... on
the threat of dirty bombs: There are problems there, but they are tiny compared with the big missile stockpiles.
The primary
threat of a dirty bomb would be the economic fallout.
Not exact matches
But with lawmakers and government agencies ratcheting up the rhetoric about
dirty bombs in their lobbying for more funding, the average citizen can hardly be blamed for considering
dirty bombs a grave
threat — a perfect example
of well - intentioned efforts that would amplify, not dampen, the impact
of a terrorist attack.
On the other hand, the danger
of big, headline - grabbing
threats has been ameliorated to a limited extent — but these
threats, like
dirty bombs or bioterrorism, have always been inherently unlikely to come to pass on anything like the apocalyptic scale feared by some.
Dirty bombs make big messes, and may require massive relocations, as at Chernobyl, but they pale by comparison to the primary
threat that Allison has written about in Nuclear Terrorism: The Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe — the possibility that terrorists might get hold
of and detonate a nuclear
bomb in a major city.