Sentences with phrase «threatened use of violence»

Ecoterrorism.Eco - terrorism is defined by the Federal Bureau of Investigation as «the use or threatened use of violence of a criminal nature against people or property by an environmentally oriented, subnational group for environmental - political reasons, or aimed at an audience beyond the target, often of a symbolic nature.»

Not exact matches

If media violence, especially when that violence is in its nature sexual, in fact does threaten the quality of American life, then how do the creative and managerial people in television feel about the use of violence in their productions?

«Firearms are far too frequently used to injure, threaten, or coerce victims of domestic violence,» said Nico Bocour, the group's state legislative director.

The system also uses keyword and textual analysis to quantify and track the level of violence and racial hatred expressed on a Web site or forum — a measure that can be used to determine which groups might be most threatening and to alert investigators to follow up.

Violence is defined by the World Health Organization as the intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another Domestic Violence Prevention Centre is a non-government community based organisation that provides specialist domestic violence support serviceViolence is defined by the World Health Organization as the intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another Domestic Violence Prevention Centre is a non-government community based organisation that provides specialist domestic violence support serviceViolence Prevention Centre is a non-government community based organisation that provides specialist domestic violence support serviceviolence support services to the

Violence is defined by the World Health Organization as the intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another

The authorities must also cease the use of violence and lethal force at peaceful demonstrations and not take actions that threaten or intimidate activists and journalists.

The report further sets out that, while the present state of activism is healthy, state pushback continues to threaten activists through violence and judicial harassment, with particular attention now being paid to bloggers and others using the internet for activism.

The commissioner may also place under preliminary registration review any school that has conditions that threaten the health, safety and / or educational welfare of students or has been the subject of persistent complaints to the department by parents or persons in parental relation to the student, and has been identified by the commissioner as a poor learning environment based upon a combination of factors affecting student learning, including but not limited to: high rates of student absenteeism, high levels of school violence, excessive rates of student suspensions, violation of applicable building health and safety standards, high rates of teacher and administrator turnover, excessive rates of referral of students to or participation in special education or excessive rates of participation of students with disabilities in the alternate assessment, excessive transfers of students to alternative high school and high school equivalency programs and excessive use of uncertified teachers or teachers in subject areas other than those for which they possess certification.

It used the provision of aid as a benchmark solution, and then suggested the following: linking aid to limits on military spending; sending significant military forces into nations emerging from conflict to reduce the risk of a relapse into violence; providing (and having the ability to back up) a promise that a military force will intervene when a democratically elected government is threatened by violence.

Calling Protest Extremism Stifles Legitimate Public Discussion & Action Second, there is the possibility of genuine extremism out there in the broad environmental movement: Blockading a mountaintop removal coal mine or loudly protesting outside one is one thing, specifically threatening workers or mine owners with violence (which to my knowledge has never happened, I only use it as an example), would be another entirely.

A federal statute defines «crime of violence» as «(a) an offense that has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another, or «(b) any other offense that is a felony and that, by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense.»

The lawsuit against the shooter's former employer, G4S, alleges that it knew he was mentally unstable and threatening violence, yet they employed him as an armed guard, obtained his security license from the state with the use of a fraudulently signed psychological assessment, and repeatedly gave him weapons training, making him a more effective and dangerous shooter.

obtaining of property from another, with his consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right.

Her work includes obtaining an injunction to safeguard Trust staff from a member of the public who had used / threatened unlawful violence and protecting the identity of a nurse diagnosed with HIV.

The wrongful death lawsuit against the shooter's former employer, G4S, alleges that it knew the shooter was mentally unstable and threatening violence, yet obtained his security license from the state with the use of a fraudulently signed psychological assessment, employed him as an armed guard, and repeatedly gave him weapons training.

A threat of violence suffices to ground a conviction for robbery, and by threatening to harm his victims while committing robbery, the accused used violence against them.

Section 1 (6) of RCA 2016 adopts the definition of «riot» in s 1 of the Public Order Act 1986, namely: «Where 12 or more persons who are present together use or threaten unlawful violence for a common purpose and the conduct of them (taken together) is such as would cause a person of reasonable firmness present at the scene to fear for his personal safety, each of the persons using unlawful violence for the common purpose is guilty of riot.»

As a result of this, practitioners have anticipated a greater need for more specific drafting of non — molestation orders (see «Domestic Violence and Family Law: A New Era», Bansi Soni, Family Law Week, 13 July 2007), as opposed to the previously general form of: «the Respondent must not use or threaten to use violence against the applicant, or intimidate, pester, molest or harass the applicantViolence and Family Law: A New Era», Bansi Soni, Family Law Week, 13 July 2007), as opposed to the previously general form of: «the Respondent must not use or threaten to use violence against the applicant, or intimidate, pester, molest or harass the applicantviolence against the applicant, or intimidate, pester, molest or harass the applicant.»

(a) «Domestic violence» means an act of violence or a threatened act of violence upon a person with whom the actor is or has been involved in an intimate relationship, and may include any act or threatened act against a person or against property, including an animal, when used as a method of coercion, control, punishment, intimidation, or revenge directed against a person with whom the actor is or has been involved in an intimate relationship.

Violence was defined as engaging in a physical fight as a result of which the opponent had received medical attention (including bandaging a cut) or a fight involving multiple people or using a weapon to threaten someone.

The observed cross-loadings of individual items as well as items that belonged to other domains than in the conceptual model may reflect that female victims often are not exposed to one form of violence in isolation of the other.32 For example, the sexual violence item «Forced me to have sex against my will by using his / her physical strength (by hitting, holding me firmly or threatening me with a weapon),» which loaded in both the physical and sexual IPV components, is hard to divide into one or the other category.

Although research findings on prevalence are inconclusive, they generally find that women and men report similar levels of violence when the contexts, motives and consequences are not considered.6 When they are considered, studies assessing IPV perpetrated by men compared to women often report gender differences regarding the types of violence, reasons for the violence, context in which the violence occurs and consequences of the violence.6, 7 For example, studies assessing differences in IPV find men's violence against women to be more severe, threatening and controlling8 — 10 and involve longer - lasting victimisation, fear of bodily injury or death, more injuries and more adverse health effects.5, 11, 12 It has also been found that women tend to use physical violence out of anger, not being able to get the partner's attention or in self - defence and retaliation, 11 whereas men often use it as a means to exercise coercive control.13, 14

Third, whoever has used, is using, or is threatening to use physical force or violence toward the other spouse has a source of power.

Major violence included kicking, biting, hitting with a hand or an object, beating, choking, threatening with a knife or gun, or use of a knife or gun.

While there is no single definition, the central element of domestic violence (which includes - physical, verbal, emotional and financial abuse) is an ongoing pattern of behaviour aimed at controlling a partner through fear — for example, by using behaviour which is violent and threatening.

Domestic violence is an ongoing pattern of abusive, threatening and violent behavior that is used by one partner to maintain control over the other partner.