Is being known as the journal who tries to sue critics of their editorial policies (or worse, tries to intimidate critics by
threatening libel suits) really going to help?
However, perhaps the way to fix that is to start applying a higher level of quality control rather than by
threatening libel suits against people who publicly point out the problems?
Not exact matches
The Labour peer
threatened Daily Mail sketch writer Quentin Letts with a
libel suit after he called him «stupid» and suggested he only received his peerage because he was a television personality.
Monckton learned of Mandia's blog post and
threatened him with a
libel suit.
A scientist
threatened him with a
libel suit.