartland Institute, a Chicago - based free market
think tank that attacks the scientific evidence for
human - caused climate change.
Climate change skeptics like James Taylor, environmental policy
fellow at the Heartland Institute, a conservative
think tank, said the pushback in schools and legislatures reflected public frustration at
being told «only one side
of the global warming debate — the scientifically controversial theory that
humans are creating a global warming crisis.»
However, those who we really condemn as GREEDY
are in reality psychopaths, those folks who know no bounds to their wants and desires, who acquire resources to the detriment
of their
fellow beings without experiencing any uncomfortable
thoughts regarding the damage that they
are causing others due to their lack
of the thing that makes most
of us well developed
humans, a conscience.