Often, companies that get sued or
threatened by patent trolls will end up paying a licensing fee, even though they don't think the patents are legitimate.
Not exact matches
If a business does come under attack
by a
troll threatening a lawsuit over potential
patent infringement, the business owner needs a less costly way to fight back.
There's a derogatory term in Silicon Valley for companies that amass huge troves of
patents and make money
by threatening lawsuits: «
patent trolls.»
This played into the hands of
patent trolls, who were able to claim the mantle of «reform» for themselves
by supporting the weaker legislation, which offered only cosmetic changes and none of the measures (like fee - shifting or discovery reform) that would
threaten their operations.
On the other side, trial lawyers and the
patent trolls are expected to push to water it down, in part
by warning that it will
threaten «innovation.»
Negotiations over how to appropriately address
patent trolls — companies that buy up
patents and then leach cash from inventors
by threatening infringement lawsuits — have repeatedly bedeviled Senate staffers working on the issue.
Obama's words came after the House had passed a bill aimed at slaying
patent trolls — companies that buy up
patents and then leach cash from inventors
by threatening infringement lawsuits.
Patent trolls are firms that buy overly - obscure, general or vague patents with the sole purpose of extracting licensing arrangements and settlement payments by threatening businesses and companies with claims of patent infring
Patent trolls are firms that buy overly - obscure, general or vague
patents with the sole purpose of extracting licensing arrangements and settlement payments
by threatening businesses and companies with claims of
patent infring
patent infringement.
We've long been concerned about «
patent trolls» — companies that don't produce anything themselves but buy
patents, then make their money
by threatening and even suing companies that are producing products.
Ramirez's remarks suggest the federal government is finally getting serious about the harm caused
by patent trolls — shell firms that don't make anything but amass old
patents to
threaten lawsuits against productive companies.
San Francisco, California — The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) won a court ruling today affirming that an infamous podcasting
patent used by a patent troll to threaten podcasters big and small was properly held invalid by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (U
patent used
by a
patent troll to threaten podcasters big and small was properly held invalid by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (U
patent troll to
threaten podcasters big and small was properly held invalid
by the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office (U
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).