Sentences with phrase «thread here»

Hi there I put this thread here to make to you all a way to make money 0nline free!

You can kind of see the tan colored thread here where I did that running vertically along the top of the folds on the back.

@Brad Noe Awesome thread here on buying a foreclosure.

I started a thread here on BP.

@Daphne Barber, I am a bit late to the thread here, but by no means is 50 (or any age in my opinion) too old to invest in real estate.

Did I not say in a post on some thread here on REM, not so long ago, that what was stopping some «member of the public» from doing exactly as he is doing?

Nasar sorry to hijac your thread here..

In keeping with the PA themed thread here I would put in my own two cents and say that my brother and I have partnered up to do the SFR and duplex deals while we are both still working full time.

More info can be found at the XDA thread here or at OmniROM's web page here.

More info about this release can be found at this XDA thread here.

If you're interested in seeing even more Android users» suggestions for awesome shortcuts, check out the full Reddit thread here.

If you want to gain root for this new firmware, then you will need to use the instructions listed by Chainfire in this XDA thread here.

If you want to learn more about LiquidSmooth custom ROM then you can visit the developer's web page here or this XDA thread here.

If you find any major bugs you should tell others by posting in comments or heading to the SentinelROM XDA thread here to search for extra help.

More info about this custom build can be found in this XDA Thread here.

Read the extra info at the XDA thread here for a better view on this release.

You can learn more about it by visiting the XDA thread here.

Official support thread here and download page here.

You can check out rovo89's forum post below announcing the release of Xposed v89, and you can download it from the Xposed thread here.

Find out more in the Google Product Forums thread here.

Learn about this ROM by visiting its XDA thread here.

Note the common thread here of saving Los Angeles, at all costs.

A teacher and an author, John will add much lustre to Slaw and certainly knows how to provoke us into a discussion: his mild, short first comment on CanLII has rapidly turned into the hottest thread here in quite a while.

This is almost as exciting as reading the first Climategate thread here.

John V presented some graphics in the comments thread here and below is my first pass — this comment is not intended to exhaust all possible cross-cuts of the data is merely the first thing that I looked at.

On a separate thread here, and on http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange, I recently argued as follows

OT Fyi John, I finally had a look at Ayers as you suggested and I am happy to outline a list of reasons why not to lend his work any credibility on an open thread here or at Deltoid if you're interested.

I think it's a reasonable inference from this thread, the previous thread here and the original thread at Deltoid that Graeme's goal is to find a way to conclude that sea level rise due to global warming is not happening and nothing to worry about.

A third specific proposal I have seen was in an article by Rutt Bridges on an earlier thread here: «Economic Challenges for Carbon Capture - Storage and the Role of Natural Gas.»

It was the subject of a thread here.

I've laid it out frequently and again on this thread here: https://judithcurry.com/2013/11/21/social-cost-of-carbon/#comment-416438

It was on the Ice Ages thread here and it was ~ 500 not 450, but close enough.

On a recent thread here @WUWT, Leif made the following observation.

«If they are just words to you — there is a thread here on spatio - temporal chaos» I've read it; that you assume I haven't is disappointing.

If they are just words to you — there is a thread here on spatio - temporal chaos.

And a link to an accessible pdf - file had already been posted in the same thread here in this comment: https://judithcurry.com/2014/07/07/understanding-adjustments-to-temperature-data/#comment-605977

My thanks to Anon - but I still await his reply to my previous response to him at «my» thread here on Mauna Loa.

A very different response from the earlier confidence thread here.

I discuss this at length on another thread here at WUWT.

Also, I while back on a thread here at WUWT I explained how the PDO pattern was created by ENSO, and if I can dig it up I'll throw it here for you.

Fanny complains of being censored at WUWT, but considering the fact that's he's broken at least one thread here with his incoherent topicless pictoart and Hansen p0rn, I'm surprised he's not gone from here, too.

Andrew, I realize that talking about the MWP may be bit off thread here, but since we don't seem to know what caused it with any certainty (or the LIA) and since prof muller invoked it in his NYT op - Ed piece, I was surprised at his level of certainty about attributing so much of the recent warming to CO2.

As the Oregonian thread here demonstrated, people can easily read what they want instead of reading what is actually written.

They just had a small notice on the rice «study» which is another thread here at WUWT.

In my thread here, there's a great citation to a page in Norwegian discussing the effect of wind on the temperature of Svalbard.

The above linked site also has an erudite technical discussion thread concerning this week's report about the state of accuracy of understanding of central Atlantic water currents now reported as 1/3 less mobile than when last measured 50 years ago, with conjecture about possible climate interrelationships if the interpretation is verified; the beginning article is here and the full discussion thread here covering various parts of that ocean.

In a previous thread here I have made a fairly detailed argument why I think his original piece was nonsense.

Steven Goddard's recent thread here on WUWT (Volcanoes Cause Climate Change) discusses what I guess is the more conventional view, which blames a volcanic eruption — Krakatoa (535).

Perhaps a future thread here could pioneer The Funding Effect in Science, with particular reference to State funding (the effect of private funding being something already familiar).

(For proof of my own claims against NikfromNYC, I invite interested readers to follow the entire comment thread here: http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2011/05/18/milloys-op-ed-riddled-errors/)