Sentences with phrase «thoughts on all of the above»

What are your thoughts on each of the above??

Of course, I'd love to hear your thoughts on all of the above, especially as we close out 2017 here in just a few short days.

I am permitted to read your exchanges, however, and what I'd like to read is your thoughts on some of the above.

If you have answered yes to some of the above and are thinking on some of the above questions, then we may have the RIGHT OPPORTUNITY for you!!!!

Not exact matches

It's not a reality show where you are the star, and if you're focused on delivering results and impact, then you should separate yourself from the equation and think of how the team can meet the objective above.

Our impression of the structure and parameters of such models as these is that the result of the thought experiment above — a rise in short - term rates in real terms of 1 per cent — looks broadly similar in terms of its bottom line effect on activity.

That said, the chance of a bull trap in the DAX is still on, as the German index is holding up above the key 12,000 that we noted yesterday, and aggressive bulls could enter positions here if they think that the technical headwinds will be overpowered by the still intact long - term bullish trend soon.

Early on, we had some indication that she would be highly emphasizing the plight of the underemployed, for example, and also there were some chances she would think about approaching the inflation target from above rather than below, essentially delaying rates until it was clear that inflation was above target.

While some of the recent data have been encouraging — I am thinking in particular of the latest data on exports, employment and business sentiment in our BOS — they do not support a forecast of above - potential growth by themselves.

However, as I say above, I think actively investing on the scale he does can be considered a form of entrepreneurship, due to the way he is seeking opportunities, bringing money to bear, and generating a profit.

I wrote the tweet above last Friday afternoon when a sea of red on my computer screen got me thinking more critically this weekend about what exactly was the cause for the relentless downward pressure on commodities (metals specifically).

If you click on the «Growth Investors» link a few paragraphs down in this article above, you'll find a fully recap of my thoughts on growth investing methods, though I've developed my thinking a little more since then.

Jim Rohn famously said, You are the average of the five people you spend the most time with As a young investor starting out it would serve you well if you can spent time with Warren Buffet (vicariously) by reading his fantastic letters At Tankrich - We have taken an initiative to share his learnings through our video channel This week having finished the partnership letters I thought it would be good if I could document those learnings in a single place After few weeks of editing here is the final copy for you on Learnings from Warren buffett partnership letters Below is Table of content of this ebook [l2g name = «Learnings From Warren Buffet partnership letters» id = «1148»] Download a copy by sharing any of the above social links (I do...

Now let's take the academic speak out of the above and simply say that if you base the scorecard on what you think buyer's value versus actually going out to talk to buyers and using qualitative methods to uncover values — it will be of no particular use.

Your tastes are above reproach and your musical canon has been arrived at after more academic thought than a doctoral dissertation on the «Ebb and Flow of The Mental Qualitative State Due to the Societal Imperatives of Pezz Dispensers.»

Second, by passing moral judgment so ostentatiously, the blogger is putting himself above the man he is condemning, and I think you shouldn't pass judgment on (say) Kingsley Amis's curmudgeonly prejudices unless you can plausibly claim to have a tenth of his literary talent.

Like the weary sailor, the refugee from wreck and storm, who escapes half «dead, and then, in terror, shudders with dread at the very mention of the name of the «sea»; who swears he'll never sail again, who raves he'll stay home, even on the calmest days, but then, in time, forgets his fearful ways, and seeks, again, his fortune above the waves; I, too, have barely escaped the storms that revolve around you, my love, traveling far away, vowing to avoid another catastrophe, but I can't; the thought of you breaks my resolve, and so, I return to where, on that fateful day, Inearly drowned in your tempestuous sea.

On second thought, drop an anvil on my head on top of all of the above and still do better... I've gone through 100000 lines of code in a language that I'm lousy at and found the bugOn second thought, drop an anvil on my head on top of all of the above and still do better... I've gone through 100000 lines of code in a language that I'm lousy at and found the bugon my head on top of all of the above and still do better... I've gone through 100000 lines of code in a language that I'm lousy at and found the bugon top of all of the above and still do better... I've gone through 100000 lines of code in a language that I'm lousy at and found the bugs.

I thought the Biblical perspective was that elders are to have a good repuration with outsiders and to be above reproach... and to not even have the appearance of evil... Sorry, on issues like this I'll take the apostle Paul over a magazine editor anyday.

Until then, what are your thoughts on any of the seven doctrines above which I had questions about?

With all their laudable effort to understand the integrity of the Scriptures, both Old and New, and to insist on the basic unity of the Bible; with all their recognition of the place of Jesus within the setting of Jewish piety and religious thought, these scholars sometimes fail to see that the very truth about God which the Bible as a whole affirms, and above all that which the New Testament says about Jesus himself, can be smothered by sheer biblicism and thereby made meaningless for those to whom the gospel should be a living, vitalizing, and contemporary message.

But I think there is some risk that it might be misconstrued so as to obscure certain truths which I believe to be fundamental: that the Passion is the moment at which that complete oneness with the Father which is the unique and all - pervading characteristic of the life of Jesus is paradoxically manifested; that it is at that moment, above all, that Jesus discloses to us God himself in action; that the judgement passed on Jesus and the testing brought to bear upon him are a judgement and a testing exercised (of course, within the permissive will of God) by evil men, or, to use mythological language, by the devil; and that the judgement of God pronounced at Calvary is that which Christ's accepting love passes upon those men, and upon ourselves as sharers in their sinfulness, by showing up their sin in all its hatefulness.

Mantel's memoir, like the novels, is thick with smoldering grievances: against teachers («I don't know if there is a case on record of a child of seven murdering a schoolteacher, but I think there ought to be»); adults generally («In Hadfield, as everywhere in history of the world, violence without justification or apology was meted out by big people to small»); and above all, against the Catholic Church, which stood in judgment on her mother when Mantel was a child.

Prayer for the day: Christ with me, Christ before me, Christ behind me, Christ in me, Christ beneath me, Christ above me, Christ on my right, Christ on my left, Christ when I lie down, Christ when I sit down, Christ when I arise, Christ in the heart of everyone who thinks of me, Christ in the mouth of everyone who speaks of me, Christ in every eye that sees me, Christ in every ear that hears me.

This discussion seems to have moved from a discussion on 1 Corinthians 9 (which could be used in a wrong way) to the issue of whether those lead a church should be paid so I offer the above thoughts to restore some balance.

I can't help but wonder how many «widows and orphans «we could have helped in the time it has taken to list / type / think and read the above — shame on us as the body of Christ.

I have my own thoughts on that as my plan, which I emailed to Sen. Ron Paul, to begin taxing obesity at $ 1.25 / lb of fat above a 12 % body content of fat would force americans to lose weight and take better care of themselves and their children, else, pay out of your ass, literally.

This definition does not imply that metaphysics does not deal with reality and only refers to thinking about reality.19 As stated above, in An Essay on Metaphysics, Collingwood does not intend to expound his own metaphysical ideas, but to give a justification of the metaphysical project.

A general review of the endnotes from Gunter's paper reveals a fair number of sources who will corroborate the claim that Bergson's scientific views are nor only not outdated, but go very» much to the heart of current scientific methods and insights, but particularly, see A. C. Papanicolaou and Pete A. N. Gunter, eds., Bergson in Modern Thought Towards a Unified Science (New York: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1987), and for important background on how Bergson came to be seen as dated when he was not, see also, Milic Capek, Bergson and Modern Physics, (cited above) and The Philosophical Impact of Contemporary Physics (Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, 1961), and the volume edited by Gunter, Bergson and the Evolution of Physics (cited above).

If I held a pot of boiling water above your head (I'm not angry with you, I'm just using you in this exmple), you could not tell me to stop, because what if I thought pouring boiling water on peoples» heads it right?

I have lots of self - esteem, but I don't place myself so far above all other life on this planet by thinking my species is «special» and master over all else.

We have been instructed by Harvey Cox and his disciples on the values inherent in festivity and fantasy that lift us above prosaic ways of thinking and feeling.

Feel free to weigh in below on what you think of these gospel related questions, though if you are going to answer them, please do that using the form above.

The only reason we limit the discussion to the so - called «side A» and «side B» debate is because, as Cindy mentions above, the most you could ever squeeze out of Scripture is a prohibition on same - sex acts (which I still think takes quite a bit of squeezing).

Hopefully some new posts on understanding the violence of God will be published soon... I am still not sure my new approach has adequate answers to the four problems I stated above, but I think it is a move in the right direction.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

(i) the question of gay rights — funny I agree with gay rights, must be a political debate at its heart (ii) a wonan's right to choose — funny I agree with this, see above thought (iii) teaching evolution in school — again I agree (iv) my ability to buy a glass of wine on Sunday — definitely politics here (v) immunizing teens against HPV — got my kids immunized, not even politics here (vi) population control — this is religions fault??? no this is cultural (vii) assisted suicide at end of life — agree with that, still have my religion (viii) global warmning — agree it needs to get fixed, doesn't have anything to do with religion

When I read about Calvin and others ideas on what Gods Word says, the Arminian, Lytheran, Wesleyan, Unitarian and various Church denominations and their interpretations, particularly when they hang their whole idea on one part of the Bible to prove how right they are, it affirms what I have always thought since before I was saved by God as well as after that amazing act of grace on His part, that man values and honors the mind far above the heart.

No such limitation of simultaneity as a physically relevant relation exists in his earlier philosophy of nature.12 In addition, Whitehead appends a note to this statement which has an oddly apologetic tone, especially when one reads the note (as I think one must) as explaining how the statement above is compatible with Einsteinian assumptions: «This principle lies on the surface of the fundamental Einsteinian formula for the physical continuum (PR 61 / 96).

Each time I'm on a plane that rises above the clouds at sunrise, I think of Psalm 139 — «If I rise on the wings of the dawn, or settle on the far side of the sea... even there your hand will guide me» — and I am grateful for the gift of these lovely words.

Subsequent generations have voiced similar themes to propel America's narrative: their country was thought to have a «manifest destiny;» to represent «an empire of liberty;» to offer the «last best hope on earth;» and above all, to embody «American exceptionalism.»

But fundamentalist American Christians think they're above the rest of the world, so it's irrelevant that they're a minority on the world scale.

If the sessions are conducted according to good teaching techniques, if there is a free and open spirit on the part of the leader, if there is a readiness to work together and think together about important things, and above all if there is a friendly atmosphere, such persons are quite likely to be sufficiently attracted to return again and again.

I am thinking not so much of the theological limits of the papal ministry, about which the Council spoke, as of the practical limits of his influence — above all on the Roman curia, without which no pope can lead the church.

This is evident in Adventures of Ideas, such as in the passage on «Creativity» quoted at length above, or in its reference to the dart of Lucretius.14 It is also evident in Modes of Thought, for example, its statement about «the whole antecedent world conspiring to produce a new occasion» (164).

The third essay, «The Church's Limits», sketches the author's thoughts above all on the capacity of the Church to give directions in the public social sphere.

Their chosen quote, and I hope you can read it with as much incredulous merriment as I did, «When the intellectual authors of the modern right created its doctrines in the 1950s, they drew on nineteenth - century political thought, borrowing explicitly from the great apologists for slavery, above all, the intellectually fierce South Carolinian John C. Calhoun.»

Along with this, the philosophical notions about soul, about immortality, about a realm above and beyond the hurly - burly of this world, present in the tradition of Greek philosophy and variations on that philosophy in the early Christian era, had become so much part of the atmosphere of thought that inevitably these two affected Christian thinkers.

My hope is that you stop praying all together!!!! I want you to take God out of everything... My hope is that you will kill each other... Loose your way... Put greed, corruption, sinfulness and above all, self above all else... That you will worship all that is evil and wring every last drop of God out of your hearts... I want you to put money, forget family, think and do immoral thoughts, and stop helping your fellow man,, exploit them, spit on them use them until every last one of you is wretched and crawling in the dirt cursing God... Pleas help me... your friend Satan...

Yet, given the logical problems connected with the notion of a finite actual entity somehow prehending the objective integration of the primordial and consequent natures within God (as indicated above), it makes sense to think of God's influence on the concrescing actual occasion simply in terms of divine feelings vis - à - vis objective possibilities already present in the world as a common field of activity for God and all finite actual occasions.