Not exact matches
The designation of potential
threat («potentially dangerous», «dangerous», etc.) should NOT be made
by Animal Control.
Billy and Diane Boyd had asked for the hearing to appeal a decision
by the
Animal Control Hearing Council to have the dogs destroyed because they posed a
threat to the public.
Background The ASPCA recognizes that there are dogs who
by virtue either of training or lack of training and socialization — especially in combination with a genetic predisposition to be wary of strangers, aggressive toward other dogs and / or predatory toward other
animals — may pose serious
threats if inadequately supervised and
controlled by their guardians.
In fact, the purpose of New York's
Animal Population
Control Program Fund, as written into law, is to «reduce the population of unwanted and stray dogs and cats thereby reducing incidence of euthanasia and potential
threats to public health and safety posed
by the large population of these
animals.»
Animal Control may require any animal that exhibits dangerous behavior as defined in this Act to be fully restrained and prevented from contact with the public in any way pending review, or if considered by Animal Control to be a significant threat to the safety of people and animals, impounded by Animal Control, using whatever restraints and tranquilization is necessary, until a determination is re
Animal Control may require any
animal that exhibits dangerous behavior as defined in this Act to be fully restrained and prevented from contact with the public in any way pending review, or if considered by Animal Control to be a significant threat to the safety of people and animals, impounded by Animal Control, using whatever restraints and tranquilization is necessary, until a determination is re
animal that exhibits dangerous behavior as defined in this Act to be fully restrained and prevented from contact with the public in any way pending review, or if considered
by Animal Control to be a significant threat to the safety of people and animals, impounded by Animal Control, using whatever restraints and tranquilization is necessary, until a determination is re
Animal Control to be a significant
threat to the safety of people and
animals, impounded
by Animal Control, using whatever restraints and tranquilization is necessary, until a determination is re
Animal Control, using whatever restraints and tranquilization is necessary, until a determination is reached.
Then in 2004 a Pest
Animal Control CRC report cited Pimentel for the figure of 18 million cats and in 2008 the Commonwealth
Threat Abatement Plan for predation
by feral cats cited the 2004 report also for the figure of 18 million.
(a) If upon investigation it is determined
by the
animal control officer or law enforcement officer that probable cause exists to believe the dog in question poses an immediate
threat to public safety, then the
animal control officer or law enforcement officer may seize and impound the dog pending the hearings to be held pursuant to this article.