In conjunction, it becomes extremely difficult to change the minds of people who are fixed on conclusions inferred
through analogical reasoning, even if it is rational for them to soberly reconsider.
Michael Genesereth of Codex, Stanford's Center for Legal Informatics wrote two years ago that computational law «simply can not be applied in cases requiring
analogical or inductive
reasoning,» though if there are enough judicial rulings interpreting a regulation the computers could muddle
through.